Intel Core i5-14600 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-14600

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 235

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 14 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,070
1,488
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
433
210
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
12,794
6,202
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,806
875
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
30,464
14,769
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
4,300
2,085
geekbench_multicore
14,680
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,424
N/A
passmark_data_compression
434,620
390,711
passmark_data_encryption
25,082
29,293
passmark_extended_instructions
25,674
32,752
passmark_find_prime_numbers
155
371
passmark_floating_point_math
85,759
117,951
passmark_integer_math
117,078
87,948
passmark_multithread
35,848
37,816
passmark_physics
2,330
2,570
passmark_random_string_sorting
48,043
48,980
passmark_single_thread
4,167
4,516
passmark_singlethread
4,167
4,516

Analysis: Intel Core i5-14600 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and Intel Core i5-14600 are both 14-core desktop processors with a 65W TDP, but they come from different generations and architectures. The Ultra 5 235 is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) on a 3nm TSMC process, while the i5-14600 is a Raptor Lake Refresh part on Intel's 10nm node. Benchmark results show a clear split: the i5-14600 dominates Cinebench workloads, while the Ultra 5 235 wins most Passmark sub-tests. Both sit at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, but the Ultra 5 235 has a higher average benchmark score (46062 vs 44889). The data also places the Ultra 5 235 within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13900HX, while the i5-14600 sits 0.5% below the Intel Core i9-12900KS and 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4344P.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic differences appear in Cinebench. The i5-14600 scores 30464 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 51.5% higher than the Ultra 5 235's 14769. The same 51.5% gap appears in Cinebench R15 multicore (3070 vs 1488) and R20 multicore (12794 vs 6202). Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern: the i5-14600 leads by 51.5% in R15 (433 vs 210), 51.6% in R20 (1806 vs 875), and 51.5% in R23 (4300 vs 2085). These are massive margins, indicating that the i5-14600 is far ahead in rendering and CPU-bound tasks that rely on the Cinebench engine.

The Ultra 5 235 fights back in Passmark. Its biggest win is in find prime numbers, where it scores 371 versus 155, a 139.4% advantage. Floating point math also favors the Ultra 5 235 by 37.5% (117951 vs 85759), and extended instructions come in 27.6% higher (32752 vs 25674). Data encryption is 16.8% faster (29293 vs 25082). The Ultra 5 235 also wins the Passmark multithread test by 5.5% (37816 vs 35848) despite having only 14 threads versus 20, and it takes physics by 10.3% (2570 vs 2330). Random string sorting is a narrow 2% win (48980 vs 48043), and single-thread performance is 8.4% higher (4516 vs 4167) in both Passmark single-thread entries.

The i5-14600 still claims two Passmark wins: data compression by 10.1% (434620 vs 390711) and integer math by 24.9% (117078 vs 87948). Overall, the head-to-head table shows 9 wins for the Ultra 5 235 and 8 for the i5-14600, but the Cinebench margins are so large that they dominate the average score comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14600 is the clear choice for Cinebench-style workloads. Its multicore and single-core scores are roughly double those of the Ultra 5 235 across R15, R20, and R23. This points to strong performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and other tasks that use the Cinebench engine. The i5-14600 also wins in integer math and data compression, which are common in database operations, file archiving, and general integer-heavy processing.

The Ultra 5 235 excels in Passmark's floating point and encryption tests. Its 37.5% lead in floating point math suggests better handling of scientific simulations, physics calculations, and financial modeling. The 16.8% encryption advantage makes it a better fit for security-related workloads, VPNs, and disk encryption. The 139.4% lead in prime number finding is a strong indicator for cryptography and number theory applications. The Ultra 5 235 also wins the Passmark multithread test, which is notable because it does so with fewer threads, and it takes the single-thread Passmark test by 8.4%. For users who rely on the Passmark suite as their primary benchmark, the Ultra 5 235 is the better performer.

