Intel Core i5-4570TE vs Intel Core i7-2760QM Comparison

The Intel Core i5-4570TE and the Intel Core i7-2760QM represent two distinctly different approaches to processor design, separated by two years of architectural evolution. The data shows a clear split: the i7-2760QM dominates in Cinebench workloads, while the i5-4570TE counters with significant wins in Geekbench tests. Both processors sit at the 29th percentile of all CPUs, with nearly identical average benchmark scores of 1062 and 1057 respectively, indicating they occupy a similar performance tier despite their contrasting designs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head data is the consistent 26.2 percent advantage held by the Intel Core i7-2760QM across all Cinebench multicore tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-2760QM scores 366 against the i5-4570TE’s 270, and that exact 26.2 percent delta repeats in Cinebench R20 multicore (1525 vs 1126) and Cinebench R23 multicore (3631 vs 2681). This uniformity suggests a fixed architectural advantage rather than workload-specific variance — the i7-2760QM’s four physical cores and eight threads simply outmuscle the i5-4570TE’s two cores and four threads in rendering tasks that scale with core count.

Single-core Cinebench results tell a similar story, though with a slightly different margin. The i7-2760QM leads by 26.5 percent in Cinebench R20 single-core (215 vs 158) and by 26.2 percent in Cinebench R23 single-core (512 vs 378). This is notable because single-threaded performance typically favors newer architectures; the i5-4570TE’s Haswell design is two generations newer than the i7-2760QM’s Sandy Bridge, yet it still trails in these tests. The i7-2760QM’s higher boost clock of 3.50 GHz compared to the i5-4570TE’s 3.30 GHz likely contributes to this result, as does the older processor’s larger 6 MB shared L3 cache.

The Geekbench results reverse the trend dramatically, and here the i5-4570TE establishes its strongest claim. In Geekbench single-core, the i5-4570TE scores 966 against the i7-2760QM’s 534, an 80.9 percent advantage — the largest delta in the entire comparison. The Geekbench multicore test also favors the i5-4570TE, with a score of 1857 versus 1625, a 14.3 percent lead. This apparent contradiction — losing Cinebench but winning Geekbench — reflects differences in how the two benchmark suites weight memory latency, branch prediction, and instruction-level parallelism, all of which benefit from the Haswell architecture’s improvements over Sandy Bridge.

The win tally stands at 2 for the i5-4570TE and 5 for the i7-2760QM, but the magnitude of the wins matters more than the count. The i7-2760QM’s victories are consistent but modest in percentage terms, while the i5-4570TE’s single-core Geekbench win is a decisive outlier that suggests a qualitative advantage in latency-sensitive workloads. The average benchmark scores reinforce this parity: 1062 for the i5-4570TE versus 1057 for the i7-2760QM, a difference of less than half a percent.

Nearest-rival comparisons provide additional context for each processor’s standing. The i5-4570TE’s closest rival is the Intel Core i3-4360 at 1061 (0.1 percent delta), with the AMD Opteron 4376 HE also at 1061 and the Intel Xeon W3580 at 1064 slightly ahead. The i7-2760QM’s nearest rival is the Intel Pentium G4600 at 1056 (0.1 percent delta), with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and Intel Core i3-4350 both at 1058. These rival clusters show that neither processor has a meaningful edge over its immediate competition — both sit in a crowded performance band where 0.1 to 0.2 percent deltas are the norm.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion for most workloads: the Intel Core i7-2760QM is the stronger processor for multi-threaded rendering and compute tasks, evidenced by its 26.2 percent lead across the entire Cinebench suite. Its 4 cores and 8 threads provide double the parallel execution capacity of the i5-4570TE’s 2 cores and 4 threads, and the benchmark results confirm that this translates directly into real-world performance for threaded applications. Anyone prioritizing Cinebench-style workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computation — should favor the i7-2760QM without hesitation.

However, the i5-4570TE’s 80.9 percent advantage in Geekbench single-core and 14.3 percent lead in Geekbench multicore indicate that it handles general-purpose computing tasks with noticeably more efficiency. This suggests that for everyday desktop use, web browsing, office applications, and other latency-sensitive workloads, the i5-4570TE may deliver a snappier experience despite having fewer cores. The Haswell architecture’s newer design, on a 22 nm node versus the i7-2760QM’s 32 nm node, brings IPC improvements that show up clearly in the Geekbench results.

The production status field reveals one practical consideration: the i7-2760QM is marked as end-of-life, while the i5-4570TE carries no such designation. For system builders choosing between the two today, this may influence availability and long-term supportability. The i5-4570TE also consumes less power at 35 W TDP versus 45 W TDP, which could matter in thermally constrained environments.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-2760QM wins decisively in any workload that leverages multiple cores and threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 3631 versus 2681 represents a 35.4 percent raw performance advantage, and the consistent 26.2 percent delta across all Cinebench multicore tests confirms this is a systematic edge. Video editors, 3D modelers, and developers compiling large codebases will see measurable gains from the i7-2760QM’s additional cores. Its 6 MB shared L3 cache also provides more on-die storage for working sets in threaded applications.

