Intel Core i5-5575R vs Intel Core i5-7500T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-7500T and Intel Core i5-5575R are two 4-core, 4-thread desktop processors from Intel, separated by roughly two years of architecture evolution. The data reveals a close contest: the i5-7500T holds an average benchmark score of 1483, while the i5-5575R trails narrowly at 1478, a difference of just 0.4% in favor of the newer chip. Both processors occupy the 38th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they deliver nearly identical overall performance in the broader market context. Despite the near-identical averages, the head-to-head results show a distinct split, with the i5-7500T winning seven of eight tests, while the i5-5575R claims a decisive victory in the remaining one.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the data is the consistency of the i5-7500T’s wins across the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-7500T scores 448 against the i5-5575R’s 435, a 3% advantage. Single-core R15 results follow suit: 63 versus 61, a 3.3% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-7500T posts 1870 multicore and 263 single-core, while the i5-5575R manages 1816 and 256, respectively, yielding 3% and 2.7% margins. The Cinebench R23 results reinforce this pattern: the i5-7500T scores 4454 multicore and 628 single-core, compared to 4324 and 610 for the i5-5575R, both 3% advantages.

The i5-7500T also wins Geekbench single-core, scoring 1078 against 1072, though this margin is slim at just 0.6%. The one outlier is Geekbench multicore, where the i5-5575R turns the tables decisively. It scores 3247 versus the i5-7500T’s 3062, a 5.7% swing in its favor. This single result is worth examining: it represents the largest delta in either direction across all eight tests, and it is the only benchmark where the older Broadwell part outperforms the Kaby Lake chip. The overall win count stands at 7-1, but the magnitude of the Geekbench multicore loss indicates that the i5-5575R is not simply outclassed; it has a genuine strength in certain multi-threaded workloads.

Synthesizing the averages, the i5-7500T’s 1483 average score sits just 0.4% above the i5-5575R’s 1478, which is effectively a statistical tie. The nearestRivals data for the i5-7500T lists the i5-5575R with a deltaPct of 0.4%, meaning the i5-7500T is only that much faster on average. Conversely, the i5-5575R’s listing shows a deltaPct of -0.4% relative to the i5-7500T. These figures confirm that neither processor has a meaningful overall performance advantage; instead, the choice hinges on workload-specific behavior, as evidenced by the Geekbench multicore discrepancy.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-7500T has an average benchmark score of 1483, while the Intel Core i5-5575R scores 1478. The i5-7500T leads by 0.4%, a negligible margin.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core i5-5575R outperform the i5-7500T?

A: The i5-5575R wins only Geekbench multicore, scoring 3247 against the i5-7500T’s 3062, a 5.7% advantage. This is the largest performance gap in either direction across all tested workloads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-7500T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-5575R has a TDP of 65 watts. The i5-7500T consumes significantly less power.

Q: Do both processors use the same memory type?

A: No. The i5-7500T supports DDR4 memory, whereas the i5-5575R supports DDR3 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions on each chip?

A: The i5-7500T features HD 630 graphics, while the i5-5575R features Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i5-5575R?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-5575R is $265. The i5-7500T does not have a listed launch MSRP in the data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different Intel microarchitectures. The i5-7500T is based on Kaby Lake, manufactured on a 14 nm process, while the i5-5575R is based on Broadwell, also on a 14 nm process. Both are built by Intel, but the Kaby Lake part is newer, with a release date of January 2017, whereas the Broadwell part launched in May 2015. The die size differs: the i5-5575R has a die size of 182 mm², while the i5-7500T does not have a listed die size in the data.

Core and thread counts are identical at 4 cores and 4 threads, and both processors have the same L1 cache of 64 KB per core and L2 cache of 256 KB per core. The L3 cache differs, however: the i5-7500T has 6 MB shared, while the i5-5575R has 4 MB shared. This 2 MB difference in L3 cache favors the i5-7500T and may contribute to its consistent wins in Cinebench tests.

