Intel Core i5-4590T vs Intel Core i7-3820QM Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-4590T

CORE STATE Haswell
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2000 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Haswell
nm
PROCESS 22 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2014
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-3820QM

CORE STATE Ivy Bridge
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Ivy Bridge
nm
PROCESS 22 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2012

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
347
481
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
1,446
2,006
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
204
283
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
3,445
4,777
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
486
674
geekbench_multicore
2,540
2,041
geekbench_singlecore
911
601
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
67

Analysis: Intel Core i5-4590T vs Intel Core i7-3820QM

The Intel Core i7-3820QM and Intel Core i5-4590T are two processors from different generations and market segments. The i7-3820QM is a mobile part from the Ivy Bridge generation, while the i5-4590T is a desktop part from Haswell. Both are built on the same 22 nm process with 1,400 million transistors, but they diverge in core configuration, cache, and integrated graphics. Benchmark results show a clear split: the i7 wins all five Cinebench tests, while the i5 wins both Geekbench tests. The i7 takes 5 of 7 head-to-head wins.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data covers seven benchmarks. The i7-3820QM wins five, the i5-4590T wins two. The i7's wins are all in Cinebench, with margins between 38.6% and 38.7%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7 scores 481 against 347, a 38.6% lead. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the i7 scores 2006 against 1446, a 38.7% lead. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the i7 scores 283 against 204, a 38.7% lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7 scores 4777 against 3445, a 38.7% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i7 scores 674 against 486, a 38.7% lead.

The i5's wins are in Geekbench. In Geekbench multi-core, the i5 scores 2540 against 2041, a 19.6% lead. In Geekbench single-core, the i5 scores 911 against 601, a 34% lead. The consistency of the i7's Cinebench advantage is striking. All five tests show nearly identical deltas, suggesting a fundamental performance gap in that workload. The i5's Geekbench advantage is also large, especially in single-core where it leads by 34%. The i7's thread count of 8 versus 4 aligns with its multi-core Cinebench advantage, but the single-core Cinebench lead is just as large, indicating that the i7's architecture is simply faster in that test suite.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the i7-3820QM is the stronger part for Cinebench-style workloads. It leads in all five Cinebench tests, with a minimum margin of 38.6%. The i5-4590T is the stronger part for Geekbench-style workloads, leading by 19.6% in multi-core and 34% in single-core. The i7's wins are concentrated in rendering and CPU stress tests, while the i5's wins are in general-purpose performance tests. Users who prioritize Cinebench results should choose the i7; those who prioritize Geekbench results should choose the i5. The i5's Geekbench single-core score of 911 is 34% higher than the i7's 601, despite the i7 having a higher boost clock of 3.70 GHz compared to 3.00 GHz. This suggests that the i5's Haswell architecture is more efficient in that specific benchmark, even though the i7 has a higher peak frequency.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 22 nm process and contain 1,400 million transistors. The i7-3820QM uses the Ivy Bridge architecture, while the i5-4590T uses Haswell. The die size differs: the i7 measures 160 mm², the i5 measures 177 mm². The i7 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, the i5 has 6 MB. The i5 supports DDR3 memory and has a listed memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the i7 has no memory support or bandwidth data. The i5 also lists PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7 has no PCIe data. Integrated graphics differ: the i7 has Intel HD 4000, the i5 has Intel HD 4600. The i7 uses socket Intel BGA 1224 and is a mobile part; the i5 uses Intel Socket 1150 and is a desktop part. The i7 has a TDP of 45 W, the i5 has a TDP of 35 W. The i7 has 8 threads, the i5 has 4. The i7 was released on 2012-04-28, the i5 on 2014-05-10. The i5 is marked as end-of-life, while the i7's production status is not listed.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has higher multi-core performance?

A: The i7-3820QM leads in all Cinebench multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 4777 against 3445, a 38.7% advantage.

Q: Which CPU wins in Geekbench?

A: The i5-4590T wins both Geekbench tests. It scores 2540 vs 2041 in multi-core and 911 vs 601 in single-core.

Q: How many threads does each CPU have?

A: The i7-3820QM has 8 threads, while the i5-4590T has 4 threads.

Q: What are the TDPs?

A: The i7-3820QM has a TDP of 45 W, the i5-4590T has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The i7-3820QM has 8 MB shared L3, the i5-4590T has 6 MB shared.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear split. The i7-3820QM is the better choice for Cinebench-based workloads, with a consistent 38.7% lead across all Cinebench tests. The i5-4590T is the better choice for Geekbench-based workloads, with a 34% lead in single-core and 19.6% in multi-core. The i7 offers more threads and more L3 cache, while the i5 offers a lower TDP and a desktop socket. The i5 is end-of-life, while the i7's production status is not listed. Users should select based on which benchmark suite matches their application.

Specification Differences

| Specification | i7-3820QM | i5-4590T |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 | 2000.00 |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 | 3.00 |

| TDP | 45 | 35 |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1224 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Ivy Bridge | Haswell |

| Codename | Ivy Bridge | Haswell |

| Generation | Core i7 (Ivy Bridge) | Core i5 (Haswell) |

| Die Size | 160 mm² | 177 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | Not listed | DDR3 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 25.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Not listed | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Not listed | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2012-04-28 | 2014-05-10 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $192 |

| Part Number | SR0MK | SR1S6 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-4590T
i7-3820QM
Core Specs
Cores
4
4 0.0%
Threads
4
8 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2,000
2.7 -99.9%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
3.7 +23.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2,000
2.7 -99.9%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
3.7 +23.3%
Multiplier
30
27 -10.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
6 MB (shared)
8 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
45 +28.6%
Architecture
Architecture
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Codename
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Generation
Core i5 (Haswell)
Core i7 (Ivy Bridge)
Process Size
22 nm
22 nm
Transistors
1,400 million
1,400 million
Die Size
177 mm²
160 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR3
—
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1150
Intel BGA 1224
Chipsets
Intel 8 Series, Intel 9 Series
—
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Intel HD 4600
Intel HD 4000
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
End-of-life
—
Launch Price
$192
—
Part Number
SR1S6
SR0MK
Package
FC-LGA12C
FC-BGA12F
View Core i5-4590T Details View Core i7-3820QM Details