The Verdict

The data does not declare a single winner. The i5-14600 is the superior processor for Cinebench-based rendering and integer-heavy tasks, with a 51.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and a 24.9% lead in integer math. If your workflow depends on those workloads, the i5-14600 is the obvious pick. The Ultra 5 235, however, wins the majority of Passmark sub-tests, including floating point, encryption, and multithread, and it has a higher average benchmark score (46062 vs 44889). It also matches the i5-14600 in overall percentile (89th) and offers a 5.5% multithread win despite having 6 fewer threads. For users who run a mix of Passmark-style workloads, the Ultra 5 235 is the better all-rounder. Both processors have a 65W TDP and are locked, and their launch MSRPs are $257 for the Ultra 5 235 and $255 for the i5-14600. The choice comes down to which benchmark suite reflects your actual usage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has 14 threads. Both have 14 cores.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i5-14600 boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Ultra 5 235 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The i5-14600 also has a lower base clock at 2.70 GHz versus 3.40 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The i5-14600 supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 5 235 does not.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Ultra 5 235 provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-14600 provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, compared to 44889 for the i5-14600. Both are at the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The i5-14600 wins by a large margin, scoring 30464 versus 14769 for the Ultra 5 235, a 51.5% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Ultra 5 235 uses Arrow Lake (Arrow Lake-S) on a 3nm process from TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The i5-14600 uses Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-R) on Intel's 10nm process, with a 257 mm² die and no transistor count listed. The Ultra 5 235 has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning no hyperthreading, while the i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, using hyperthreading to add 6 extra threads. Cache layouts differ: the Ultra 5 235 has 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core, while the i5-14600 has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. Both share 24 MB of L3 cache. Memory support also diverges: the Ultra 5 235 supports only DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The Ultra 5 235 does not support ECC, but the i5-14600 does. PCIe connectivity is stronger on the Ultra 5 235 with 20 Gen 5 lanes versus 16 on the i5-14600. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Ultra 5 235 has Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 24 execution units, while the i5-14600 has UHD Graphics 770. The Ultra 5 235 uses Socket 1851, while the i5-14600 uses Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Ultra 5 235 has 14 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and a launch MSRP of $257. The i5-14600 has 20 threads, a base clock of 2.70 GHz, a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and a launch MSRP of $255. The Ultra 5 235 uses Socket 1851, while the i5-14600 uses Socket 1700. The architecture is Arrow Lake for the Ultra 5 235 and Raptor Lake for the i5-14600. The process node is 3 nm (TSMC) for the Ultra 5 235 and 10 nm (Intel) for the i5-14600. The Ultra 5 235 has 17,800 million transistors; the i5-14600 has no listed transistor count. Die size is 243 mm² for the Ultra 5 235 and 257 mm² for the i5-14600. L1 cache is 192 KB per core on the Ultra 5 235 versus 80 KB per core on the i5-14600. L2 cache is 3 MB per core versus 2 MB per core. Memory support is DDR5 only for the Ultra 5 235, while the i5-14600 supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Ultra 5 235 has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; the i5-14600 has no recorded bandwidth. ECC support is absent on the Ultra 5 235 and present on the i5-14600. PCIe lanes are 20 Gen 5 on the Ultra 5 235 versus 16 Gen 5 on the i5-14600. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG (24 EU) on the Ultra 5 235 and UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14600. Release dates are January 6, 2025 for the Ultra 5 235 and January 7, 2024 for the i5-14600. Part numbers are SRQAS for the Ultra 5 235 and SRN44 for the i5-14600. Both have 14 cores, a 65W TDP, dual-channel memory bus, 24 MB shared L3, desktop market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-14600
Ultra 5 235
Core Specs
Cores
14
14 0.0%
Threads
20
14 -30.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.7
3.4 +25.9%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2.7
3.4 +25.9%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Multiplier
27
34 +25.9%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
65 W
65 W
PL2
154 W
121 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Arrow Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
17,800 million
Die Size
257 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
2.9 GHz up to 4.4 GHz
P-Core Turbo
4.8 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$255
$257
Part Number
SRN44
SRQAS
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Core i5-14600 Details View Core Ultra 5 235 Details