Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains benchmark results only for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries in the database. Consequently, the Core Ultra 7 265KF holds a clear advantage in every measured category. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ultra 7 265KF scores 5013 points, a figure that reflects its 20-core configuration. Its single-core score in the same test is 707 points. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score reaches 20889, while the single-core result is 2948 points. The Cinebench R23 test shows a multicore score of 49736 and a single-core score of 7021. Geekbench results for the Ultra 7 265KF show a multicore score of 22913 and a single-core score of 2759.

PassMark tests further illustrate the Ultra 7 265KF's capabilities. The multithread score is 58518, and the single-thread score is 4928. In specialized workloads, the data shows a floating point math score of 189431, an integer math score of 143351, and an extended instructions score of 54513. Data compression scores 666589, while data encryption scores 48198. Random string sorting reaches 79735, and find prime numbers scores 486. The physics test yields a score of 3633. With no benchmark scores recorded for the i5-14501TE, the database cannot compute a comparative delta between the two processors. However, the absence of results for the i5-14501TE means the Ultra 7 265KF stands as the only measured performer in this comparison.

The Ultra 7 265KF holds a 94th percentile rank among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 71910. Its nearest rivals provide context for this performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX averages 71797, a delta of 0.2 percent relative to the Ultra 7 265KF. The Intel Xeon 6517P averages 72350, which is 0.6 percent lower than the Ultra 7 265KF. The Intel Xeon 6724P averages 72396, 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 averages 71370, 0.8 percent higher. These close margins indicate that the Ultra 7 265KF sits in a competitive performance band among high-end desktop and server processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark score of the Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it holds a 50th percentile rank among all CPUs, though this rank is not supported by any measured results.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 7 265KF averages 71910 across all benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX is 0.2 percent ahead, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 0.8 percent ahead, and the Intel Xeon 6517P and Intel Xeon 6724P trail by 0.6 percent and 0.7 percent respectively.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF does not support ECC memory.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Intel Core i5-14501TE belongs to the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is part of the Core 14th Gen series with a Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation label. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF belongs to the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S codename, and is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 with an Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake) generation label. These are distinct design lineages within Intel's product stack.

The core configurations differ substantially. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads. This means the Ultra 7 265KF uses a design where each core corresponds to a single thread, whereas the i5-14501TE uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count. The cache hierarchy also diverges. The i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 265KF has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches and total L3 capacity on the Ultra 7 265KF align with its higher core count and newer architecture.

The process node and foundry differ as well. The i5-14501TE is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel foundries, with a die size of 215 mm². The Ultra 7 265KF is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm². The Ultra 7 265KF also has a transistor count of 17,800 million, while the i5-14501TE does not have a recorded transistor count. The socket types differ: the i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Ultra 7 265KF uses Intel Socket 1851. These socket differences indicate platform-level incompatibility, meaning the two processors cannot be used interchangeably on the same motherboard.

The Ultra 7 265KF has a multiplier unlocked for overclocking, while the i5-14501TE does not. The Ultra 7 265KF also provides more PCIe lanes, with Gen 5 support across 20 lanes (CPU only), compared to Gen 5 across 16 lanes (CPU only) for the i5-14501TE. The Ultra 7 265KF has a memory bandwidth rating of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14501TE does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure. The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra 7 265KF supports DDR5 only. Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus.

Specification Differences

The base clock differs: the i5-14501TE runs at 2.20 GHz, while the Ultra 7 265KF runs at 3.90 GHz. The boost clock also differs, with the i5-14501TE reaching 5.10 GHz and the Ultra 7 265KF reaching 5.50 GHz. Thermal design power differentiates the two significantly: the i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Ultra 7 265KF has a TDP of 125 watts. This reflects the higher core count and clock speeds of the Ultra 7 265KF.

The memory support differs as detailed above: the i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 265KF supports DDR5 only. The i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 7 265KF does not. The integrated graphics differ: the i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 7 265KF has none. The multiplier unlock status differs, with the Ultra 7 265KF being unlocked and the i5-14501TE locked. The process node and foundry differ, as do the socket types. The PCIe lane count differs, with the Ultra 7 265KF offering 20 lanes versus 16 lanes on the i5-14501TE. The release dates differ: the i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30, and the Ultra 7 265KF was released on 2024-10-23. The Ultra 7 265KF has a launch MSRP of $379, while the i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is the measured performer in this comparison. Its benchmark results, ranging from a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49736 to a PassMark multithread score of 58518, place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot substantiate any performance claims for it. For users prioritizing measured multi-threaded and single-threaded throughput, the Ultra 7 265KF is the only option with supporting data.

The i5-14501TE offers features that the Ultra 7 265KF lacks. It supports ECC memory, which is relevant for error-sensitive workloads. It includes integrated graphics through UHD Graphics 770, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic display configurations. It also supports DDR4 memory, which may be relevant for users with existing DDR4 platforms on Socket 1700. Its 45 watt TDP indicates a lower power envelope compared to the Ultra 7 265KF's 125 watt TDP. The i5-14501TE's 6 cores and 12 threads, along with 24 MB of shared L3 cache, provide a modest configuration for lighter workloads.

The Ultra 7 265KF delivers more cores, higher clocks, larger caches, and a newer 3 nm process node from TSMC. It holds a 94th percentile rank, and its nearest rivals in the database are within a 0.8 percent delta, confirming its competitive standing. It is unlocked for overclocking, offers 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and supports DDR5 with a rated memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Its lack of integrated graphics and ECC support narrows its suitability to builds with discrete GPUs and non-ECC memory.

The data supports a clear split. The Ultra 7 265KF is for workloads that demand high core counts and top-tier benchmark performance. The i5-14501TE is for configurations that need ECC memory, integrated graphics, or lower power consumption. The choice depends on which of these factors matters more, as the benchmark database provides no measured results for the i5-14501TE to compare against the Ultra 7 265KF's extensive score set.