Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501TE and Intel Core i7-14700F are both desktop processors from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. The i5-14501TE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the i7-14700F offers 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The i7-14700F carries a 65 W TDP compared to the i5-14501TE’s 45 W TDP, and the i7-14700F has a launch MSRP of $359. The i5-14501TE includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, whereas the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics. Both processors use Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both are fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, with the i5-14501TE having a die size of 215 mm² and the i7-14700F a die size of 257 mm². The benchmark database contains no recorded scores for the i5-14501TE, while the i7-14700F has a full set of measurements across multiple test suites.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core i5-14501TE and the Intel Core i7-14700F. The i5-14501TE has an average benchmark score of zero, with no individual test scores recorded, while the i7-14700F holds an average benchmark score of 53620. This absence of data for the i5-14501TE means a direct comparison of measured performance is impossible. The i7-14700F’s recorded results stand alone, and any analysis of the i5-14501TE must rely on its architectural specifications rather than observed outcomes.

The i7-14700F’s benchmark scores are substantial across multi-core workloads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 3540, and in Cinebench R20 multi-core, it reaches 14751. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result is 35122, indicating strong scaling across its 20 cores and 28 threads. Geekbench multi-core shows 19620, while PassMark multi-thread reports 41317. These figures position the i7-14700F as a high-throughput processor for parallel tasks.

Single-core performance for the i7-14700F is also notable. Cinebench R15 single-core scores 499, Cinebench R20 single-core scores 2082, and Cinebench R23 single-core scores 4958. Geekbench single-core records 2429, and PassMark single-thread shows 4257. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz likely contributes to these results, though the database does not provide clock-specific correlations.

The i5-14501TE, with no benchmark scores, cannot be measured against these numbers. Its 6 cores and 12 threads suggest a lower multi-core ceiling, while its 5.10 GHz boost clock implies competitive single-core potential, but the database offers no empirical confirmation. The percentile ranking for the i5-14501TE is 50, placing it at the median of all CPUs in the database, whereas the i7-14700F sits at the 91st percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded processors.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14700F demonstrates clear advantages in multi-core workloads based on its recorded scores. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache provide the structural foundation for high parallel performance. PassMark integer math scores 155808, floating point math scores 107005, and extended instructions score 28564. Data compression in PassMark reaches 505885, while data encryption scores 30144. Prime number finding scores 176, random string sorting scores 55918, and physics scores 2455. These results confirm the i7-14700F excels in compute-heavy, multi-threaded applications such as rendering, scientific simulation, and data processing.

The i7-14700F also wins on single-thread performance, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958. PassMark single-thread at 4257 and Geekbench single-core at 2429 reinforce this capability. The larger 2 MB per-core L2 cache on the i7-14700F, compared to the i5-14501TE’s 1.25 MB per-core L2, may contribute to higher per-core efficiency, though the database does not isolate cache effects.

The i5-14501TE lacks recorded benchmark data, so its wins cannot be quantified. Its integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a functional advantage for systems without a discrete GPU, a feature the i7-14700F entirely lacks. The i5-14501TE’s lower 45 W TDP suggests reduced power consumption, potentially beneficial for compact or power-constrained builds, but the database provides no power measurements. The i5-14501TE’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for basic productivity, but its lack of scores prevents any performance-based win.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, 0.6% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, 0.8% lower. The i7-14700F sits slightly below the Xeon 6505P but above the other three rivals.

Q: What is the single-core performance of the i7-14700F?

A: The i7-14700F scores 4958 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2082 in Cinebench R20 single-core, 499 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2429 in Geekbench single-core, and 4257 in PassMark single-thread. These results reflect its 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: Does the i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the i5-14501TE. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile vs all CPUs is 50, meaning it falls at the median. No individual test results are available for analysis.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). Systems using the i7-14700F require a discrete graphics card for display output.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: Both the i5-14501TE and the i7-14700F support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Both also support ECC memory, a feature listed as true for each processor.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two processors?

A: The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The i7-14700F also has a larger shared L3 cache of 33 MB compared to the i5-14501TE’s 24 MB.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count: the i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks are close, with the i5-14501TE at 2.20 GHz and the i7-14700F at 2.10 GHz, but boost clocks differ, with the i5-14501TE reaching 5.10 GHz and the i7-14700F reaching 5.40 GHz. TDP ratings also diverge: the i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W, the i7-14700F at 65 W.

Cache configurations are distinct. The i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-14700F has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. Die sizes differ as well, with the i5-14501TE at 215 mm² and the i7-14700F at 257 mm².

Integrated graphics separate the two: the i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics. Release dates differ, with the i5-14501TE released on 2024-06-30 and the i7-14700F on 2024-01-07. The i7-14700F has a launch MSRP of $359, while the i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP. Part numbers also differ, with the i5-14501TE listed as Q49KSRNJN and the i7-14700F as SRN3Z.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. The core microarchitecture is shared, but the physical layouts differ. The i7-14700F’s larger die size of 257 mm² accommodates more cores and cache, while the i5-14501TE’s 215 mm² die reflects its smaller configuration.

Cache hierarchy differences are notable. The i5-14501TE allocates 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, while the i7-14700F allocates 2 MB per core. Shared L3 cache jumps from 24 MB on the i5-14501TE to 33 MB on the i7-14700F. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

The i5-14501TE integrates UHD Graphics 770, a graphics unit absent on the i7-14700F. Both processors support ECC memory, dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported through the multiplier. The i7-14700F’s higher TDP of 65 W, compared to the i5-14501TE’s 45 W, indicates a higher power envelope for sustained performance, though the database provides no thermal or power draw measurements.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i7-14700F for performance. It holds a 91st percentile ranking across all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620, while the i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile with a score of zero due to missing measurements. The i7-14700F’s 20 cores, 28 threads, 33 MB L3 cache, and 5.40 GHz boost clock deliver recorded multi-core scores like 35122 in Cinebench R23 and 19620 in Geekbench multi-core, along with single-core results reaching 4958 in Cinebench R23. These numbers place it ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6% and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8% in average score, while trailing the Intel Xeon 6505P by only 0.2%.

The i5-14501TE offers no measured performance data, so its suitability rests on specifications alone. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, suggest moderate single-thread capability, but the lack of scores prevents any confirmation. Its integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display output option that the i7-14700F lacks, making it a plausible choice for systems without discrete graphics. The lower 45 W TDP also implies reduced power demand, though no power figures exist in the database to quantify this.

For users prioritizing raw performance, the i7-14700F is the only processor with evidence of capability. Its benchmark results confirm strength in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads alike. The i5-14501TE, absent from the benchmark record, cannot be recommended on performance grounds. The i7-14700F’s launch MSRP of $359 provides a reference point, but the i5-14501TE has no comparable figure. The verdict, based strictly on recorded data, is that the i7-14700F is the superior processor for any measurable workload, while the i5-14501TE remains an unverified alternative with integrated graphics as its sole distinguishing feature.