Intel Core i5-14500T vs Intel Core i9-10900K Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-14500T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.7 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-10900K

CORE STATE Comet Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.7 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,022
1,904
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
252
268
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
8,177
7,935
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,154
1,120
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,790
18,895
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,838
2,667
geekbench_multicore
11,894
10,583
geekbench_singlecore
2,229
1,711
passmark_data_compression
262,417
375,336
passmark_data_encryption
15,410
7,796
passmark_extended_instructions
16,043
24,620
passmark_find_prime_numbers
81
63
passmark_floating_point_math
58,869
53,123
passmark_integer_math
80,922
85,404
passmark_multithread
22,910
22,452
passmark_physics
1,288
1,029
passmark_random_string_sorting
28,462
46,389
passmark_single_thread
3,736
3,113
passmark_singlethread
3,736
3,113
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
8,257
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,688
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,313
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
6,221
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
8,938
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
851

Analysis: Intel Core i5-14500T vs Intel Core i9-10900K

The Intel Core i5-14500T and Intel Core i9-10900K represent two very different approaches to desktop performance, separated by four generations of architecture. The benchmark data reveals a surprisingly close overall contest, with the i5-14500T taking 12 of 19 head-to-head wins against 7 for the i9-10900K. However, the margin of victory in each test tells a more nuanced story: the i5-14500T wins by narrow margins in most cases, while the i9-10900K scores decisive victories in specific heavy workloads. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical (28065 for the i5-14500T versus 27872 for the i9-10900K), and both sit at the 80th and 79th percentile of all CPUs respectively. This is a matchup where workload selection matters more than raw capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single most dramatic result in this comparison is the Cinebench R23 multicore test, where the i9-10900K delivers a 18895 score against 11790 for the i5-14500T — a 37.6% advantage. This is the largest delta in either direction and confirms that the older i9 retains a serious lead in sustained multi-threaded rendering workloads. The single-core R23 result follows the same pattern: the i9-10900K scores 2667 versus 1838, a 31.1% gap. These are not small margins; they represent a generational difference in how each chip handles long-duration, high-intensity compute.

The i5-14500T fights back with equally impressive wins in other areas. The Geekbench single-core test shows a 30.3% advantage (2229 versus 1711), and the PassMark encryption test shows a staggering 97.7% lead (15410 versus 7796). The floating-point math test also goes to the i5-14500T with 58869 against 53123, a 10.8% margin. In the Cinebench R15 and R20 suites, the i5-14500T wins both multicore and single-core tests, though the margins are modest: 6.2% and 3% in multicore, and 3% in R20 single-core. The R15 single-core test is one of only two tests where the i9-10900K wins by a single-digit margin (6%).

The PassMark suite splits almost evenly by category. The i9-10900K wins data compression (375336 versus 262417, a 30.1% lead), extended instructions (24620 versus 16043, a 34.8% lead), integer math (85404 versus 80922, a 5.2% lead), and random string sorting (46389 versus 28462, a 38.6% lead). The i5-14500T counters with wins in find prime numbers (81 versus 63, a 28.6% lead), physics (1288 versus 1029, a 25.2% lead), and single-thread performance (3736 versus 3113, a 20% lead). The multithread test is essentially a tie at 22910 versus 22452, a 2% edge for the i5-14500T.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900K boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14500T boosts to 4.80 GHz. The i9-10900K also has a higher base clock at 3.70 GHz versus 1.70 GHz for the i5-14500T.

Q: Does the i5-14500T support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes. The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the i9-10900K supports only DDR4. The i9-10900K has a listed memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, but no such figure is provided for the i5-14500T.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i9-10900K has 10 cores and 20 threads. Both have the same thread count, but the i5-14500T has four additional physical cores.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each CPU?

A: The i5-14500T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the i9-10900K has a TDP of 125 watts. This indicates the i5-14500T is designed for much lower power operation.

Q: Which CPU has better single-thread performance in Geekbench?

A: The i5-14500T wins Geekbench single-core with a score of 2229 against 1711 for the i9-10900K, a 30.3% advantage. The same pattern appears in PassMark single-thread tests, where the i5-14500T scores 3736 versus 3113.

Q: Is the i9-10900K still in production?

