Intel Core i5-4570TE vs Intel Core i5-5287U Comparison

The Intel Core i5-5287U and Intel Core i5-4570TE are both dual-core, four-thread processors from Intel, but they target different segments of the market. The 5287U is a Broadwell-U mobile part designed for laptops, while the 4570TE is a Haswell desktop processor with an embedded focus. Both share the same 3.30 GHz boost clock, yet their underlying designs, power envelopes, and platform support lead to distinct performance profiles. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the desktop chip wins in Cinebench workloads, while the mobile chip takes the lead in Geekbench tests. This page breaks down where each processor excels, what separates them architecturally, and which one the recorded measurements favor for specific tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The division of wins is stark. Out of seven head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Core i5-4570TE takes five victories, while the Intel Core i5-5287U claims two. However, the pattern of these wins tells a more interesting story than the raw count.

The 4570TE dominates the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 270 against 261 for the 5287U, a 3.3% advantage. The gap holds steady across newer Cinebench versions: R20 multicore shows 1126 versus 1090, a 3.2% lead, and R23 multicore shows 2681 versus 2596, also 3.2% ahead. Single-core Cinebench results follow the same trend, with the 4570TE posting 158 in R20 and 378 in R23, compared to 153 and 366 for the 5287U, each a 3.2% margin. These are consistent, if modest, advantages across the entire Cinebench lineage.

The 5287U, by contrast, wins decisively in Geekbench. In Geekbench multicore, it scores 2007 against 1857 for the 4570TE, an 8.1% advantage. In Geekbench single-core, it posts 1029 versus 966, a 6.5% lead. These are larger margins than the Cinebench differences, suggesting the mobile chip has a specific strength in the workloads Geekbench emphasizes.

What does this imply? Cinebench is a rendering workload that stresses sustained multi-threaded performance and memory throughput. The 4570TE, with its larger 4 MB shared L3 cache and desktop-oriented design, handles this consistently better. Geekbench, which mixes integer, floating-point, and memory tasks with shorter bursts, appears to favor the 5287U, likely due to its newer Broadwell architecture and the efficiency of its 14 nm process. The data indicates that users running rendering or CPU-intensive sustained tasks should lean toward the 4570TE, while those whose workloads resemble Geekbench's mixed pattern may find the 5287U faster.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and process nodes. The Intel Core i5-5287U is built on Broadwell, specifically the Broadwell-U variant, using a 14 nm process. It contains 1,900 million transistors packed into a 133 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-4570TE is a Haswell part on a 22 nm process, with 1,400 million transistors on a larger 177 mm² die. The younger process node gives the 5287U a density advantage, but the 4570TE compensates with a larger L3 cache.

Cache configurations differ meaningfully. Both processors have 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache is where they diverge. The 5287U has 3 MB shared, while the 4570TE has 4 MB shared. That extra megabyte of cache is likely a factor in the 4570TE's Cinebench wins, as rendering workloads often benefit from larger cache footprints to reduce memory stalls.

Clock speeds are nearly identical. The 5287U has a 2.90 GHz base clock and 3.30 GHz boost, while the 4570TE has a 2.70 GHz base clock and the same 3.30 GHz boost. The higher base clock of the mobile chip gives it an edge in lighter, bursty workloads, which may explain its Geekbench performance. The boost clocks matching means peak single-thread performance is theoretically similar, but measured results differ.

Power envelopes are a major differentiator. The 5287U carries a 28 W TDP, while the 4570TE is rated at 35 W. The mobile part is more power-efficient, which aligns with its segment, but the desktop chip uses its higher budget to sustain performance. The 5287U also has a smaller memory bandwidth figure of 29.9 GB/s, while the 4570TE has no recorded memory bandwidth in the database, though both support dual-channel DDR3.

Platform support separates them further. The 5287U uses an Intel BGA 1168 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard, typical for ultraportable laptops. The 4570TE uses Intel Socket 1150, a standard desktop socket that allows for replacement. PCIe support also differs: the 5287U offers Gen 2 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the 4570TE offers Gen 3. The newer PCIe generation on the desktop part provides more bandwidth for expansion cards.

Integrated graphics are another contrast. The 5287U pairs with Intel Iris 6100, while the 4570TE uses Intel HD 4600. The Iris 6100 is the higher-tier integrated solution, which could be relevant for users relying on the iGPU. The 4570TE has a release date of June 2013, while the 5287U arrived later in February 2015, reflecting the generational gap.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Walking through the seven recorded benchmarks reveals the performance landscape in detail. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the 4570TE scores 270, and the 5287U scores 261. The 3.3% difference is the largest Cinebench margin in favor of the desktop chip. This test is a classic multi-threaded render, so the result suggests the 4570TE sustains higher throughput across all four threads.

Cinebench R20 multicore shows the same story with 1126 versus 1090, a 3.2% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore repeats it with 2681 versus 2596, again 3.2%. The consistency across versions is notable; it is not a single-test artifact but a repeatable trend in rendering workloads. Single-core Cinebench results mirror this: R20 single-core gives 158 versus 153, and R23 single-core gives 378 versus 366, both 3.2% in favor of the 4570TE.

The Geekbench tests flip the script. In Geekbench multicore, the 5287U scores 2007, beating the 4570TE's 1857 by 8.1%. This is the largest margin in any test, and it is significant because Geekbench multicore also exercises all threads. The fact that the mobile chip wins here while losing in Cinebench suggests the two suites stress different aspects of the memory hierarchy or instruction scheduling.