The i5-4570TE wins in single-threaded and latency-sensitive scenarios. The 80.9 percent Geekbench single-core advantage — 966 versus 534 — is the single largest performance gap in this comparison, and it speaks to the Haswell core’s superior instruction handling and memory subsystem. Applications that rely on quick response times, such as interactive design tools, spreadsheet calculations, or even older games that scale poorly across cores, will benefit from the i5-4570TE’s architecture. Its 14.3 percent lead in Geekbench multicore — despite having half the cores — further indicates that its per-thread efficiency can sometimes overcome the i7-2760QM’s thread count advantage.

The i5-4570TE also holds advantages in platform integration. Its PCIe Gen 3 support and Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics represent newer I/O and display technology compared to the i7-2760QM’s older infrastructure. The 22 nm process node and smaller 177 mm² die size suggest better manufacturing efficiency than the i7-2760QM’s 32 nm node and 216 mm² die.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-2760QM has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-4570TE has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The i7-2760QM scores 3631 in Cinebench R23 multicore versus the i5-4570TE’s 2681, a 26.2 percent advantage for the i7-2760QM.

Q: Which processor wins in Geekbench single-core, and by how much?

A: The i5-4570TE wins Geekbench single-core with a score of 966 against the i7-2760QM’s 534, an 80.9 percent advantage.

Q: Are both processors at the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the i5-4570TE and the i7-2760QM are at the 29th percentile of all CPUs, with average benchmark scores of 1062 and 1057 respectively.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The i5-4570TE has a TDP of 35 W, while the i7-2760QM has a TDP of 45 W.

Q: Which processor is marked as end-of-life?

A: The Intel Core i7-2760QM has a production status of end-of-life, while the i5-4570TE does not have this designation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations, which explains much of the performance divergence. The i5-4570TE uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process node from Intel’s foundry, while the i7-2760QM uses the older Sandy Bridge architecture on a 32 nm node. This process shrink allowed Haswell to pack 1,400 million transistors into a 177 mm² die, compared to Sandy Bridge’s 1,160 million transistors spread across a larger 216 mm² die — a 17.1 percent reduction in die size while accommodating 20.7 percent more transistors.

Cache configurations differ as well. Both processors share 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, but the i7-2760QM has 6 MB of shared L3 cache versus the i5-4570TE’s 4 MB. The larger L3 cache on the i7-2760QM likely contributes to its Cinebench performance, as more frequently accessed data can remain on-die. The i5-4570TE compensates with architectural improvements that reduce cache misses and improve branch prediction efficiency, which shows in its Geekbench scores.

Integrated graphics mark another generational difference. The i5-4570TE ships with Intel HD 4600, while the i7-2760QM features Intel HD 3000. The HD 4600 represents a significant graphics architecture advancement, though neither processor is positioned for serious gaming workloads. The i5-4570TE also supports PCIe Gen 3, whereas the i7-2760QM’s PCIe information is not listed in the benchmark data.

The i5-4570TE’s market segment is Desktop, while the i7-2760QM is classified as Mobile. This distinction affects socket compatibility — the i5-4570TE uses Intel Socket 1150, and the i7-2760QM uses Intel BGA 1224 — and has implications for upgrade paths and system integration.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds favor the i7-2760QM at the top end. The i7-2760QM has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.50 GHz, whereas the i5-4570TE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The i5-4570TE starts faster at base frequency, but the i7-2760QM can reach a higher peak under boost conditions.

Core and thread counts form the most critical specification gap. The i7-2760QM offers 4 cores and 8 threads, doubling the i5-4570TE’s 2 cores and 4 threads. This directly explains the i7-2760QM’s dominance in Cinebench multicore tests, where additional parallel execution units provide a compounding advantage.

Power consumption differs by 10 W, with the i5-4570TE rated at 35 W TDP and the i7-2760QM at 45 W TDP. The i5-4570TE’s lower power draw is consistent with its smaller die and newer manufacturing process, making it a more efficient choice for thermally sensitive systems.

Socket compatibility separates the two entirely. The i5-4570TE fits Intel Socket 1150, while the i7-2760QM requires Intel BGA 1224, meaning they are not interchangeable in any system. The i7-2760QM’s mobile classification and BGA socket indicate it is soldered to the motherboard, while the i5-4570TE’s desktop socket offers more flexibility.

Memory support is listed as DDR3 for the i5-4570TE, while the i7-2760QM’s memory support field contains no data. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The release dates are roughly 21 months apart, with the i5-4570TE launching on 2013-06-01 and the i7-2760QM on 2011-09-03.