Intel Core i5-3610ME vs Intel Core i7-3537U Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-3610ME

CORE STATE Ivy Bridge
CORE SPECS 2 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 3 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Ivy Bridge
nm
PROCESS 22 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2012
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-3537U

CORE STATE Ivy Bridge
CORE SPECS 2 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2000 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 17W
ARCHITECTURE Ivy Bridge
nm
PROCESS 22 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2013

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
230
201
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
961
839
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
135
118
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
2,289
1,998
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
323
282
geekbench_multicore
N/A
1,269
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
658

Analysis: Intel Core i5-3610ME vs Intel Core i7-3537U

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a one-sided picture in this pairing. Across every recorded test, the Intel Core i5-3610ME holds a consistent advantage over the Intel Core i7-3537U. The head-to-head results show five wins for the i5-3610ME and zero for the i7-3537U, with the margin hovering in a narrow band between 12.6% and 12.7% depending on the workload.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-3610ME scores 230 against the i7-3537U's 201, a delta of 12.6%. That pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the i5-3610ME posts 961 versus 839, again a 12.7% gap. The single-core results tell the same story: Cinebench R20 single-core shows 135 for the i5-3610ME against 118 for the i7-3537U, a 12.6% difference. Cinebench R23 follows with 2289 versus 1998 in multi-core (12.7% delta) and 323 versus 282 in single-core (12.7% delta).

The consistency of these margins is noteworthy. Whether the workload is single-threaded or multi-threaded, the i5-3610ME outperforms the i7-3537U by almost exactly the same proportion. This suggests the advantage is not workload-specific but rather a fundamental throughput difference between the two chips. The i7-3537U's higher marketing tier (Core i7 versus Core i5) does not translate into a performance lead here; the data shows the older, higher-TDP i5 part simply delivers more compute per unit time in every benchmark recorded.

Looking at the broader database context, both processors sit at the 21st percentile among all CPUs, meaning they occupy similar positions in the overall performance distribution. The i7-3537U has an average benchmark score of 766, while the i5-3610ME averages 788. That 22-point difference in average score is modest but consistent with the head-to-head deltas. The i7-3537U's nearest rivals include the AMD A8-6600K (average score 764, delta 0.3%), the Intel Core i3-3240 (761, delta 0.7%), the Intel Core i5-680 (772, delta -0.8%), and the Intel Core i7-3687U (773, delta -0.9%). The i5-3610ME's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-4210U (788, delta 0%), the AMD Opteron 3350 HE (789, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (789, delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (790, delta -0.2%). These neighbor comparisons show both chips clustering with similarly performing parts, though the i5-3610ME sits in a slightly faster company.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental architecture: Ivy Bridge on a 22 nm process node, manufactured by Intel with a die size of 118 mm². Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and both integrate Intel HD 4000 graphics. The core and thread counts are identical at 2 cores and 4 threads. The differences lie in the details of clock speeds, cache allocation, power envelope, and packaging.

The i7-3537U runs a base clock of 2000.00 MHz with a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The i5-3610ME starts higher at 2700 MHz base and boosts to 3.30 GHz. That 700 MHz base clock advantage and 100 MHz boost advantage for the i5-3610ME explains much of the benchmark gap. The i7-3537U compensates with a larger L3 cache: 4 MB shared versus 3 MB shared on the i5-3610ME. Both chips have identical L1 and L2 caches per core at 64 KB and 256 KB respectively, so the L3 difference is the only cache disparity.

The TDP figures separate the two designs sharply. The i7-3537U is rated at 17 watts, a low-power mobile part. The i5-3610ME draws 35 watts, double the power budget. This explains the clock speed differences: the i5-3610ME has more thermal headroom to sustain higher frequencies, while the i7-3537U is constrained by its energy-efficient design. The socket situation reinforces this split: the i7-3537U uses Intel BGA 1023 (soldered), while the i5-3610ME uses Intel Socket G2 (988B), a socketed package.

Memory support also differs. The i7-3537U supports DDR3, while the i5-3610ME has no recorded memory support type in the database. Both feature dual-channel memory buses. Neither chip supports ECC memory. The release dates are about seven months apart: the i5-3610ME launched on May 31, 2012, and the i7-3537U arrived on January 7, 2013. The part numbers also differ (SR0QJ for the i5-3610ME, SR0XG for the i7-3537U), as do their generation labels: Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) versus Core i7 (Ivy Bridge).