Memory support is another key divider. The i5-7500T supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the i5-5575R supports DDR3 with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. The i5-7500T’s higher bandwidth and newer memory standard give it a theoretical advantage in memory-intensive tasks. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and neither supports ECC memory. The socket types are incompatible: the i5-7500T uses Intel Socket 1151, while the i5-5575R uses Intel BGA 1364. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they are not unlocked for overclocking.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. The i5-7500T carries HD 630, while the i5-5575R carries Iris Pro Graphics 6200. The latter is typically a more capable integrated solution, though the data does not include graphics benchmarks to quantify this. The production status for both is listed as Active, and both target the Desktop market segment.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-7500T is the better overall processor. It wins seven of eight head-to-head tests, including all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 runs, with margins ranging from 2.7% to 3.3%. Its average benchmark score of 1483 is higher than the i5-5575R’s 1478, and it does so with a substantially lower TDP of 35 watts versus 65 watts. The i5-7500T also offers a larger L3 cache (6 MB versus 4 MB) and faster memory bandwidth (38.4 GB/s versus 29.9 GB/s).

The i5-5575R is not without merit, though. Its Geekbench multicore score of 3247 is 5.7% higher than the i5-7500T’s 3062, which is a significant margin in that specific workload. For users whose primary applications resemble the Geekbench multicore pattern, the i5-5575R could be the better choice. However, this single win does not offset the i5-7500T’s dominance across the Cinebench suite and its power efficiency advantage.

The choice is clear for most users: the i5-7500T offers superior performance in the majority of tested scenarios, lower power consumption, and a more modern memory interface. The i5-5575R’s case rests on its Geekbench multicore victory and its Iris Pro Graphics 6200, which may appeal to users prioritizing integrated graphics performance. Without graphics benchmark data, the i5-7500T’s overall consistency makes it the recommended pick.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The base clock of the i5-5575R is 2.80 GHz, while the i5-7500T runs at 2.70 GHz, a 100 MHz difference in favor of the older chip. Both share the same boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The TDP is a major differentiator: 35 watts for the i5-7500T versus 65 watts for the i5-5575R. The socket types are entirely different, with the i5-7500T using Intel Socket 1151 and the i5-5575R using Intel BGA 1364.

The L3 cache favors the i5-7500T at 6 MB shared, compared to 4 MB shared on the i5-5575R. Memory support diverges: the i5-7500T uses DDR4 with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the i5-5575R uses DDR3 with 29.9 GB/s bandwidth. The integrated graphics are different models: HD 630 on the i5-7500T and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the i5-5575R. The release dates are also distinct, with the i5-7500T launching in January 2017 and the i5-5575R in May 2015. The die size is listed only for the i5-5575R at 182 mm². The i5-5575R has a launch MSRP of $265; the i5-7500T does not have a listed launch MSRP. Part numbers differ as well: SR337 for the i5-7500T and SR2AK for the i5-5575R.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-7500T wins in every Cinebench test—R15, R20, and R23, both multicore and single-core—with deltas of 2.7% to 3.3%. It also wins Geekbench single-core, albeit marginally at 0.6%. This makes it the superior choice for rendering workloads, which are well-represented by the Cinebench suite, and for lightly threaded applications that depend on single-core performance. Its 35-watt TDP also makes it more suitable for power-constrained systems or compact builds where thermal management is a priority.

The Intel Core i5-5575R wins Geekbench multicore by a substantial 5.7%, indicating a specific strength in certain multi-threaded workloads that the Geekbench test captures. This could translate to advantages in productivity applications or multitasking scenarios that scale with thread utilization, though the data does not specify which workloads those are. Its Iris Pro Graphics 6200 may also make it a better option for systems relying on integrated graphics, though no graphics benchmarks are provided to confirm this.

In practical terms, the i5-7500T is the safer pick for general-purpose computing, given its win count and power efficiency. The i5-5575R is the specialist choice, appealing to users who prioritize Geekbench multicore performance and potentially better integrated graphics. The average scores are so close that either processor would serve adequately, but the data leans toward the i5-7500T for most use cases.