Intel Core i5-4670T vs Intel Core i7-3610QE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a clear split between these two processors, but not in the way you might expect. The Intel Core i7-3610QE wins six of the eight head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i5-4670T takes the remaining two. The margins tell the real story.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-3610QE scores 456 against the i5-4670T's 384, a lead of 18.8%. The single-core result is nearly identical, with the i7 ahead by 18.5% (64 versus 54). Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 1903 versus 1604, again an 18.6% gap. Single-core R20 shows the same 18.6% delta (268 versus 226). Cinebench R23 continues the pattern: multi-core 4533 versus 3820 (18.7% ahead), single-core 639 versus 539 (18.6% ahead). Every Cinebench test, regardless of version or workload type, lands in the same 18.5% to 18.8% range. That consistency suggests a fundamental throughput advantage rather than a test-specific quirk.

Then Geekbench flips everything. The i5-4670T scores 2563 in multi-core against the i7-3610QE's 1954, a 23.8% advantage for the i5. Single-core is even more lopsided: 977 versus 560, meaning the i5 is 42.7% ahead. These are substantial margins, larger than any Cinebench delta in either direction. So the data says the i7 dominates in Cinebench while the i5 dominates in Geekbench, and neither chip is uniformly superior.

Looking at overall averages, the i7-3610QE posts an average benchmark score of 1297, while the i5-4670T sits at 1271. Both land at the 35th percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning they are statistically peers in aggregate performance. The nearest rivals for the i7 include the Core i5-3570K at 1293 (0.3% difference) and the Core i7-3630QM at 1289 (0.6% difference). The i5-4670T's closest neighbors are the Core i5-4430S at 1274 (0.2% difference) and the Atom x7425E at 1273 (0.2% difference). These two chips occupy the same performance tier, just with different strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench tests?

A: The Intel Core i7-3610QE wins all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, and R23, both single and multi-core) with deltas between 18.5% and 18.8%. For example, R23 multi-core shows 4533 versus 3820.

Q: Which processor is faster in Geekbench tests?

A: The Intel Core i5-4670T wins both Geekbench tests. Multi-core is 2563 versus 1954 (23.8% ahead), and single-core is 977 versus 560 (42.7% ahead).

Q: Do both processors have the same core count?

A: Yes, both have 4 physical cores. However, the i7-3610QE has 8 threads (Hyper-Threading enabled), while the i5-4670T has only 4 threads.

Q: What is the clock speed difference?

A: Both processors have a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 3.30 GHz. There is no difference in clock speeds.

Q: What socket do these CPUs use?

A: The i7-3610QE uses Intel Socket G2 (988B), which is a mobile socket. The i5-4670T uses Intel Socket 1150, which is a desktop socket.

Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both have a multiplier unlocked status of false, meaning neither supports unlocked multiplier overclocking.

Architecture Differences

The i7-3610QE is built on the Ivy Bridge architecture, while the i5-4670T uses Haswell. Both are manufactured on Intel's 22 nm process node with 1,400 million transistors. The die size differs slightly: the i7-3610QE measures 160 mm², while the i5-4670T is larger at 177 mm².

The integrated graphics differ as well. The i7-3610QE carries Intel HD 4000, while the i5-4670T steps up to Intel HD 4600. This matters for systems relying on the iGPU, as the HD 4600 is the newer implementation from the Haswell generation.

The i7-3610QE is classified as a mobile processor, while the i5-4670T is a desktop part. This affects the supported platform and motherboard ecosystem. The i7's memory bus is dual-channel, and the i5 matches that with dual-channel support. Neither supports ECC memory.

The i5-4670T explicitly lists DDR3 memory support and PCIe Gen 3, while the i7-3610QE's memory support field is not specified in the database. For a mobile part from 2012, the platform constraints are different, but the data only confirms the dual-channel memory bus for both.

