Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between these two desktop processors, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T dominating every benchmark category where measurements exist. The Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Ultra 9 285T delivers a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This absence of data for the i5 means the comparison relies entirely on the Ultra 9's measured output and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The Ultra 9 285T posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its single-core R23 result of 4739 indicates strong per-thread performance as well. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 14100 with a single-core score of 1990. The older R15 test shows 3384 multi-core and 477 single-core. These results collectively confirm a processor that handles both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks with authority.

PassMark results for the Ultra 9 285T reinforce the Cinebench findings. The multithread score of 39931 and single-thread score of 4576 (listed twice in the database, once as "single_thread" and once as "singlethread") show consistency. Integer math scores 132433, floating point math reaches 137923, and extended instructions (SIMD) hits 27477. Data compression scores 384140, while data encryption manages 32061. Random string sorting produces 47695, find prime numbers scores 345, and physics simulation reaches 2842. The average benchmark score across all tests is 51310.

The nearest rivals to the Ultra 9 285T in the database provide context for its standing. The Intel Core i9-14900T averages 51015, which is 0.6% lower than the Ultra 9's average. The Intel Core i9-13900F averages 51730, putting it 0.8% higher. The Intel Core i7-13850HX averages 50761, 1.1% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT averages 50718, 1.2% lower. This cluster of results shows the Ultra 9 285T sits squarely in the upper tier of desktop processors, trading places with flagship-class parts from the previous generation. The i5-14501TE, with a 50th percentile ranking and zero recorded benchmark scores, cannot be positioned against these numbers directly, but its specification profile suggests it operates in a different performance class entirely.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design generations with fundamentally different internal layouts. The Core i5-14501TE uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and carries the codename Raptor Lake-R. The Core Ultra 9 285T uses Arrow Lake architecture, codenamed Arrow Lake-S, and is built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. This node difference is substantial: the Ultra 9 uses a more advanced manufacturing process with higher transistor density, and the database lists 17,800 million transistors for the Ultra 9, while the i5 has no transistor count recorded.

The core configurations differ sharply. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, meaning it uses Hyper-Threading to double its thread count. The Ultra 9 285T has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no thread-doubling, indicating a hybrid or fully performance-core design where each core handles one thread. The Ultra 9's base clock of 1.40 GHz is lower than the i5's 2.20 GHz, but its boost clock of 5.40 GHz exceeds the i5's 5.10 GHz. Thermal design power tells a similar story: the i5 is rated at 45 W, while the Ultra 9 is rated at 35 W despite having four times the core count. This efficiency advantage comes directly from the 3 nm process.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The i5-14501TE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 9 285T provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 9 also has a larger die at 243 mm² versus the i5's 215 mm². Memory support diverges as well: the i5 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 9 supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Ultra 9 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5 has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ. The i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 9 285T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. PCIe support also differs: the i5 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 9 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Socket compatibility is not shared: the i5 uses Intel Socket 1700, the Ultra 9 uses Intel Socket 1851. The Ultra 9 was released on 2025-01-06, while the i5 was released on 2024-06-30. The Ultra 9 has a launch MSRP of $549.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz. The i5 has a higher base clock at 2.20 GHz versus 1.40 GHz for the Ultra 9.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14501TE and the Ultra 9 285T support ECC memory, according to the database.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The i5-14501TE uses Intel's 10 nm process. The Ultra 9 285T uses TSMC's 3 nm process, with 17,800 million transistors listed in the database.

Q: How does the Ultra 9 285T compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ultra 9 285T averages 51310. The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 0.6% lower, the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 0.8% higher, the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 1.1% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 1.2% lower.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Ultra 9 285T supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501TE | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 80 KB | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1.25 MB | 3 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 24 MB | 36 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $549 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 9 285T wins in every measured benchmark category. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 and single-core score of 4739 demonstrate strength in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark suite confirms this across the board: multithread performance at 39931, single-thread at 4576, integer math at 132433, floating point math at 137923, and extended instructions at 27477. For workloads like data compression (384140), encryption (32061), random string sorting (47695), physics simulation (2842), and prime number finding (345), the Ultra 9 delivers the only recorded data available for this comparison.

The i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmarks, so its wins cannot be quantified from the database. However, its specifications suggest scenarios where it could be the more suitable choice based on platform requirements rather than raw performance. The i5 supports DDR4 memory, which the Ultra 9 does not, so systems reusing existing DDR4 modules would require the i5. The i5 uses Socket 1700, while the Ultra 9 uses Socket 1851, meaning motherboard compatibility dictates which processor fits an existing build. The i5 also has a higher base clock (2.20 GHz versus 1.40 GHz), which could provide more consistent performance in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks that do not sustain boost clocks. The i5's lower core count (6 versus 24) and smaller L3 cache (24 MB versus 36 MB) indicate it targets mainstream workloads rather than heavy multi-threading.

For users building a new system with DDR5 and needing maximum multi-core throughput, the Ultra 9 285T is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For users with an existing Socket 1700 motherboard or DDR4 memory, the i5-14501TE is the only compatible option between these two, despite lacking recorded performance numbers.

The Verdict

The database presents an unambiguous performance hierarchy. The Core Ultra 9 285T sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51310. Its nearest rivals, all within a 1.2% band, are flagship and high-end parts like the Core i9-14900T, Core i9-13900F, Core i7-13850HX, and Ryzen 9 5900XT. The i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded scores, indicating it occupies a mid-range position in the database's overall rankings.

The Ultra 9 285T should be selected for any workload that benefits from high core counts, large caches, or sustained multi-threaded performance. Its 24 cores, 36 MB of L3 cache, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a high-throughput part. The 3 nm process from TSMC delivers this performance at a 35 W TDP, lower than the i5's 45 W rating, which is notable for compact or power-constrained builds. The Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics with 64 execution units also provide a more capable iGPU than the UHD Graphics 770.

The i5-14501TE should be selected for Socket 1700 platforms or for builds that require DDR4 memory support. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, 24 MB of L3 cache, and 5.10 GHz boost clock position it as a mainstream processor. The higher base clock of 2.20 GHz may benefit workloads that run at constant frequency without boosting. With a 45 W TDP, it still fits in power-efficient systems, though it is less efficient than the Ultra 9 on a per-watt basis given the Ultra 9's far higher performance at a lower TDP.

The launch MSRP of $549 for the Ultra 9 285T reflects its position at the top of the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup. No price data exists for the i5-14501TE. The choice between these two processors depends entirely on platform compatibility and performance requirements. The data shows the Ultra 9 285T as the superior performer in every recorded metric, while the i5-14501TE remains a viable option only for specific platform constraints.