Intel Core i5-14500T vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor delivers the higher multi-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 48,945 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 11,790. The Ultra 9 285 leads by 75.9% in this test.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-threaded PassMark performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 records a PassMark single-thread score of 4,881, while the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 3,736. The Ultra 9 285 is 23.5% ahead in this metric.

Q: What is the difference in thermal design power between these processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a TDP of 65 watts. The i5-14500T is designed for lower power consumption.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-14500T and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488, compared to 28,065 for the Intel Core i5-14500T. The Ultra 9 285 sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14500T is in the 80th percentile.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions on these two chips?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 wins every single benchmark in the comparison database, taking all 17 head-to-head tests. Its average benchmark score of 75,488 dwarfs the 28,065 average of the Intel Core i5-14500T, a gap of roughly 2.7 times. The Ultra 9 285 also commands a higher percentile ranking, sitting at 95 versus 80 for the i5-14500T.

The i5-14500T is not without purpose. Its 35-watt TDP makes it a low-power desktop option, and the 14 cores, 20 threads configuration provides adequate multi-threaded throughput for mainstream workloads. The recorded scores show it handles Cinebench R23 multi-core at 11,790 and PassMark multi-thread at 22,910, which are respectable figures for a chip in this thermal class.

The Ultra 9 285, however, belongs to a different performance tier entirely. Its 24 cores, 24 threads, 3 nm process node from TSMC, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache combine to deliver scores that are simply in another league. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 48,945 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602 demonstrate substantial compute capability for demanding desktop workloads.

The choice depends on the target use case. The i5-14500T fits systems where power efficiency is the priority, given its 35-watt TDP and lower launch MSRP of $232. The Ultra 9 285, with its launch MSRP of $579, is the pick for users who need maximum throughput and can accommodate the 65-watt TDP. The benchmark data shows no scenario where the i5-14500T outperforms the Ultra 9 285, so the decision rests entirely on power and cost constraints versus raw performance requirements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 dominates the Intel Core i5-14500T across every recorded workload, but the margins vary considerably by test type. The largest single gap appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Ultra 9 285 scores 459 versus 81 for the i5-14500T, a 82.4% advantage. This indicates a major difference in integer-heavy mathematical throughput.

Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the next biggest separation at 75.9%. The Ultra 9 285 records 48,945, while the i5-14500T manages 11,790. The single-core variant of the same test shows a 73.4% lead for the Ultra 9 285, with scores of 6,909 versus 1,838. These Cinebench results point to both superior multi-threaded scaling and higher per-core efficiency in the newer architecture.

PassMark floating point math reveals a 69.8% advantage for the Ultra 9 285, scoring 194,988 against 58,869 for the i5-14500T. Data encryption also shows a wide gap, with the Ultra 9 285 at 46,949 and the i5-14500T at 15,410, a 67.2% difference. Extended instructions testing gives the Ultra 9 285 a 64.6% lead, scoring 45,357 versus 16,043.

Physics simulation in PassMark favors the Ultra 9 285 by 64.2%, with scores of 3,598 and 1,288 respectively. Random string sorting shows a 61.4% margin, with the Ultra 9 285 at 73,651 and the i5-14500T at 28,462. Cinebench R15 multi-core and R20 multi-core both produce roughly 59% to 60.2% leads for the Ultra 9 285, scoring 4,933 versus 2,022 and 20,556 versus 8,177 respectively.

PassMark multi-thread delivers a 59.5% advantage for the Ultra 9 285, at 56,602 versus 22,910. Data compression shows a 56.4% gap, with the Ultra 9 285 at 602,121 and the i5-14500T at 262,417. Integer math gives the Ultra 9 285 a 50.9% lead, scoring 164,869 against 80,922.

The narrowest margin appears in single-threaded performance. PassMark single-thread shows the Ultra 9 285 at 4,881 versus 3,736 for the i5-14500T, a 23.5% lead. Cinebench R15 single-core also shows a relatively smaller gap at 63.8%, with scores of 696 and 252. While the Ultra 9 285 still wins clearly, the single-thread gap is less dramatic than the multi-thread separations, suggesting the i5-14500T retains competitive per-core capability despite its older architecture.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses 24 cores and 24 threads. The Ultra 9 285 has no hyper-threading, which explains the equal core and thread counts.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The i5-14500T has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Ultra 9 285 starts at 2.50 GHz base and reaches 5.60 GHz boost. Both are locked multipliers, so neither supports user overclocking.

Thermal design power differs by 30 watts, with the i5-14500T at 35 watts and the Ultra 9 285 at 65 watts. The i5-14500T uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 9 285 requires Intel Socket 1851, meaning they are not platform-compatible.

Memory support also differs. The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The Ultra 9 285 supports only DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs as well, with the i5-14500T offering Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and the Ultra 9 285 offering Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics are different tiers: UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14500T versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units on the Ultra 9 285. Production status is Active for both. Release dates place the i5-14500T at January 2024 and the Ultra 9 285 at December 2024, roughly one year apart.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these processors is substantial. The Intel Core i5-14500T is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, using Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process node with a die size of 243 mm².

The foundry shift is notable. The i5-14500T is manufactured by Intel, while the Ultra 9 285 is produced by TSMC. The transistor count for the Ultra 9 285 is recorded at 17,800 million, while no comparable figure exists for the i5-14500T in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ in both size and organization. The i5-14500T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 9 285 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Each level of cache is larger on the Ultra 9 285, which contributes to its substantial performance advantage in memory-sensitive workloads.

The core count difference is paired with a threading strategy change. The i5-14500T supports 20 threads across 14 cores, indicating hyper-threading on some cores. The Ultra 9 285 has 24 threads across 24 cores, showing a move to a non-hyper-threaded design. This architectural choice, combined with the 3 nm process node and higher clock speeds, explains the Ultra 9 285's superior benchmark results across both single and multi-threaded tests.

The integrated graphics architecture also reflects generational change. The i5-14500T uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 9 285 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The database records no benchmark scores for the graphics units, but the architectural difference is clear from the specifications.