Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 24 cores and 48 threads, while the Intel Core i5-4570 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 boosts up to 3.90 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i5-4570's boost clock of 3.60 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in process node size?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570 uses a 22 nm process, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 uses a 14 nm process.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-4570 does not.

Q: What are the L3 cache sizes for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 35.75 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?

A: The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 scores 24173, which is 81.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-4570's score of 4442.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-4570 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 represent two distinct eras and design philosophies from Intel. The i5-4570 is built on the Haswell architecture using a 22 nm process node, the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses the Cascade Lake-SP architecture on a 14 nm node. The transistor count highlights the scale difference: the i5-4570 packs 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8,000 million transistors, a nearly six-fold increase.

The core and thread configuration fundamentally separates these parts. The i5-4570 offers 4 cores and 4 threads, indicating no Hyper-Threading support, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 provides 24 cores and 48 threads, a 12x increase in core count and a 12x increase in thread count. This makes the Xeon a massively parallel processor designed for server and workstation workloads.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. Both share the same L1 cache size at 64 KB per core, but the L2 cache jumps from 256 KB per core on the i5-4570 to 1 MB per core on the Xeon Platinum 8260. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the i5-4570 has 6 MB shared, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 35.75 MB shared, roughly six times more.

Memory support and platform features further divide the two. The i5-4570 uses DDR3 memory over a dual-channel bus, the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses DDR4. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Xeon, a critical feature for data integrity in server environments. The i5-4570 includes integrated graphics in the form of Intel HD 4600, the Xeon Platinum 8260 has no integrated graphics.

The sockets are incompatible: the i5-4570 fits Intel Socket 1150, the Xeon Platinum 8260 requires Intel Socket 3647. The i5-4570 also supports PCIe Gen 3, while the Xeon's PCIe information is not recorded in the database. The release dates reflect their generational gap: the i5-4570 launched on 2013-06-01, the Xeon Platinum 8260 on 2018-12-10.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete sweep for the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 across all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Xeon scores 24173 against the i5-4570's 4442, a delta of -81.6% from the perspective of the i5. This means the Xeon delivers roughly 5.4 times the multi-core performance, a massive advantage for rendering and heavily threaded workloads.

In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the Xeon Platinum 8260 scores 10152, while the i5-4570 scores 1865, again a delta of -81.6%. The pattern continues in Cinebench R15 multi-core: 2436 for the Xeon versus 447 for the i5, the same -81.6% margin. The consistency of this delta across all three Cinebench multi-core versions indicates a stable performance ratio regardless of the rendering engine's iteration.

Single-core results also favor the Xeon, though the absolute gap is smaller. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Xeon scores 3412, the i5-4570 scores 627, a delta of -81.6%. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1433 versus 263, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 343 versus 63. The Xeon's higher boost clock of 3.90 GHz, compared to 3.60 GHz on the i5, contributes to this single-thread advantage.

It is notable that the i5-4570 has no benchmark wins in this comparison; all six head-to-head tests go to the Xeon Platinum 8260. The i5-4570's average benchmark score of 7421 does exceed the Xeon's average of 6992, but this reflects different benchmark suites, the direct head-to-head tests are unambiguous in the Xeon's favor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-4570 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |

|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 24 |

| Threads | 4 | 48 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.60 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| TDP | 84 W | 165 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | Intel Socket 3647 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Cascade Lake-SP |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Transistors | 1,400 million | 8,000 million |

| Die Size | 177 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 35.75 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | None |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2013-06-01 | 2018-12-10 |

| Part Number | SR14E | SRF9HCD8069504201101 |

The base clock favors the i5-4570 at 3.20 GHz versus 2.40 GHz, but the Xeon's boost clock is higher at 3.90 GHz. The TDP difference is substantial: 84 W for the i5 versus 165 W for the Xeon, reflecting the latter's much larger core count. Both CPUs have locked multipliers, so neither offers unlocked overclocking.

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers a clear verdict: the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 is the superior processor in every measured head-to-head test. Across six Cinebench benchmarks, the Xeon wins all six, with a consistent performance advantage of 81.6% in each comparison. The magnitude of this lead is substantial, not marginal.

For multi-core workloads, the Xeon Platinum 8260 is in a different class. Its 24 cores and 48 threads, combined with 35.75 MB of L3 cache, allow it to crush the i5-4570 in rendering tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24173 versus 4442 demonstrates a roughly 5.4x advantage, which is the kind of gap that transforms workflow times in production environments.

Even in single-core results, the Xeon Platinum 8260 leads. Its 3.90 GHz boost clock outperforms the i5-4570's 3.60 GHz, and the newer Cascade Lake architecture contributes to higher instructions per clock. The single-core deltas of -81.6% mirror the multi-core margins, showing the Xeon does not sacrifice single-thread performance for its core count.

The Intel Core i5-4570 retains relevance only in its lower TDP of 84 W versus 165 W and its integrated graphics, which the Xeon lacks. For a desktop user with legacy DDR3 memory, the i5-4570 offers a complete platform. But for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, the data leaves no room for debate: the Xeon Platinum 8260 is the decisive choice.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 wins in all measured benchmark categories. Its multi-core dominance makes it the clear choice for server virtualization, scientific computing, 3D rendering, video encoding, and any workload that can scale across 48 threads. The 81.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core translates directly to faster batch rendering and shorter simulation times. The 24-core configuration, paired with 35.75 MB of L3 cache, provides ample resources for concurrent virtual machines or heavy data processing.

The Xeon also wins in single-core performance, making it suitable for lightly threaded applications that still benefit from modern architecture. Its 3.90 GHz boost clock ensures responsive performance in database queries, single-threaded scripting, and legacy software that does not utilize multiple cores. The DDR4 memory support and ECC capability further position it for reliability-critical workloads where data corruption is unacceptable.

The Intel Core i5-4570 has no recorded benchmark wins against the Xeon Platinum 8260, but its specification profile suggests specific use cases. Its 84 W TDP makes it suitable for compact desktop builds with limited cooling and power budgets. The integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic office or media consumption scenarios. The dual-channel DDR3 memory support, while older, allows for cost-effective upgrades in existing Haswell platforms.

The i5-4570's lower base clock of 3.20 GHz and 4-core design are adequate for everyday productivity, web browsing, and light multitasking. Its 63rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database indicates it remains a competent performer for its era, but the Xeon Platinum 8260 also sits at the 63rd percentile, showing that the average score metric does not capture the Xeon's specialized strength in threaded workloads.

For users with a Socket 1150 motherboard and DDR3 memory, the i5-4570 provides a drop-in upgrade path from older dual-core processors. But for new system builds targeting server or workstation duties, the Xeon Platinum 8260's 48 threads and 81.6% benchmark advantage in every Cinebench test make it the only rational choice from this comparison. The data shows a generational and architectural gap that no amount of clock speed on the i5-4570 can bridge.