Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark measurements for the Intel Core i5-14501TE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL. Both processors are listed as Active production parts, with the Core i5-14501TE released on 2024-06-30 and the Core Ultra 7 155UL released earlier on 2024-04-07. The absence of comparative scores means no numerical wins can be attributed to either part in direct testing. However, the specification data provides a basis for evaluating their relative positions.

The Core i5-14501TE operates with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL presents a substantially different configuration with 12 cores and 14 threads. The thread count difference of only 2 threads despite a doubling of cores indicates that the Core Ultra 7 155UL likely employs efficiency cores that do not add threads in the same manner as the performance cores. This structural difference influences any potential multi-threaded workload performance, though the database lacks measured scores to confirm the magnitude.

Clock speeds separate the two clearly. The Core i5-14501TE has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, giving it a 3.10 GHz boost range. The Core Ultra 7 155UL runs at a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, a 3.10 GHz boost range as well. The Core i5-14501TE holds the advantage in both base and boost frequencies, with a 0.50 GHz higher base and a 0.30 GHz higher boost. For single-threaded performance, which relies heavily on peak frequency, the data suggests the Core i5-14501TE should lead, although no benchmark score confirms this.

Thermal design power differs by a factor of three. The Core i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL is rated at 15 W TDP. This 30 W gap indicates the Core Ultra 7 155UL is designed for significantly lower power envelopes, which can affect sustained performance in thermally constrained systems. The Core i5-14501TE with its higher TDP can draw more power to maintain higher clocks under load, but the exact performance consequences are not quantified in the database.

Both processors share the 50th percentile versus all CPUs according to the recorded percentile field, placing them at the median of the entire CPU population in the database. This equal percentile ranking suggests that, in the absence of direct measurements, the aggregate position of both parts is identical across all recorded CPUs.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark results, the wins must be inferred from architectural and specification differences. The Core i5-14501TE shows advantages in frequency-sensitive workloads. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the Core Ultra 7 155UL's 4.80 GHz boost, which directly benefits tasks that depend on single-thread speed such as lightly threaded applications, legacy software, and workloads with serial dependencies. The 2.20 GHz base clock also provides a higher floor for sustained operation when boost is not active.

The Core Ultra 7 155UL counters with a core-count advantage. Its 12 cores versus 6 cores gives it a theoretical edge in parallel workloads that scale with core count, such as rendering, compilation, and data processing. The 14 threads versus 12 threads adds a modest thread-level advantage, though the disparity between core count and thread count indicates that not all 12 cores contribute equally to threading. The 12 MB shared L3 cache is smaller than the Core i5-14501TE's 24 MB shared L3 cache, which may reduce its effectiveness in cache-sensitive workloads despite the higher core count.

The Core Ultra 7 155UL delivers its performance at 15 W TDP, which is 30 W lower than the Core i5-14501TE's 45 W TDP. This makes the Core Ultra 7 155UL the better fit for power-limited systems where heat dissipation and energy consumption are primary constraints. The Core i5-14501TE, with its higher TDP, suits systems that can supply and cool a more power-hungry part but may benefit from the higher clock speeds.

Memory bandwidth favors the Core Ultra 7 155UL, which records a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core i5-14501TE does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database, so no direct comparison can be made. The Core Ultra 7 155UL supports DDR5 memory dependent on the motherboard, while the Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the latter broader memory compatibility. ECC memory is supported on the Core i5-14501TE but not on the Core Ultra 7 155UL, a relevant factor for reliability-focused systems.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages within Intel. The Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The Core Ultra 7 155UL uses the Meteor Lake architecture, specifically Meteor Lake-PS, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1. It is built on a 7 nm process node, and its die size is not recorded.

The process node difference of 7 nm versus 10 nm indicates the Core Ultra 7 155UL uses a more advanced manufacturing process, which typically enables higher transistor density and improved power efficiency. The Core Ultra 7 155UL's 15 W TDP compared to the Core i5-14501TE's 45 W TDP is consistent with this process advantage, though the exact efficiency gains are not measured in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ in both capacity and organization. The Core i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 155UL has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 155UL provides more per-core cache at the L1 and L2 levels, which can benefit individual core performance. The Core i5-14501TE provides twice the shared L3 cache, which can benefit workloads that share data across cores.

The core counts reflect different design philosophies. The Core i5-14501TE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating a uniform core design with hyper-threading on all cores. The Core Ultra 7 155UL uses 12 cores and 14 threads, which is consistent with a hybrid architecture containing performance cores and efficiency cores, where only the performance cores contribute additional threads. The database does not specify the exact core type distribution, but the thread count implies this hybrid structure.

Socket compatibility separates the two parts completely. The Core i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL uses Intel Socket 1851. These sockets are not interchangeable, meaning platform selection dictates which processor can be used. PCIe support also differs: the Core i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The Core i5-14501TE offers both a newer PCIe generation and twice the lane count.

Integrated graphics differentiate the two. The Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL uses Arc Xe-LPG 64EU. The database does not provide benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so their relative graphics performance cannot be quantified. The memory support also differs: the Core i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 155UL supports DDR5 dependent on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

The Core Ultra 7 155UL has a recorded launch MSRP of $426. The Core i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core Ultra 7 155UL was released earlier on 2024-04-07, while the Core i5-14501TE followed on 2024-06-30. Both parts are locked, as neither has an unlocked multiplier. Neither processor has any recorded benchmarks or nearest rivals in the database, and both hold the same 50th percentile position versus all CPUs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is 0.30 GHz higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL's boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL has 12 cores and 14 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core Ultra 7 155UL has double the core count but only 2 additional threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two parts?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W TDP, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL is rated at 15 W TDP, a difference of 30 W.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL has a launch MSRP of $426. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data provides no direct benchmark results for either processor, so the verdict rests entirely on specification analysis. The Intel Core i5-14501TE should be selected for workloads that prioritize single-thread speed and higher clock frequencies. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded figure among the two, and its 24 MB shared L3 cache provides a larger shared pool for data reuse across cores. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with ECC memory support, makes it suitable for systems requiring flexible memory configurations and data integrity features. Its Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes offers greater expansion bandwidth and lane count for add-in devices.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL should be selected for power-constrained environments where the 15 W TDP is a critical constraint. The 30 W lower TDP compared to the Core i5-14501TE makes it the preferred option for thermally limited chassis, low-power builds, or systems where energy consumption is a priority. Its 12 cores provide a structural advantage for parallel workloads, though the 14-thread count suggests only a limited threading gain over the Core i5-14501TE's 12 threads. The 7 nm process node indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, which aligns with its lower power profile. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure that the Core i5-14501TE cannot match, as no bandwidth figure is recorded for that part.

Neither processor shows a definitive overall winner in the database because no head-to-head scores exist. The equal 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs places both at the median of the recorded CPU population. The choice between them is determined by platform requirements: Socket 1700 for the Core i5-14501TE and Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 7 155UL. The Core i5-14501TE targets higher-performance desktop use with its higher clocks, larger L3 cache, ECC support, and broader memory compatibility. The Core Ultra 7 155UL targets efficiency-focused desktop use with its 15 W TDP, higher core count, and newer process node. The data supports selecting based on these distinct design goals rather than on measured performance, which remains unrecorded for both parts.