Threading is the biggest architectural difference. The i7-3610QE supports 8 threads from its 4 cores, while the i5-4670T is limited to 4 threads. This explains the i7's consistent Cinebench lead, as Cinebench scales well with thread count. The i5's Haswell architecture has newer execution resources per core, which shows up in Geekbench single-core performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-3610QE | Intel Core i5-4670T |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Ivy Bridge | Haswell |

| Generation | Core i7 (Ivy Bridge) | Core i5 (Haswell) |

| Die Size | 160 mm² | 177 mm² |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Memory Support | Not specified | DDR3 |

| PCIe | Not specified | Gen 3 |

| Release Date | 2012-04-28 | 2013-06-01 |

| Part Number | SR0NP | SR14P |

Both chips share the same core count (4), base clock (2.30 GHz), boost clock (3.30 GHz), TDP (45 W), process node (22 nm), transistor count (1,400 million), L1 cache (64 KB per core), L2 cache (256 KB per core), L3 cache (6 MB shared), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (false), and unlocked multiplier (false).

The release dates are about 14 months apart, with the i7-3610QE launching in April 2012 and the i5-4670T in June 2013. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the database.

The Verdict

The data presents a nuanced picture. The i7-3610QE wins in every Cinebench workload, with margins hovering around 18.6%. If your workloads resemble Cinebench, which is rendering and content creation, the i7 is clearly the stronger choice. The extra threads (8 versus 4) provide a measurable advantage that shows up consistently across three Cinebench versions.

The i5-4670T wins decisively in Geekbench, especially single-core where it is 42.7% ahead. That is a massive margin. Geekbench tends to reflect general system responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. For everyday desktop tasks, web browsing, office work, and single-threaded software, the i5-4670T has the edge.

The average benchmark scores are close: 1297 for the i7 versus 1271 for the i5, a difference of roughly 2%. Both sit at the 35th percentile of all CPUs. They are not in different performance classes. They are two different tools for two different jobs.

The i7-3610QE is a mobile chip, so it belongs in laptops or compact mobile workstations. The i5-4670T is a desktop chip for Socket 1150. Platform compatibility should be the first filter. If you already own a Socket 1150 board, the i5-4670T is the drop-in option. If you need a mobile replacement or upgrade on Socket G2, the i7-3610QE is your only choice from this pair.

Neither chip is unlocked, so overclocking is off the table for both. The TDP is identical at 45 W, so thermals and power draw are comparable. The i5 has a newer iGPU (HD 4600 versus HD 4000) and explicit DDR3 support with PCIe Gen 3, which makes it the more modern platform overall.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i7-3610QE wins for: Multi-threaded rendering workloads. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 all show the i7 ahead by 18.5% to 18.8% in both single and multi-core tests. The 8-thread configuration gives it a real advantage in any application that can use more than 4 threads. Content creators running render tasks, video encoding, or batch processing will see the i7 come out ahead. The mobile form factor also means it suits laptop builds where socket compatibility matters.

Intel Core i5-4670T wins for: Geekbench-style workloads that favor per-core efficiency. The single-core score of 977 versus 560 is a 42.7% gap, which is enormous. This translates to snappier response in single-threaded applications, legacy software, and anything that does not scale across cores. The multi-core Geekbench advantage of 23.8% (2563 versus 1954) further reinforces that the Haswell cores are more efficient per thread. Desktop users on Socket 1150 with DDR3 memory and PCIe Gen 3 support will prefer the i5 for everyday computing and general productivity.

Tie-breaker: If you cannot decide based on workload, note that the i5-4670T has the newer architecture (Haswell versus Ivy Bridge), a larger die (177 mm² versus 160 mm²), and a more capable integrated GPU (HD 4600 versus HD 4000). It also has explicit DDR3 and PCIe Gen 3 support in the database. The i7-3610QE only wins if you specifically need 8 threads or require a mobile socket. For a desktop system, the i5-4670T is the more complete package. For a mobile system, the i7-3610QE is the only applicable choice from this comparison.