Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core i9-14900HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows only one side of this comparison has benchmark results. The Intel Core i9-14900HX carries a full suite of measured scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This asymmetry means a direct head-to-head walkthrough of individual test scores is impossible from the available facts. What can be analyzed is where the i9-14900HX stands relative to the broader CPU landscape, and what the i5-14501TE’s specifications suggest about its expected positioning.

For the i9-14900HX, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 places it in a strong high-end tier. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 2181.5 indicates that its per-thread performance is also competitive, though not exceptional. The Geekbench multicore score of 17511 and single-core score of 2330 follow a similar pattern: excellent parallel throughput, solid but not dominant single-thread behavior. The Passmark suite reinforces this: multithread score of 43778, integer math at 157375, floating point math at 112273, and extended instructions at 31247. These numbers collectively describe a processor that excels when many threads are active.

The i5-14501TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, would logically fall far behind in any multicore-heavy benchmark. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus the i9-14900HX’s 36 MB, and its lower core count, suggest a substantial gap in parallel workloads. The i9-14900HX’s 24 cores and 32 threads are nearly four times the thread count of the i5-14501TE, so any multicore score comparison would show a massive delta. The database does not provide a head-to-head benchmark array for these two, so exact deltas cannot be cited. However, the i9-14900HX’s percentile rank of 91 versus the i5-14501TE’s 50 percentile tells the story: the i9 sits in the top decile of all CPUs, while the i5 is exactly at the midpoint.

The nearest rivals for the i9-14900HX provide context. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919 on average, a mere 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 56273, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 scores 56306, also 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555, 1% higher. These are extremely tight margins, indicating the i9-14900HX is squarely in a competitive cluster where small percentage differences separate top-tier performers. The i5-14501TE has no nearest rivals listed, so no such comparison exists for it.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture, but they are distinct variants. The i5-14501TE is classified as Raptor Lake-R, while the i9-14900HX is Raptor Lake-HX. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The die sizes differ: the i5-14501TE measures 215 mm², while the i9-14900HX is larger at 257 mm². The core counts are the most obvious divergence: 6 cores and 12 threads for the i5, versus 24 cores and 32 threads for the i9. The i9-14900HX is multiplier unlocked, allowing overclocking, while the i5-14501TE is locked.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14501TE, but 2 MB per core for the i9-14900HX. The shared L3 cache is 24 MB on the i5 and 36 MB on the i9. This means the i9 has 50% more L3 cache and 60% more L2 per core. The larger die size of the i9 likely accommodates the extra cores and cache.

Socket and form factor separate them further. The i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, while the i9-14900HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket. The market segments reflect this: the i5 is listed as Desktop, the i9 as Mobile. Despite the mobile designation, the i9-14900HX has a TDP of 55 watts, higher than the i5’s 45 watts. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. Both have PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and both integrate UHD Graphics 770.

The release dates differ: the i9-14900HX launched on 2024-01-07, while the i5-14501TE launched on 2024-06-30. Both are marked as Active in production status. The part numbers are Q49KSRNJN for the i5 and SRMXF for the i9. The generation labels are slightly different: the i5 is "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)" and the i9 is "Core i9 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh)." Both are from the Core 14th Gen series.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900HX wins in every scenario that benefits from parallel processing. Its 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with 36 MB of L3 cache, make it the clear choice for workloads that scale across many threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 and Passmark multithread score of 43778 confirm this strength. Content creation, 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing tasks that can utilize all available threads would see a major advantage on the i9. Its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs reinforces its position as a high-end part.

The i5-14501TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, would win in scenarios where lower power consumption and desktop socket compatibility matter more than raw thread count. Its 45 watt TDP is lower than the i9’s 55 watts, and it uses the standard LGA 1700 desktop socket, which allows for easier system integration in traditional desktop builds. For single-threaded tasks, the i5’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz is close to the i9’s 5.80 GHz, so the gap in lightly threaded workloads would be smaller than in heavily threaded ones. The i5’s 24 MB of L3 cache is still substantial, and its 50th percentile ranking indicates it is a mainstream performer, not a weak one.

The i9-14900HX’s unlocked multiplier is another advantage, as it allows overclocking to push performance further, though the exact gains are not quantified in the data. The i5’s locked multiplier means it runs at stock settings only. In mobile environments where the i9-14900HX is designed to be used, the 55 watt TDP is a trade-off: higher performance but also higher power draw and heat output. The i5’s 45 watt TDP is more modest, but it is a desktop part, so thermal management is typically less constrained.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the i9-14900HX has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. Both have the same base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14501TE and 2 MB per core for the i9-14900HX. The shared L3 cache is 24 MB for the i5 and 36 MB for the i9.

Q: Are both processors on the same socket?

A: No. The i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the i9-14900HX uses Intel BGA 1964.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14501TE and the i9-14900HX support ECC memory.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The i5-14501TE is at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, while the i9-14900HX is at the 91st percentile.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the i9-14900HX is the overwhelmingly stronger performer in multicore workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055, Geekbench multicore score of 17511, and Passmark multithread score of 43778 place it in the top tier of processors, with a 91st percentile ranking. It also has a higher boost clock (5.80 GHz vs 5.10 GHz), more cache (36 MB L3 vs 24 MB L3), and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The i9 clearly targets users who need maximum parallel throughput and are willing to accept a 55 watt TDP in a mobile form factor.

The i5-14501TE, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is a mainstream desktop processor. Its 45 watt TDP and Socket 1700 compatibility make it suitable for standard desktop builds where power efficiency and platform simplicity are priorities. Its 24 MB L3 cache and 5.10 GHz boost clock mean it is not a weak part, but it cannot compete with the i9 in any heavily threaded scenario. The 50th percentile ranking confirms it sits in the middle of the performance distribution.

Users with workloads that scale across many threads should choose the i9-14900HX. Users who need a desktop processor with moderate power draw and do not require extreme multicore performance would find the i5-14501TE adequate. The data does not support any scenario where the i5 outperforms the i9, given the i9’s benchmark scores and the i5’s lack of any recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501TE | Intel Core i9-14900HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 watts | 55 watts |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-01-07 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | Q49KSRNJN | SRMXF |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 91 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 56004 |

The shared specifications include the same base clock of 2.20 GHz, 10 nm process node, Intel as foundry, 80 KB L1 per core, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, and the Core 14th Gen series designation.