AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and the Intel Core i5-14501TE are two very different processors aimed at different market segments. The data shows the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a mobile processor with an extensive benchmark record, while the Core i5-14501TE is a desktop chip that currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This analysis relies strictly on the available data for the AMD part and the architectural and specification differences between the two.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results are not recorded in the database for these two processors. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries, so a side-by-side comparison of measured scores is impossible. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has a comprehensive set of benchmark results, and its performance can be contextualized against its nearest rivals in the database.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20254 and a single-core score of 2859. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8506 multi-core and 1200 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2041 multi-core and 288 single-core. These scores indicate a strong performer for a mobile processor.

In PassMark tests, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 23850 in multithread, 3641 in single-thread, 88339 in integer math, 50746 in floating-point math, 272664 in data compression, and 16441 in data encryption. The extended instructions score is 19132, and the find prime numbers score is 76. Physics tests show a score of 1174, and random string sorting hits 33109.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 32233. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 83, placing it well above the median. The nearest rivals in the database provide a useful reference. The Intel Core i9-11900 has an average score of 32226, which is a delta of 0% from the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. The Intel Core i5-14400F scores 32279, a delta of -0.1% meaning the Ryzen part is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a delta of 0.3% in favor of the AMD chip. The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, a delta of 0.4%. These figures show that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U's overall average performance sits in a tight band with several desktop and mobile Intel parts, within a range of less than half a percent in either direction.

The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U delivers performance comparable to a previous-generation Intel Core i9 desktop processor and current Core i5 desktop parts, despite being a mobile chip with a 28 watt TDP. The absence of any benchmark data for the Core i5-14501TE means its performance cannot be quantified in this comparison.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, by contrast, has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U?

A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is 32233. This places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900, has an average score of 32226, showing a 0% delta.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compare to the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has an average score of 32115, which is a delta of 0.4% from the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. This means the AMD mobile processor scores slightly higher in average benchmark performance.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part has more cores and threads available for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD process node is smaller, which typically allows for higher density and efficiency.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point. It is part of the 8000 series and the Ryzen 7 generation. The process node is 4 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This architecture is designed for mobile computing, as indicated by its market segment.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R. It is part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 generation. The process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The die size is 215 mm². The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This architecture is designed for desktop computing, as indicated by its market segment.

A key architectural difference is the process node. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process. The AMD chip has a smaller die at 178 mm² compared to Intel's 215 mm². The cache structures differ, with the AMD part having smaller per-core L1 and L2 caches but a more compact design, while the Intel part has larger per-core caches and a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB versus 16 MB.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The PCIe capabilities differ as well, with the AMD part supporting Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part supporting Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock of the AMD part is 3.30 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 2.20 GHz. Both have the same boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

The TDP differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part is a mobile processor with a socket of AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with an Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The AMD part has 25,000 million transistors, while the transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded. The die size is 178 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. The cache configurations differ, with the AMD part having 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, while the Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

The integrated graphics are Radeon 780M for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Both support ECC memory. The market segment is mobile for AMD and desktop for Intel. The release dates differ, with the AMD part released on 2024-04-15 and the Intel part released on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, and both are locked multipliers.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear divide between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has a substantial body of benchmark results, with an average score of 32233 and a percentile of 83. It performs on par with or slightly ahead of several Intel desktop parts in the database, including the Intel Core i9-11900, Core i5-14400F, Core i7-12800H, and Core i5-14400. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900, shows a 0% delta, meaning the AMD mobile chip matches a previous-generation desktop i9 in average performance.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark data recorded. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile is 50. Without recorded scores, the database cannot confirm its performance level. The Intel part does offer a higher TDP of 45 watts versus 28 watts, which in a desktop context could suggest a different power envelope, but no performance numbers exist to validate any advantage.

For users choosing between these two, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the only one with measurable data. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide more parallel processing capability than the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part also has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.20 GHz, though both boost to 5.10 GHz. The smaller 4 nm process node and lower TDP suggest a more power-efficient design, which aligns with its mobile market segment.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with no benchmarks, cannot be recommended based on performance data. Its larger L3 cache of 24 MB versus 16 MB and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory are notable specifications, but they do not translate into measurable performance in the database. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes is a differentiating feature, but again, the lack of benchmark data leaves its real-world impact unknown.

The verdict from the data is that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a proven performer with a strong benchmark record. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is an unmeasured part in the database, and any performance claims would be speculative. The AMD part is the safer choice based on recorded evidence.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U wins in every category where data exists. It has a higher core count at 8 versus 6, and a higher thread count at 16 versus 12. Its base clock is higher at 3.30 GHz versus 2.20 GHz, and both share the same boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD part has a lower TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts, making it more power-efficient. It uses a smaller 4 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm, and it has a smaller die size of 178 mm² versus 215 mm².

In benchmark performance, the AMD part's average score of 32233 places it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11900, Core i5-14400F, Core i7-12800H, and Core i5-14400, and it either matches or beats each of these within a delta of 0.4%. This confirms that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U delivers competitive multi-core and single-core performance for a mobile chip.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in cache capacity. It has 80 KB of L1 per core versus 64 KB, 1.25 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB, and 24 MB of shared L3 versus 16 MB. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part also has PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

For memory bandwidth, the AMD part has a recorded 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded value. The Intel part has a die size of 215 mm², which is larger, and it uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The Intel part is a desktop processor with an Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD part is mobile with an AMD Socket FP7.

In use cases, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is suited for mobile computing, given its market segment and lower TDP. Its benchmark scores indicate strong performance for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and general productivity, as shown by its Cinebench and PassMark results. The Intel Core i5-14501TE, as a desktop part, may be intended for embedded or low-power desktop systems, but without benchmark data, its specific strengths cannot be quantified. The data only allows for a clear win for the AMD part in measured performance.