Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no overlapping test results for the Intel Core i5-14501TE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. The i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Ultra 9 285H has a full suite of Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark results. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible from the recorded data.

What the data does show is that the Ultra 9 285H is a high-performing mobile processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score reaches 20781.5, and its single-core score hits 2129.5. In Geekbench, it records 14743 for multicore and 2178 for single-core. Passmark results include 34171 for multithread, 4415 for single thread, 109190 for floating point math, and 85922 for integer math. The data compression score is 335859, and the extended instructions score is 26794.

The Ultra 9 285H also demonstrates strong performance in more specialized tests. Random string sorting scores 40931, data encryption scores 26140, and find prime numbers scores 330. Physics processing reaches 2513. These figures establish the Ultra 9 285H as a capable all-around processor, with a percentile ranking of 86 among all CPUs in the database.

The i5-14501TE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores. This does not indicate poor performance, only that no measurements exist in the database. The processor is listed as active and has specifications that suggest it can handle typical desktop workloads, but the lack of data prevents any quantitative assessment.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded data, the Ultra 9 285H wins in every measurable category because it is the only one with benchmark results. Its multicore performance is substantial: Cinebench R23 multicore at 20781.5, Cinebench R20 multicore at 12201, and Cinebench R15 multicore at 3177.5. These scores indicate strong throughput for heavily threaded applications such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and compilation tasks.

Single-core performance is equally solid. The Ultra 9 285H scores 2129.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1722 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 313 in Cinebench R15 single-core. Geekbench single-core at 2178 and Passmark single thread at 4415 confirm that it handles lightly threaded workloads like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software efficiently.

The i5-14501TE has no wins in any benchmark category because no scores are recorded. Its specifications, including 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, suggest it can handle everyday desktop tasks. However, without measured results, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage. The Ultra 9 285H, with 16 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and a 86th percentile ranking, is the clear leader in all documented comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use distinct designs. The i5-14501TE is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-H, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. This process difference is significant: the 3 nm node represents a more advanced manufacturing technology compared to 10 nm.

Core counts differ substantially. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 9 285H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The i5-14501TE uses hyper-threading to double its thread count, while the Ultra 9 285H does not, giving it one thread per core. Cache hierarchies also differ. The i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 9 285H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and also 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 9 285H has more cache per core in L1 and L2.

The die size of the i5-14501TE is 215 mm², while the Ultra 9 285H has no recorded die size. Memory support also differs. The i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Ultra 9 285H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ: the i5-14501TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 9 285H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics are different as well. The i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 9 285H uses Arc Graphics 140T. The market segments differ: the i5-14501TE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 9 285H is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2049. Both have locked multipliers and are currently active in production. The i5-14501TE was released in June 2024, while the Ultra 9 285H was released in January 2025. The Ultra 9 285H has a launch MSRP of $651.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H for any user who needs measured performance. Its benchmark results place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 38312. The nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core 9 270H with an average score of 38335 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Xeon w3-2525 with 38392 and a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX with 38261 and a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 with a delta of 0.2%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Ultra 9 285H sits in a tight cluster of high-performance processors.

For desktop users considering the i5-14501TE, the data offers no benchmark evidence of its capabilities. The processor has 6 cores, 12 threads, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which are solid specifications on paper. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm node, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. These features suggest it can handle typical desktop workloads, but the absence of recorded scores means the database cannot verify its performance level.

The Ultra 9 285H is the better choice for anyone who prioritizes verified, high-end performance. Its 16 cores, 16 threads, and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, combined with a 3 nm process node and TSMC fabrication, deliver strong results across all tested benchmarks. Its mobile market segment means it is designed for laptops, but its performance profile is competitive with desktop processors in the same database percentile range. The i5-14501TE remains a viable desktop option for users who need a Raptor Lake processor with ECC memory support and DDR4 compatibility, but the data does not support any performance claims for it.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ultra 9 285H has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Ultra 9 285H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for both processors?

A: Both the i5-14501TE and the Ultra 9 285H have 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The L1 and L2 cache sizes differ, with the Ultra 9 285H having 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core, while the i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Ultra 9 285H ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14501TE ranks in the 50th percentile. The Ultra 9 285H also has an average benchmark score of 38312, while the i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Ultra 9 285H uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501TE | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake-H |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake-H) |

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Graphics 140T |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2049 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | June 2024 | January 2025 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $651 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| Production Status | Active | Active |