A: No. The i9-10900K is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of 2020-04-29. The i5-14500T is active and was released on 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two chips is substantial. The i5-14500T is built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, while the i9-10900K uses Comet Lake on a 14 nm node. This process advantage is a key factor in the i5-14500T's ability to achieve higher performance per watt, reflected in its 35 watt TDP versus 125 watts for the i9-10900K. The die sizes are similar — 215 mm² for the i5-14500T and 206 mm² for the i9-10900K — but the newer node packs more functionality into that space.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The i5-14500T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-10900K has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The per-core L2 difference is particularly notable: 1.25 MB versus 256 KB represents a 5x increase in L2 capacity per core for the i5-14500T.

Memory support is another major divergence. The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the i9-10900K is limited to DDR4. The i5-14500T also supports ECC memory, which the i9-10900K does not. PCIe capabilities follow the same pattern: the i5-14500T offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i9-10900K provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the i5-14500T featuring UHD Graphics 770 and the i9-10900K using UHD Graphics 630.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ in an interesting way: the i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i9-10900K has 10 cores and 20 threads. The clock speeds favor the i9-10900K, which has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, compared to 1.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost for the i5-14500T. The TDP difference is dramatic: 35 watts versus 125 watts.

Socket compatibility is entirely different: the i5-14500T uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i9-10900K uses Intel Socket 1200. The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the i9-10900K supports only DDR4. The i9-10900K has a listed memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, but no such figure is provided for the i5-14500T. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14500T but not on the i9-10900K. The i5-14500T offers PCIe Gen 5, while the i9-10900K is limited to Gen 3. The i5-14500T has a locked multiplier, while the i9-10900K has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-14500T's launch MSRP was $232, and the i9-10900K's launch MSRP was $547. The i5-14500T remains active in production, while the i9-10900K is end-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-10900K is the clear choice for sustained multi-threaded rendering and compute tasks. Its 37.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and 31.1% lead in R23 single-core show that it excels in modern rendering engines that scale with both core count and high clocks. The PassMark results reinforce this: the i9-10900K wins data compression by 30.1%, extended instructions by 34.8%, and random string sorting by 38.6%. These are workloads that benefit from the i9-10900K's high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and its 10 full-size cores. Integer math also goes to the i9-10900K, though by a slim 5.2% margin.

The i5-14500T wins in nearly every other category, making it the more versatile everyday processor. Its 30.3% lead in Geekbench single-core suggests snappier responsiveness in typical desktop applications. The 97.7% encryption advantage is massive and indicates strong security-related performance. The 28.6% lead in find prime numbers and 25.2% lead in physics further demonstrate its strength in mathematical workloads. The floating-point math win of 10.8% shows the i5-14500T handles scientific calculations well. For general multi-threaded use, the i5-14500T wins PassMark multithread by 2% and Cinebench R20 multicore by 3%, indicating it is competitive in most productivity scenarios.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: choose the Intel Core i9-10900K if your primary workloads are long-running, heavily multithreaded render jobs or data compression tasks where its 37.6% Cinebench R23 multicore lead and 30.1% compression advantage will be directly visible. Its 5.30 GHz boost clock and unlocked multiplier also make it the better candidate for overclocking, though it comes with a 125 watt TDP and end-of-life status.

Choose the Intel Core i5-14500T for almost everything else. It wins 12 of 19 benchmarks, including decisive victories in single-thread performance (30.3% in Geekbench), encryption (97.7%), and physics (25.2%). It supports DDR5 and ECC memory, offers PCIe Gen 5, and does all of this at a 35 watt TDP — a 72% reduction in power draw. Its active production status and newer release date mean it remains a current option for new builds. The near-identical average benchmark scores (28065 versus 27872) confirm that the i5-14500T delivers comparable overall performance while consuming a fraction of the power and supporting modern platform features. For a new system, the i5-14500T is the more future-proof and efficient choice; the i9-10900K only makes sense if you already have a Socket 1200 platform and specifically need its rendering leadership.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-14500T
i9-10900K
Core Specs
Cores
14
10 -28.6%
Threads
20
20 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.7
3.7 +117.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.3 +10.4%
Frequency (GHz)
1.7
3.7 +117.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.3 +10.4%
Multiplier
17
37 +117.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
125 +257.1%
PL1
35 W
125 W
PL2
92 W
250 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Comet Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Comet Lake
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Core i9 (Comet Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
14 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
206 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
—
46.9 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1200
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
H410, B460, H470, Z490
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
—
E-Core Frequency
1200 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 630
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$232
$547
Part Number
SRN3P
SRH91
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA1200
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Core i5-14500T Details View Core i9-10900K Details