Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

The Intel Core i5-14501TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen desktop lineup, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 mobile lineup. The database shows a clear split in performance characteristics, with the Ultra 5 228V holding a 75th percentile ranking across all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 21440, while the i5-14501TE holds a 50th percentile ranking with no recorded benchmark scores. The Ultra 5 228V is placed near the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, which scores 21484, a difference of 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i9-11900H, which scores 21367, a difference of 0.3 percent. The recorded data for the i5-14501TE includes no benchmark entries, so the analysis relies on the specification differences and the measured results of the Ultra 5 228V.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database contains no entries for either processor, meaning direct side-by-side measurements are not available. The only recorded scores belong to the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, and these can be interpreted against its nearest rivals. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ultra 5 228V scores 1502.5 points. In Cinebench R15 singlecore, it scores 267 points. The Cinebench R20 multicore result is 6491 points, and the singlecore result is 916 points. Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 9932 points, while singlecore delivers 1758 points. PassMark results include data compression at 173924, data encryption at 13032, extended instructions at 14801, find prime numbers at 168, floating point math at 53310, integer math at 39679, multithread at 18227, physics at 1538, random string sorting at 21254, and single thread at 3836.

The nearest rival data provides context for these scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, with an average score of 21484, is 0.2 percent ahead of the Ultra 5 228V. The Intel Core i9-11900H, with an average score of 21367, is 0.3 percent behind. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.9 percent ahead, and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which is 1 percent behind. The Ultra 5 228V sits nearly at parity with these four processors, with a spread of only 1.9 percent between the highest and lowest rivals. This narrow margin places the Ultra 5 228V in a competitive position for its performance class, though it does not dominate any of its closest competitors.

For the i5-14501TE, the absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm any wins or losses. The winsA and winsB fields show zero for both processors, which aligns with the empty head-to-head array. The measured data confirms that the Ultra 5 228V has a substantial performance footprint, but the i5-14501TE remains unquantified in this database.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is the only one of the two with recorded performance metrics, and it performs within a narrow band around its nearest rivals. The database places it at the 75th percentile, meaning it outperforms three quarters of all CPUs in the database. The i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile, but without benchmark scores, the percentile ranking alone does not convey a measured performance advantage. The Ultra 5 228V has a lower TDP of 17 watts compared to 45 watts for the i5-14501TE, which suggests efficiency advantages, but the i5-14501TE has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.50 GHz for the Ultra 5 228V.

The i5-14501TE offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores and 8 threads. The i5-14501TE has a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 MB. The Ultra 5 228V has a smaller process node of 3 nm from TSMC, while the i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm node from Intel. The i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 5 228V does not. The i5-14501TE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 228V is a mobile part on Intel BGA 2833.

The verdict from the data is that the Ultra 5 228V is the better measured performer, given its 75th percentile and substantial benchmark scores. The i5-14501TE cannot be ranked on measured performance because no scores exist in the database. The i5-14501TE does offer more threads, more L3 cache, ECC support, and a higher boost clock, which may appeal to specific workloads, but the recorded data does not verify those advantages. Users who rely on measured results should consider the Ultra 5 228V, while those who need ECC memory or a desktop socket may look to the i5-14501TE based on its specifications.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 21440 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has an average score of 21484, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ultra 5 228V.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the i5-14501TE has an empty benchmarks array and no recorded scores.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The i5-14501TE ranks at the 50th percentile, while the Ultra 5 228V ranks at the 75th percentile.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The i5-14501TE has 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts, and the Ultra 5 228V has a TDP of 17 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores and 8 threads. The base clock for the i5-14501TE is 2.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.10 GHz. The Ultra 5 228V has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The TDP for the i5-14501TE is 45 watts, and for the Ultra 5 228V it is 17 watts. The i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 228V uses Intel BGA 2833.

The cache configurations differ as well. The i5-14501TE has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 24 MB shared. The Ultra 5 228V has an L1 cache of 192 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 8 MB shared. The i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra 5 228V has memory support listed as unknown and dependent on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 5 228V does not.

The PCIe configurations differ. The i5-14501TE has Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 5 228V has Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics differ: the i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, and the Ultra 5 228V uses Arc 130V. The market segments differ, with the i5-14501TE being a desktop processor and the Ultra 5 228V being a mobile processor. The release dates differ, with the i5-14501TE released on June 30, 2024, and the Ultra 5 228V released on September 23, 2024. Both have locked multipliers. The part numbers are Q49KSRNJN for the i5-14501TE and SRPMVSRPMU for the Ultra 5 228V.

Architecture Differences

The architecture differences are substantial. The i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake architecture with the same codename, part of the Ultra 5 Lunar Lake generation. The i5-14501TE is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, while the Ultra 5 228V uses a 3 nm process at TSMC. The die size for the i5-14501TE is 215 mm², while the die size for the Ultra 5 228V is not recorded.

The core counts and thread counts reflect different design philosophies. The i5-14501TE uses 6 cores with hyperthreading to reach 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 228V uses 8 cores without hyperthreading, giving 8 threads. The L1 and L2 caches per core are larger on the Ultra 5 228V, at 192 KB and 2.5 MB respectively, compared to 80 KB and 1.25 MB on the i5-14501TE. However, the shared L3 cache is much larger on the i5-14501TE, at 24 MB versus 8 MB.

The memory support differs. The i5-14501TE explicitly supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra 5 228V has memory support that depends on the motherboard and is listed as unknown. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501TE but not on the Ultra 5 228V. The PCIe lanes from the CPU also differ, with 16 lanes on the i5-14501TE and 4 lanes on the Ultra 5 228V, both at Gen 5. The integrated graphics are different, with UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14501TE and Arc 130V on the Ultra 5 228V. The market segments are desktop versus mobile, which affects the socket types and overall design constraints.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V wins in measured performance categories. It has a 75th percentile ranking, an average benchmark score of 21440, and specific scores such as 9932 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1758 in Cinebench R23 singlecore. It also has a much lower TDP of 17 watts, which suggests efficiency in power-constrained scenarios. The Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores, which may benefit parallel workloads that scale with core count rather than thread count.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in specification categories. It has 12 threads, which can help with heavily threaded workloads that benefit from hyperthreading. It has a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB, which can improve data locality for certain applications. It supports ECC memory, which is important for error-sensitive computing. It has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which may provide faster single-thread performance in theory, though no measured data confirms this. It uses a desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering memory flexibility that the Ultra 5 228V does not explicitly provide.

The database shows no head-to-head wins for either processor, so the use-case split relies on the available measurements and specifications. The Ultra 5 228V is the clear winner in measured performance, with a comprehensive set of benchmark results. The i5-14501TE is the winner in thread count, cache capacity, ECC support, and boost clock. The Ultra 5 228V also wins on process node, using 3 nm from TSMC, and on per-core cache sizes. The i5-14501TE wins on PCIe lane count, with 16 lanes versus 4 lanes, and on release date being earlier by roughly three months. The data does not support a broader narrative, as the i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores to confirm its specification advantages in practice.