Where Each One Wins

The i5-3610ME wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is straightforward: it is the better performer across all tested workloads. In Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both multi-core and single-core tests favor the i5-3610ME by roughly 12.6% to 12.7%. This makes it the stronger choice for CPU-intensive tasks such as rendering, video encoding, or any application that scales with raw processing throughput. The higher base clock and boost clock give it a decisive edge in both lightly threaded and fully threaded scenarios.

The i7-3537U does not win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, but it is not without merits. Its 17 watt TDP is less than half of the i5-3610ME's 35 watts, making it the more power-efficient option for fanless or passively cooled designs, ultra-thin laptops, or any system where heat dissipation and battery life take priority over peak performance. The larger 4 MB L3 cache could also help in workloads with high cache reuse, though the recorded benchmarks do not show any such advantage manifesting. For users who need maximum compute power regardless of power draw, the i5-3610ME is the clear choice. For users who prioritize low power consumption and are willing to accept a roughly 12.7% performance penalty, the i7-3537U fits that niche.

The database's average benchmark scores align with this assessment: the i5-3610ME averages 788 versus 766 for the i7-3537U, a 2.9% difference in average performance that understates the head-to-head gap because the averages include different benchmark suites. The percentile ranking at 21 for both chips indicates they belong to the same performance tier overall, but within that tier the i5-3610ME sits at the upper end.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-3537U | Intel Core i5-3610ME |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2000.00 MHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| TDP | 17 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1023 | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 3 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | Not specified |

| Release Date | 2013-01-07 | 2012-05-31 |

| Part Number | SR0XG | SR0QJ |

| Generation | Core i7 (Ivy Bridge) | Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) |

Both chips share 2 cores, 4 threads, 22 nm process, 118 mm² die size, Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics, dual-channel memory bus, 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, no ECC support, no unlocked multiplier, and mobile market segment designation.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-3610ME wins all multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 2289 against the i7-3537U's 1998, a 12.7% advantage. The same pattern appears in Cinebench R15 (230 vs 201) and R20 (961 vs 839).

Q: Is the Core i7-3537U better because it has a higher model number?

A: No. The benchmark data shows the opposite. Despite being a Core i7, the i7-3537U loses every recorded benchmark to the Core i5-3610ME. The i5-3610ME's higher clock speeds (2.70 GHz base vs 2000.00 MHz) give it a consistent performance edge.

Q: How much power does each processor draw?

A: The i7-3537U has a TDP of 17 watts, while the i5-3610ME is rated at 35 watts. The i7-3537U is designed for lower power consumption, which likely explains its lower clock speeds.

Q: Do both processors have the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both integrate Intel HD 4000 graphics. They also share the same Ivy Bridge architecture and 22 nm process node.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance?

A: The i5-3610ME leads by 12.6% in Cinebench R20 single-core (135 vs 118) and by 12.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core (323 vs 282). The gap is nearly identical to the multi-core margins.

Q: Which CPU has more cache?

A: The i7-3537U has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-3610ME has 3 MB. Both have identical L1 (64 KB per core) and L2 (256 KB per core) caches. Despite having more L3 cache, the i7-3537U still loses all benchmarks.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-3610ME
i7-3537U
Core Specs
Cores
2
2 0.0%
Threads
4
4 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.7
2,000 +73974.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.3
3.2 -3.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.7
2,000 +73974.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.3
3.2 -3.0%
Multiplier
27
20 -25.9%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
3 MB (shared)
4 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
17 -51.4%
Architecture
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Codename
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Generation
Core i5 (Ivy Bridge)
Core i7 (Ivy Bridge)
Process Size
22 nm
22 nm
Die Size
118 mm²
118 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
—
DDR3
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket G2 (988B)
Intel BGA 1023
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Intel HD 4000
Intel HD 4000
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Part Number
SR0QJ
SR0XG
Package
FC-PGA12F
FC-BGA12F
View Core i5-3610ME Details View Core i7-3537U Details