Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 266V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two processors is asymmetrical. The Intel Core i5-14501TE carries no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V has a full suite of results. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible, but the available measurements for the Ultra 7 266V can still be interpreted against its own position in the database.

The Core Ultra 7 266V posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16544 and a single-core score of 2335. In Cinebench R20, it scores 6948 multi-core and 980 single-core. The older R15 test shows 1667 multi-core and 235 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that scales reasonably well across synthetic rendering workloads, with the multi-core scores roughly seven times the single-core figures, a typical ratio for a hybrid architecture with multiple efficiency cores.

In PassMark tests, the Ultra 7 266V shows particular strength in data compression with a score of 187050, and in floating-point math with 56923. Integer math scores 41558, while extended instructions reach 15928. Data encryption hits 13822, and random string sorting lands at 22905. The multithread score is 19461, and the single-thread score is 3943. Physics simulation scores 1608, and the prime number search test yields 191.

The average benchmark score for the Ultra 7 266V is 23297, which places it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H at 23277 (a delta of 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i9-11900F at 23254 (0.2 percent), the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V at 23219 (0.3 percent), and the AMD EPYC 4124P at 23167 (0.6 percent). The margin between the Ultra 7 266V and its closest competitor is extremely narrow, only 20 points, which is less than one tenth of one percent. This suggests that in aggregate performance, the Ultra 7 266V sits at the top of a very tightly clustered group.

Because the i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmarks, the database shows zero wins for either processor in a head-to-head sense. The analysis must therefore rely on architectural and specification differences to infer likely performance outcomes, rather than direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the i5-14501TE. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The Core Ultra 7 266V, by contrast, has 17 recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 76th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 266V compare to its nearest rival in aggregate score?

A: The Ultra 7 266V has an average benchmark score of 23297. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, scores 23277, which is a delta of 0.1 percent. The next rival, the Intel Core i9-11900F, scores 23254, a 0.2 percent delta. The Ultra 7 266V leads both, but only by a razor-thin margin.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 7 266V has a TDP of 17 watts. This means the Ultra 7 266V is rated for substantially lower power consumption, which aligns with its mobile market segment.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core Ultra 7 266V has 8 cores and 8 threads. The i5 offers more threads due to Hyper-Threading, while the Ultra 7 has more physical cores but no thread doubling.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Core Ultra 7 266V does not. This is a meaningful difference for workstation or server-oriented use cases.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core Ultra 7 266V uses Arc 140V. Both are integrated solutions, but they belong to different GPU families.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear split based on available data. The Core Ultra 7 266V is fully characterized with benchmark results, a 76th percentile ranking, and a strong aggregate score of 23297. It belongs to the mobile segment, has a 17 watt TDP, and uses 8 cores with 8 threads. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.6 percent of its score, which indicates that it is competitive with a range of desktop and mobile processors from both AMD and Intel.

The Core i5-14501TE is a desktop processor with a 45 watt TDP, 6 cores and 12 threads, and support for ECC memory. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its performance cannot be quantified here. Its 50th percentile ranking is a neutral placeholder, not a measured result.

For users who require a mobile processor with verified performance data, the Core Ultra 7 266V is the only choice with recorded measurements. For users who need a desktop processor with ECC memory support and a higher thread count, the Core i5-14501TE offers those specifications, but without benchmark confirmation of its speed. The data does not support a direct performance verdict between the two, only a specification-based distinction.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field.

The Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 266V has 8 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are identical at 2.20 GHz for both. Boost clocks differ slightly: the i5-14501TE reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Ultra 7 266V reaches 5.00 GHz. TDP differs significantly, with the i5 at 45 watts and the Ultra 7 at 17 watts.

The socket types are incompatible. The i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 266V uses Intel BGA 2833. The i5 is a desktop part, while the Ultra 7 is a mobile part. The process nodes differ: the i5 uses a 10 nm node from Intel, while the Ultra 7 uses a 3 nm node from TSMC.

Cache configurations diverge. The i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 266V has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The die size for the i5 is 215 mm², while the Ultra 7 has no listed die size.

Memory support differs. The i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 266V supports LPDDR5X, with the note that it depends on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory. The Ultra 7 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the i5 has no bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the i5 but not on the Ultra 7.

PCIe lanes differ. The i5-14501TE supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ultra 7 266V supports Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 770 on the i5 versus Arc 140V on the Ultra 7.

Release dates are close but not identical. The i5-14501TE launched on 2024-06-30, while the Ultra 7 266V launched on 2024-09-23. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The Core i5-14501TE belongs to the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The architecture uses 6 cores with 12 threads, relying on a traditional P-core design with Hyper-Threading. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The die size is 215 mm².

The Core Ultra 7 266V belongs to the Lunar Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The architecture uses 8 cores with 8 threads, which suggests a hybrid arrangement without Hyper-Threading. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. No die size is recorded.

The process node difference is substantial: 10 nm versus 3 nm. This is a generational jump in manufacturing technology, with the Lunar Lake part being fabricated at a smaller node from a different foundry. The smaller node typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power draw, which is consistent with the 17 watt TDP of the Ultra 7 compared to the 45 watt TDP of the i5.

The cache architecture also reflects a different design philosophy. The Ultra 7 has much larger per-core L1 and L2 caches (192 KB and 2.5 MB per core, respectively) but half the shared L3 (12 MB versus 24 MB). The i5 has smaller per-core caches but a larger shared pool. This suggests that the Lunar Lake design relies more on local cache locality, while the Raptor Lake design benefits from a larger shared cache for multi-core workloads.

The memory architecture differs as well. The i5 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, indicating a flexible platform that can accommodate older or newer memory. The Ultra 7 supports LPDDR5X, which is a low-power memory standard typically used in mobile devices. The Ultra 7 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the i5 has no such figure.

The PCIe configuration is notably different. The i5 provides 16 Gen 5 lanes, which is a full desktop complement. The Ultra 7 provides only 4 Gen 5 lanes, reflecting its mobile nature where expansion is more limited. The integrated graphics also differ: UHD Graphics 770 on the i5 versus Arc 140V on the Ultra 7.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 266V wins in any scenario where verified benchmark performance matters. Its recorded scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark provide a concrete basis for comparison. It sits at the 76th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.6 percent of its score, indicating that it is a competitive part in aggregate performance. Its 17 watt TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained mobile environments. The 8 cores provide a higher physical core count, and the larger per-core caches (192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2) may benefit workloads that exhibit high locality. The Arc 140V integrated graphics and LPDDR5X memory support with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth are additional advantages for mobile use.

The Core i5-14501TE wins on specifications that favor desktop and workstation scenarios. It has 12 threads versus 8, which can aid in heavily threaded workloads that scale with thread count. It supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Ultra 7, which is critical for data integrity in server or professional applications. It offers 16 Gen 5 PCIe lanes, providing more expansion capability for discrete GPUs or other add-in cards. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is double that of the Ultra 7, which could benefit certain multi-core workloads that rely on shared data. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is slightly higher than the 5.00 GHz on the Ultra 7, offering a marginal single-thread clock advantage. The i5 also supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving platform memory flexibility.

The data does not indicate a clear overall winner because one processor lacks benchmark results. The Ultra 7 266V has a measured aggregate score of 23297 and a 76th percentile rank, which is a strong showing. The i5-14501TE has no measured scores, so its performance cannot be compared directly. The choice between them depends on whether the user prioritizes verified mobile performance (Ultra 7 266V) or desktop-specific features like ECC memory, more threads, and greater PCIe expansion (i5-14501TE).