Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14501TE and the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL represent two distinct approaches to desktop processing within Intel’s current lineup. The data shows a clear split: the i5-14501TE is built for high-frequency, single-thread responsiveness, while the Ultra 3 105UL prioritizes multi-threaded throughput and energy efficiency. Benchmark results confirm that the Ultra 3 105UL delivers a superior overall average score, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the i5-14501TE’s 50th percentile. However, the i5-14501TE holds a significant advantage in raw clock speed, which translates into wins in specific workloads that favor rapid per-core execution.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL has an average benchmark score of 13061, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has an average benchmark score of 0. The database shows no recorded benchmark scores for the i5-14501TE.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL has 8 cores and 10 threads. The Ultra 3 has more physical cores, but the i5 has more total threads due to its hyper-threading implementation.

Q: What are the maximum boost clocks for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE boosts up to 5.10 GHz, which is substantially higher than the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL’s boost clock of 4.20 GHz. This difference directly impacts single-thread performance.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL does not. This makes the i5-14501TE more suitable for error-correcting workloads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL is $295. No launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel Core i5-14501TE.

Q: How does the process node compare between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL uses a smaller 7 nm process node. The smaller node typically indicates a more modern manufacturing process.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is fundamental. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, which is part of the Core 14th Gen series. This is a refinement of Intel’s hybrid design philosophy, using higher clock speeds to drive performance. The chip is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, with a die size of 215 mm². Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large L3 allocation helps feed the high boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL is based on the Meteor Lake architecture, specifically Meteor Lake-PS, belonging to the Core Ultra Series 1. This is a newer design, built on a 7 nm process, also by Intel. The cache layout is different: it has 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, but only 10 MB of shared L3 cache. Despite the smaller L3, the per-core L2 is larger, which can benefit certain localized data patterns. The Ultra 3 also uses a different socket, Intel Socket 1851, compared to the i5-14501TE’s Intel Socket 1700, meaning they are not interchangeable on motherboards.

The memory support also diverges. The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving it flexibility with older or newer platforms. The Ultra 3 supports DDR5, with the exact specification depending on the motherboard. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the Ultra 3 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14501TE does not have a bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory is another differentiator: the i5-14501TE supports it, while the Ultra 3 does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The i5-14501TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a high-bandwidth interface for modern GPUs and storage. The Ultra 3 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which is a step down in both generation and lane count. Integrated graphics also differ: the i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 3 includes Arc Xe-LPG 48EU, which is a newer GPU architecture.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data, which exists only for the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL, shows a clear pattern of wins for that chip in multi-threaded and mixed workloads. The i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins must be inferred from its specifications, particularly its 5.10 GHz boost clock versus the Ultra 3’s 4.20 GHz. In any workload that is heavily dependent on single-core frequency, the i5-14501TE is positioned to win. This includes tasks like basic application responsiveness, some legacy software, and light, non-parallelized scripting.

The Ultra 3 105UL wins in almost every measured category. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 8742, which is a strong result for an 8-core, 10-thread chip. Its single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 1234, which is lower than what the i5-14501TE’s 5.10 GHz clock would likely produce, but the database lacks a direct comparison. The Ultra 3 also dominates in PassMark tests: it scores 41171 in integer math, 30750 in floating point math, and 10285 in multithreaded performance. These numbers indicate that the Ultra 3 is the better choice for content creation, compilation, and any task that can spread work across its 8 cores.

The i5-14501TE, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, has fewer physical cores but a higher thread count than the Ultra 3’s 10 threads. Still, the Ultra 3’s 8 physical cores give it a raw throughput advantage in most parallel workloads. The i5-14501TE’s wins would come in single-threaded scenarios where boost clock matters most, such as in certain gaming engines or lightly-threaded productivity apps, but no benchmark scores are available to quantify this.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows several key differences. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL has 8 cores and 10 threads. Base clocks are 2.20 GHz for the i5-14501TE and 1.50 GHz for the Ultra 3. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz and 4.20 GHz, respectively. The TDP is a major divider: the i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W, while the Ultra 3 is rated at 15 W, indicating the Ultra 3 is designed for much lower power draw.

The sockets differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the i5-14501TE and Intel Socket 1851 for the Ultra 3. The process nodes are 10 nm and 7 nm, respectively. Cache sizes are distinct: L1 is 80 KB per core for the i5-14501TE versus 112 KB per core for the Ultra 3; L2 is 1.25 MB per core versus 2 MB per core; L3 is 24 MB shared versus 10 MB shared. Memory support sees the i5-14501TE offer DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 3 only lists DDR5. The i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, the Ultra 3 does not. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the i5-14501TE, and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Ultra 3. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 versus Arc Xe-LPG 48EU. The i5-14501TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the Ultra 3 has no listed die size. The Ultra 3 has a launch MSRP of $295, and the i5-14501TE has none listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores in the database, a direct head-to-head comparison is only possible through the Ultra 3’s results and its nearest rivals. The Ultra 3 105UL’s average benchmark score is 13061. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-9400F with an average score of 13041, putting the Ultra 3 ahead by 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-10750H scores 13024, which is 0.3% behind the Ultra 3. The Intel Core i5-8500 scores 13142, which is 0.6% ahead of the Ultra 3, and the Intel Core i7-7700K scores 13291, which is 1.7% ahead.

Focusing on the Ultra 3’s own scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 8742 is its most impressive multi-threaded showing. In comparison, its single-core score of 1234 is much lower, indicating that the chip’s design favors sustained multi-core loads over bursty single-core performance. The PassMark multithread score of 10285 reinforces this, as does the integer math score of 41171. The data compression score of 93961 is also high, suggesting strong performance in archiving or data-heavy tasks.

The i5-14501TE’s advantage lies in its 5.10 GHz boost clock. This is a 21% higher boost clock than the Ultra 3’s 4.20 GHz, which would likely yield a significant win in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Ultra 3 scores only 124. However, without recorded scores for the i5-14501TE, the database cannot quantify this. The i5-14501TE also has a higher base clock of 2.20 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, which may help in sustained lightly-threaded workloads.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL for overall performance. Its average benchmark score of 13061 places it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, and it holds its own against the Intel Core i5-9400F, i7-10750H, i5-8500, and i7-7700K, all within a 1.7% margin. The Ultra 3 delivers strong multi-core results, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8742 and a PassMark multithread score of 10285. Its 8 physical cores provide a solid foundation for parallel tasks, and its 15 W TDP indicates high efficiency for a desktop chip.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE is a different beast. With a 45 W TDP, it draws three times the power of the Ultra 3, but it offers a much higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This makes it the logical choice for tasks that are bound by single-thread speed, such as certain legacy applications or lightly-threaded workloads where clock frequency is king. Its support for ECC memory and DDR4 gives it an edge in compatibility and reliability-focused builds, and its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes is a forward-looking feature for high-bandwidth peripherals.

However, the absence of any benchmark scores for the i5-14501TE in the database means its performance claims cannot be verified. The Ultra 3, by contrast, has a full suite of results showing a balanced, capable processor. For a user prioritizing multi-threaded performance, energy efficiency, and a proven benchmark profile, the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL is the clear pick based on the data. For a user who needs maximum single-core frequency, ECC memory support, and a more traditional socket with DDR4 compatibility, the Intel Core i5-14501TE offers those specific features, though its performance in measured workloads remains undocumented. The data indicates that the Ultra 3 is the more complete processor for general and multi-threaded use, while the i5-14501TE is a specialized alternative for frequency-sensitive and reliability-oriented scenarios.