Intel Core i5-4570S vs Intel Core i7-4710HQ Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i7-4710HQ and the Intel Core i5-4570S shows a clear split across test suites. In Cinebench workloads, the i7-4710HQ dominates every single test, while in Geekbench, the i5-4570S takes both wins. The recorded data shows the i7-4710HQ winning 6 out of 8 head-to-head tests, with the i5-4570S claiming the remaining 2.

Starting with Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-4710HQ scores 472 against the i5-4570S's 428, a 10.3% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a nearly identical pattern: 66 versus 60, a 10% lead for the mobile i7. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 1970 versus 1787, again a 10.2% margin. The single-core R20 test shows 278 against 252, a 10.3% gap. In Cinebench R23, the largest absolute difference appears: 4692 versus 4256 in multicore, a 10.2% lead, and 662 versus 600 in single-core, a 10.3% margin.

The i5-4570S fights back in Geekbench. The multicore test shows 2945 for the desktop chip versus 2694 for the mobile part, an 8.5% advantage. The single-core Geekbench result is even more decisive: 1083 versus 947, meaning the i5-4570S leads by 12.6%. These Geekbench wins are notable because they reverse the trend seen across all three Cinebench generations.

Interpreting the numbers, the i7-4710HQ's Cinebench lead is consistent at roughly 10% across every variant, suggesting a structural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The i5-4570S's Geekbench margin, however, is larger in percentage terms, reaching double digits in the single-core test. The average benchmark score tells a similar story: the i7-4710HQ sits at 1473 with a 38th percentile among all CPUs, while the i5-4570S averages 1426 and lands in the 37th percentile. The i7-4710HQ's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-5575R, scores 1478, just 0.3% higher. The i5-4570S's closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-3820, sits at 1424, only 0.2% above.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Haswell architecture and are built on Intel's 22 nm process node, each containing 1,400 million transistors. The critical divergence begins with the codename and die size. The i7-4710HQ uses the Crystalwell codename and has a die size of 264 mm², while the i5-4570S uses the standard Haswell codename with a much smaller die at 177 mm². This 87 mm² difference reflects the additional integrated components in the mobile flagship.

The core configurations diverge significantly. Both have 4 physical cores, but the i7-4710HQ supports 8 threads through Hyper-Threading, while the i5-4570S is limited to 4 threads. This explains the consistent Cinebench multicore advantage for the i7. Clock speeds also differ: the i7-4710HQ runs a 2.50 GHz base and 3.50 GHz boost, whereas the i5-4570S starts higher at 2.90 GHz base and reaches 3.60 GHz boost. The higher base clock on the i5-4570S contributes to its Geekbench single-core win.

Cache layouts are identical in structure: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support matches as DDR3 with a dual-channel bus. The i7-4710HQ lists a memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the i5-4570S leaves this field unrecorded in the database. Both lack ECC memory support and both feature the Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. PCIe support differs slightly: the i7-4710HQ specifies Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-4570S simply lists Gen 3 without lane details.

The market segments separate these parts clearly. The i7-4710HQ targets mobile platforms with a 47 W TDP and uses the Intel BGA 1364 socket. The i5-4570S is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP on the Intel Socket 1150. The i7-4710HQ carries the part number SR1PX and is marked as end-of-life, while the i5-4570S uses SR14J with no production status recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion for multi-threaded productivity: the Intel Core i7-4710HQ is the stronger choice. Its 8 threads deliver a consistent 10.2% to 10.3% advantage across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests. For users running rendering workloads, video encoding, or compilation tasks that scale with thread count, this processor holds a measurable edge. The single-core Cinebench results also favor the i7-4710HQ by about 10%, which is surprising given the i5-4570S's higher boost clock.

The Intel Core i5-4570S wins in Geekbench, particularly in single-core performance where it leads by 12.6%. This suggests that for applications relying on Geekbench-style workloads, especially those sensitive to per-core efficiency, the desktop chip responds better. Its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.50 GHz likely plays a role, as does the absence of Hyper-Threading overhead in certain tasks.

The overall percentiles are nearly identical: 38th for the i7-4710HQ versus 37th for the i5-4570S. The average scores (1473 versus 1426) show a 3.3% gap favoring the mobile part. Users should note that the i7-4710HQ is mobile-only with a BGA socket, while the i5-4570S fits desktop motherboards. The TDP difference (47 W versus 65 W) means the i7-4710HQ is more power-efficient despite delivering higher Cinebench scores. The i5-4570S offers a larger die in reverse: 177 mm² versus 264 mm², though this does not translate to performance gains in most tests.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show these key differences between the two processors:

| Specification | Intel Core i7-4710HQ | Intel Core i5-4570S |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 47 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1364 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Codename | Crystalwell | Haswell |

| Die size | 264 mm² | 177 mm² |

| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2014-03-31 | 2013-06-01 |

| Part number | SR1PX | SR14J |

Both processors share the same core count (4), L1 and L2 cache per core (64 KB and 256 KB), L3 cache (6 MB shared), process node (22 nm), transistor count (1,400 million), memory type (DDR3), memory bus (dual-channel), integrated graphics (Intel HD 4600), ECC support (false), and unlocked multiplier (false).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-4710HQ has 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-4570S has 4 threads. Both have 4 physical cores.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Cinebench R23?

A: The i7-4710HQ scores 662 in Cinebench R23 single-core, versus 600 for the i5-4570S, giving the i7-4710HQ a 10.3% advantage.

Q: Which processor wins in Geekbench multicore, and by how much?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570S wins Geekbench multicore with a score of 2945 versus 2694 for the i7-4710HQ, an 8.5% lead.

Q: Do both processors use the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both the i7-4710HQ and the i5-4570S feature the Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The i7-4710HQ has a TDP of 47 W, while the i5-4570S has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Are the sockets compatible with each other?

A: No. The i7-4710HQ uses Intel BGA 1364 (mobile), and the i5-4570S uses Intel Socket 1150 (desktop).

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i7-4710HQ wins in: All Cinebench workloads (R15, R20, R23, both single and multicore). The margins range from 10.0% to 10.3%, making it the clear choice for rendering and multi-threaded productivity. The 8-thread configuration provides a structural advantage in any workload that uses more than 4 threads. Its lower TDP (47 W versus 65 W) also makes it the more efficient option for sustained all-core loads, assuming the platform can manage cooling in a mobile chassis. The average benchmark score of 1473 versus 1426 reinforces this processor's overall lead.

Intel Core i5-4570S wins in: Geekbench multicore and single-core tests. The single-core victory is substantial at 12.6%, and the multicore lead of 8.5% shows that even with fewer threads, the higher base clock (2.90 GHz) and desktop-oriented design deliver better responsiveness in Geekbench-style workloads. For users prioritizing single-threaded application performance as measured by Geekbench, this desktop part is the better option. Its smaller die size (177 mm² versus 264 mm²) may also indicate lower manufacturing complexity, though the database records no direct performance benefit from this.

The split is clean: the i7-4710HQ owns Cinebench across the board, the i5-4570S owns Geekbench across the board. Users should match the processor to the benchmark suite that reflects their actual applications. The i7-4710HQ's 6 head-to-head wins versus the i5-4570S's 2 wins suggest the mobile part is the more balanced performer overall, despite the Geekbench exceptions.