CPU Comparison

The benchmark data clearly separates these two processors, with the Intel Processor N95 winning every head-to-head comparison, though the margin varies dramatically by workload. The N95's most decisive victory comes in single-core performance, where it more than doubles the Core i5-4570TE's score, while its multi-core advantage shrinks to a narrow 3.3% in the latest Cinebench version. The Core i5-4570TE, despite being a decade older and having a higher TDP, remains competitive in multi-threaded tasks but falls far behind in single-threaded responsiveness.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Intel Processor N95 scores 914 against the Core i5-4570TE's 378, a 141.8% advantage. This is not a marginal improvement; it is a generational leap in per-thread efficiency. For everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, or light productivity, this single-core dominance translates directly into snappier interface response and faster application loading. The N95's Gracemont architecture is fundamentally more efficient at executing instructions than the aging Haswell design.

Multi-core results tell a more nuanced story. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the N95 scores 2769 versus the i5-4570TE's 2681, a modest 3.3% lead. The N95's four physical cores match the i5's two cores plus Hyper-Threading (four threads total), but the i5's higher 35W TDP allows it to sustain closer performance in sustained multi-threaded loads. However, the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a much larger gap: the N95 scores 445 versus 270 for the i5, a 64.8% difference. This suggests that as workloads scale, the N95's efficiency advantage grows, particularly in shorter bursts where its Gracemont cores can boost aggressively.

Notably, the Core i5-4570TE has benchmark scores in Cinebench R20 (1126 multi-core, 158 single-core) and Geekbench (1857 multi-core, 966 single-core) that the N95 lacks. These missing data points prevent a complete comparison, but the available R23 results are consistent: the N95 leads in both single and multi-core. The N95's average benchmark score of 1070 slightly edges out the i5's 1062, placing both in the 29th percentile of all CPUs. This means both processors are entry-level performers by modern standards, but the N95 does so with significantly less power draw.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. The Intel Processor N95 uses the Gracemont architecture on a 10 nm process node, while the Core i5-4570TE uses Haswell on a 22 nm process. This process shrink is the primary driver of the N95's efficiency: it delivers similar multi-core performance at 15W TDP versus the i5's 35W TDP. The N95 features four Gracemont efficiency cores, while the i5 has two Haswell cores with Hyper-Threading, yielding four threads on both. However, the N95's cache layout is fundamentally different: it has 96 KB L1 per core and 2 MB shared L2, plus 6 MB shared L3. The i5 offers 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3. The N95's larger shared L3 and modern cache hierarchy contribute to its single-core advantage.

Memory support further separates them. The N95 supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a single-channel memory bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The i5 is limited to DDR3 with a dual-channel bus, though its memory bandwidth figure is not provided in the data. The N95 also features PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only), while the i5 has PCIe Gen 3 with no lane count specified. Integrated graphics differ as well: the N95 uses UHD Graphics 710, while the i5 uses Intel HD 4600. The N95 is a mobile segment processor on Intel BGA 1264, while the i5 is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1150. The i5 has a known part number (SR172) and includes 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die, while the N95's transistor count and die size are not listed.

The Verdict

The Intel Processor N95 is the clear winner based on all available head-to-head benchmarks. It wins every test, and its single-core dominance (141.8% ahead in R23) makes it the better choice for any workload that prioritizes responsiveness. The N95 also achieves this with a 15W TDP, less than half the i5's 35W TDP, meaning it is substantially more power-efficient. For users building a low-power system or a compact mobile device, the N95's architecture and memory support (DDR4/DDR5 versus DDR3) offer a more modern foundation.

The Core i5-4570TE is not without merit. Its multi-core R23 score trails by only 3.3%, which means for heavily threaded tasks that can use all four threads, the i5 is nearly as fast. Its dual-channel memory bus may provide bandwidth advantages in certain memory-sensitive workloads, though the N95's higher raw bandwidth figure (38.4 GB/s) suggests otherwise. However, the i5's 22 nm process and 35W TDP make it obsolete for new designs. The N95's 10 nm process and active production status indicate it is the forward-looking choice. The i5's production status is not listed, suggesting it may be discontinued.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Processor N95 | Intel Core i5-4570TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 2 |

| Threads | 4 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 100.00 MHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| TDP | 15W | 35W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Gracemont | Haswell |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 22 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 1,400 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 177 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2023-01-02 | 2013-06-01 |

| Part Number | Not listed | SR172 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: The Intel Processor N95 wins decisively, scoring 914 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus the Core i5-4570TE's 378, a 141.8% advantage.

Q: How close are they in multi-core performance?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the N95 scores 2769 versus the i5's 2681, a narrow 3.3% lead. However, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the N95 leads by 64.8% (445 versus 270).

Q: Which processor supports newer memory types?

A: The Intel Processor N95 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core i5-4570TE supports only DDR3. The N95 also lists a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the i5 does not specify one.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Intel Processor N95 has a TDP of 15W, while the Core i5-4570TE has a TDP of 35W. The N95 is more than twice as power-efficient.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Processor N95 uses a 10 nm process, while the Core i5-4570TE uses a 22 nm process. The N95's smaller node contributes to its efficiency gains.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both sit at the 29th percentile of all CPUs. The N95 has an average benchmark score of 1070, slightly above the i5's 1062.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Processor N95 wins in every benchmark category where both were tested. Its single-core lead (141.8% in R23) makes it the superior choice for any application that is not perfectly multi-threaded, this includes most desktop productivity software, web browsers, and operating system tasks. The N95's 10 nm process and 15W TDP make it ideal for fanless or low-power designs, mobile devices, and embedded systems where heat and power constraints are paramount. Its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory ensures compatibility with modern components, and its active production status guarantees ongoing availability.

The Core i5-4570TE retains a narrow relevance in heavily multi-threaded workloads, where its 3.3% R23 multi-core deficit is nearly negligible. For a desktop system with an existing LGA 1150 motherboard and DDR3 memory, the i5 could be a drop-in upgrade path, though its 35W TDP and 22 nm process make it inefficient by modern standards. Its dual-channel memory bus may offer some advantage in memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but the N95's higher specified bandwidth (38.4 GB/s) counters this. The i5's integrated HD 4600 graphics are older than the N95's UHD 710, so any graphics-intensive workload favors the N95. In short, the N95 wins on performance, efficiency, and modernity; the i5 only wins on compatibility with aging platforms.