Geekbench single-core continues the trend: 1029 for the 5287U versus 966 for the 4570TE, a 6.5% lead. The mobile chip's advantage in single-threaded Geekbench, despite matching boost clocks, points to architectural efficiency gains from the Broadwell generation. The 14 nm process and newer microarchitecture likely execute instructions more efficiently per clock, even at the same 3.30 GHz boost.

The average benchmark scores reflect the overall split. The 5287U has an average benchmark score of 1072, and the 4570TE sits at 1062. Despite losing five of seven head-to-head tests, the mobile chip has a higher average, driven by its large Geekbench wins. This is a reminder that averaging across different suites can obscure the workload-dependent nature of performance. The percentile rankings are close too: the 5287U sits at the 30th percentile among all CPUs, while the 4570TE is at the 29th.

Nearest rivals add context. The 5287U's closest competitor is the Intel Core i3-4170T with a matching average score of 1072, a 0% delta. The AMD Athlon X4 880K and AMD Opteron 3380 are also near, each at 1071 with a 0.1% delta. The Intel Core i5-2310 trails by 0.1% with a 1073 score. For the 4570TE, the AMD Opteron 4376 HE matches at 1061 with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core i5-2380P is 0.1% ahead at 1063, and the Intel Core i3-4360 and Intel Xeon W3580 complete the immediate grouping. These rivals are all older or lower-tier parts, which positions both chips in the mid-range of the performance spectrum from that era.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570TE scores 2681 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Intel Core i5-5287U scores 2596. The desktop chip leads by 3.2%.

Q: Why does the Intel Core i5-5287U win in Geekbench?

A: The 5287U scores 2007 in Geekbench multicore and 1029 in single-core, beating the 4570TE's 1857 and 966. Its 14 nm Broadwell architecture and higher 2.90 GHz base clock likely contribute to these wins.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 2 cores and 4 threads. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Q: How does the L3 cache differ between the two?

A: The 5287U has 3 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 4570TE has 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger cache on the desktop part may help in rendering workloads.

Q: What are the power ratings for each chip?

A: The 5287U has a 28 W TDP, and the 4570TE has a 35 W TDP. The mobile chip is more power-efficient.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The 5287U has an average benchmark score of 1072, slightly above the 4570TE's 1062. The 5287U also ranks at the 30th percentile, one percentile point higher than the 4570TE.

The Verdict

The data points to a workload-dependent choice. If the primary use case is sustained rendering, video encoding, or any CPU-heavy batch processing, the Intel Core i5-4570TE is the better option. It wins every Cinebench test by 3.2% to 3.3%, and the larger 4 MB L3 cache provides a measurable edge in these sustained workloads. The 35 W TDP, higher than the mobile chip's 28 W, supports this sustained output.

If the workload is mixed computing with varied tasks, the Intel Core i5-5287U wins where it matters most. Its Geekbench leads of 8.8% in multicore and 6.5% in single-core show strengths in latency-sensitive and bursty workloads. The 14 nm process node and the higher 2.90 GHz base clock are the likely drivers of this performance. Its 133 mm² die size and 1,900 million transistors also indicate a more modern design that extracts more efficiency per clock.

Users on a desktop platform with an Intel Socket 1150 motherboard should consider the 4570TE, which also brings PCIe Gen 3 support. Users on a mobile platform with Intel BGA 1168 are limited to the 5287U, which offers the stronger integrated graphics with Intel Iris 6100. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both use DDR3. The 5287U was released in February 2015, while the 4570TE came earlier in June 2013, making the mobile part the newer design despite its mobile focus.

The average benchmark scores are close, 1072 for the 5287U and 1062 for the 4570TE, and the percentile ranks are nearly identical at 30 and 29. This indicates that for general-purpose use, the two are comparable overall. The specific benchmark suite matters more than the average. The 4570TE is the pick for Cinebench-style workloads, and the 5287U is the pick for Geekbench-style workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several specifications: both are Intel parts with 2 cores and 4 threads, both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, both support dual-channel DDR3, neither supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The differences are what define their character.

The 5287U has a 2.90 GHz base clock, while the 4570TE has a 2.70 GHz base clock. Their boost clocks are identical at 3.30 GHz. The 5287U has a 28 W TDP, the 4570TE has a 35 W TDP. The 5287U uses an Intel BGA 1168 socket, the 4570TE uses Intel Socket 1150. Architecture differs: the 5287U is Broadwell on a 14 nm process, the 4570TE is Haswell on a 22 nm process. The 5287U has 1,900 million transistors and a 133 mm² die, while the 4570TE has 1,400 million transistors and a 177 mm² die. L3 cache is 3 MB on the 5287U and 4 MB on the 4570TE. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 29.9 GB/s for the 5287U, with no figure listed for the 4570TE. PCIe support is Gen 2 with 12 lanes on the 5287U and Gen 3 on the 4570TE. Integrated graphics are Intel Iris 6100 on the 5287U and Intel HD 4600 on the 4570TE. The market segment is Mobile for the 5287U and Desktop for the 4570TE. Release dates are February 2015 for the mobile part and June 2013 for the desktop part. The 5287U has a launch MSRP of $315; no launch MSRP is recorded for the 4570TE. Part numbers are SR26H for the 5287U and SR172 for the 4570TE.