Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Comparison
Intel Core i5-14501TE
Core Ultra 5 225F
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Intel Core i5-14501TE and Intel Core Ultra 5 225F represent two distinct approaches to desktop processing within Intel’s recent lineup. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the Core Ultra 5 225F holding a substantial lead in every recorded benchmark. However, the Core i5-14501TE offers specific platform advantages that remain relevant for certain use cases. This analysis breaks down the recorded measurements, architectural differences, and platform implications based on database records.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark database contains a complete set of measurements for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F, while no recorded scores are available for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. This absence of data for the i5-14501TE means a direct numerical comparison cannot be constructed from the database. The analysis below focuses on the Core Ultra 5 225F’s recorded performance and its standing against its nearest rivals.
In Cinebench R15, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 2660 points in the multicore test and 287 points in the single-core test. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result climbs to 11059 points, while the single-core score reaches 1561 points. The Cinebench R23 results continue this trend, with a multicore score of 16467 points and a single-core score of 1893 points. These figures indicate a processor that scales well across rendering workloads, with the single-core scores showing strong per-thread performance relative to its core count.
PassMark results paint a fuller picture of the Core Ultra 5 225F’s capabilities. The data compression test records a score of 310843, which indicates fast handling of compressed data streams. Data encryption scores 22648, while extended instructions (SIMD-heavy workloads) reach 28027. The prime number finding test scores 352, a result that reflects integer-heavy sequential processing. Floating point math scores 92554, integer math scores 66417, and the multithread test records 31004. Physics processing scores 2430, random string sorting scores 37325, and the single-thread test scores 4397.
The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 5 225F is 37313, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context for this score. The Intel Core i9-13900HK records an average score of 37425, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 5 225F. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161, a 0.4% deficit relative to the Core Ultra 5 225F. The Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37135, also 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, representing a 0.5% gap. These narrow margins indicate that the Core Ultra 5 225F sits in a highly competitive performance tier, effectively matching a previous-generation mobile flagship (i9-13900HK) while slightly edging out several desktop and mobile parts.
Where Each One Wins
Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F wins decisively in every benchmark category where measurements exist. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, deliver strong multi-threaded performance as shown in the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16467 points. The single-thread score of 4397 in PassMark reflects its high boost frequency and modern architecture. The processor’s 85th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.
The Intel Core i5-14501TE, lacking benchmark scores in the database, cannot be positioned numerically against the Core Ultra 5 225F. However, its platform characteristics suggest distinct advantages. The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 225F supports only DDR5. For users with existing DDR4 memory, the i5-14501TE allows retention of that hardware. The i5-14501TE also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core Ultra 5 225F. This makes the i5-14501TE viable for error-sensitive workloads such as file servers or computational tasks where data integrity is critical.
The integrated graphics on the i5-14501TE (UHD Graphics 770) provide a display output without a discrete GPU, whereas the Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics. Systems built around the i5-14501TE can operate headless or with basic display functionality using only the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 225F requires a separate graphics card for any video output. The i5-14501TE’s 45 W TDP also positions it as a lower-power option compared to the Core Ultra 5 225F’s 65 W TDP, which matters for compact or thermally constrained builds.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F’s boost clock of 4.90 GHz.
Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads.
Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?
A: Yes, both support DDR5. However, the Intel Core i5-14501TE also supports DDR4, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F supports only DDR5.
Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F?
A: The recorded memory bandwidth for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is 102.4 GB/s. No memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel Core i5-14501TE.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F does not support ECC memory.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F uses 10 cores and 10 threads. The i5-14501TE has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 W, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has a TDP of 65 W.
The socket differs: the i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Intel Socket 1851. The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 225F supports only DDR5. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14501TE and absent on the Core Ultra 5 225F. The PCIe configuration also differs: the i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 225F provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).
Integrated graphics are present on the i5-14501TE as UHD Graphics 770, whereas the Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics. The release dates show the i5-14501TE launched on 2024-06-30, and the Core Ultra 5 225F launched on 2025-01-06. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a recorded launch MSRP of $231, while the i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP.
Architecture Differences
The architectural split between these two processors is significant. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s own foundry. The die size is 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, belonging to the Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. The transistor count is 17,800 million, and the die size is 243 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.
The process node difference (10 nm versus 3 nm) explains the Core Ultra 5 225F’s higher transistor count despite its larger die size, as the denser 3 nm process allows more transistors per area. The larger L1 and L2 caches per core on the Core Ultra 5 225F provide more dedicated fast storage for each core, while the i5-14501TE offers a larger shared L3 cache (24 MB versus 20 MB). The Core Ultra 5 225F’s lack of integrated graphics and ECC support, combined with its newer socket and memory support limited to DDR5, indicates a design focused on raw compute performance rather than platform flexibility. The i5-14501TE, with its older process node, integrated graphics, ECC support, and dual memory standards, targets a broader range of system configurations including those requiring display output or error correction.