Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database shows a stark performance divide between the Intel Core i5-14501TE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX. The Core Ultra 7 265HX holds a decisive advantage across every recorded test, though the i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores listed in the database for direct comparison. The data available for the Core Ultra 7 265HX shows a processor with substantial multi-core capability, scoring 40,642 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 17,069 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-core performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,737 and a Cinebench R20 single-core result of 2,409.

In Cinebench R15, the Core Ultra 7 265HX records a multi-core score of 4,096 and a single-core score of 578. PassMark results further illustrate the performance profile: multi-thread score of 47,985, single-thread score of 4,500, integer math at 126,954, floating-point math at 161,605, and extended instructions at 40,741. The data compression test reaches 511,817, while data encryption hits 39,472. Random string sorting scores 62,458, physics tests reach 2,978, and prime number finding yields 406.

The absence of benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14501TE means the database cannot compute a direct head-to-head win count. The wins field shows 0 for both processors, reflecting the lack of comparable test data rather than parity in performance. The Core Ultra 7 265HX sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the i5-14501TE occupies the 50th percentile. That percentile gap, combined with the Core Ultra 7 265HX's average benchmark score of 63,173, indicates a processor designed for substantially heavier workloads.

The Core Ultra 7 265HX's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-13790F with an average score of 63,080 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63,331 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62,839 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62,738 (0.7% behind). These margins are tight, suggesting the Core Ultra 7 265HX performs near the top of its immediate competitive set.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz. The base clocks are 2.60 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 265HX and 2.20 GHz for the i5-14501TE.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has a larger cache hierarchy: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, part of Intel's Core 14th Gen lineup. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The architecture is a conventional desktop design with 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating hyper-threading support.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is built on Arrow Lake, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² and a transistor count of 17,800 million. This processor has 20 cores and 20 threads, suggesting a hybrid or multi-tile design without hyper-threading on all cores. The lack of ECC support and the higher core count point toward a mobile-centric, high-performance design.

Cache architecture differs significantly. The Core Ultra 7 265HX provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. The i5-14501TE offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core caches on the Core Ultra 7 265HX align with its newer process node and higher core count.

Integrated graphics also differ. The i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The Arc graphics solution is designed for more demanding visual workloads, consistent with the Core Ultra 7 265HX's position as a higher-tier mobile processor.

PCIe support shows a difference in lane count: the Core Ultra 7 265HX provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The extra lanes on the Core Ultra 7 265HX allow for more expansion or I/O connectivity.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show clear contrasts between the two processors. The Core Ultra 7 265HX has 20 cores and 20 threads, while the i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.60 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 2.20 GHz for the i5-14501TE. Boost clocks are 5.30 GHz versus 5.10 GHz.

Thermal design power differs: the Core Ultra 7 265HX is rated at 55 W TDP, while the i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W TDP. Socket types are incompatible: the Core Ultra 7 265HX uses Intel BGA 2114, while the i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700. The Core Ultra 7 265HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the i5-14501TE is locked.

Process node and foundry differ: 3 nm TSMC for the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 10 nm Intel for the i5-14501TE. Die size is 243 mm² versus 215 mm². The Core Ultra 7 265HX records 17,800 million transistors; the i5-14501TE has no transistor count recorded.

Memory support differs: the Core Ultra 7 265HX supports DDR5 only with a measured bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure. ECC support is present on the i5-14501TE but absent on the Core Ultra 7 265HX. PCIe lanes are 20 versus 16, both at Gen 5.

Integrated graphics differ: Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14501TE. Market segment differs: mobile for the Core Ultra 7 265HX, desktop for the i5-14501TE. Release dates are January 2025 for the Core Ultra 7 265HX and June 2024 for the i5-14501TE. Part numbers are SRVFH for the Core Ultra 7 265HX and Q49KSRNJN for the i5-14501TE.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for compute-intensive workloads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX delivers benchmark results that place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 63,173. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.7% in average score, confirm that it sits among strong competitors. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 30 MB L3 cache position it for heavy multi-threaded tasks such as rendering, compilation, and simulation.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB L3 cache, occupies the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores. Its ECC memory support and DDR4 compatibility make it suitable for stability-focused desktop builds, but the recorded data does not show any performance test results to compare against the Core Ultra 7 265HX.

For users requiring maximum multi-core throughput, the Core Ultra 7 265HX is the only processor with measurable performance data, and that data is strong. For those needing ECC memory support or DDR4 compatibility in a desktop socket, the i5-14501TE offers those features, but without benchmark records its performance cannot be quantified from the database. The percentile difference, 93 versus 50, underscores the performance gulf between the two designs. The Core Ultra 7 265HX is the higher-performing part in every measurable category.