Intel Core i5-14490F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Comparison

Intel Core i5-14490F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100

The comparison between the Intel Core i5-14490F and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 is a study in contrasting design philosophies. The Intel chip is a desktop processor built for raw throughput, while the Qualcomm is a mobile-first part optimized for efficiency. The database contains a complete set of benchmark scores for the Intel processor, while the Qualcomm entry lacks any recorded benchmark results. This absence of data for the Snapdragon means that direct numerical comparisons are only possible in one direction, but the architectural specifications still provide a clear picture of their respective roles.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the only processor with measurable performance. It holds wins in every benchmark category present in the database, which is expected given that the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no benchmark entries. The Intel processor’s scores span multithreaded workloads, single-threaded tasks, and specific instruction-set operations. For example, the Intel chip delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 and a single-core score of 3247. In PassMark’s integer math test, it records 87844, and in floating-point math, it scores 66558.

The Qualcomm chip, with a percentile ranking of 50 against all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 0, cannot be said to win any recorded test. Its absence from the benchmark suite means the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the Intel part. The Intel i5-14490F sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, whereas the Snapdragon’s 50th percentile reflects its unmeasured status rather than any specific capability.

The use-case split is therefore defined by data availability. For any workload represented in the database, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the clear choice. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100, while architecturally distinct, has no recorded scores to support a performance claim. The Intel processor’s strengths lie in its high multicore throughput, as shown by the Cinebench R23 and PassMark multithread scores, while its single-thread performance is also robust, as indicated by the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1363.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R variant, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses the Oryon codename, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has 12 cores and 12 threads, indicating no hyperthreading. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, and it has a TDP of 35 watts. The Snapdragon’s cache structure is markedly different: 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and a shared 6 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has a larger L3 pool, while the Qualcomm part has larger per-core L1 and per-module L2 allocations.

Memory support also separates the two. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Qualcomm chip uses LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Intel chip does not list a memory bandwidth figure. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, whereas the Qualcomm part provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

The integrated graphics present another key distinction. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, marked as N/A, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 includes an Adreno X1-85 GPU. The market segments further reinforce the split: Intel targets desktop, Qualcomm targets mobile. The Intel chip’s die size is 215 mm², while the Snapdragon’s die size is not recorded. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has a launch MSRP listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The Intel Core i5-14490F has a full set of 17 benchmark scores, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has none. This means the only available numeric comparisons come from the Intel chip’s absolute scores. In Cinebench R15, the Intel processor scores 2318 in multicore and 327 in single-core. In R20, it achieves 9660 multicore and 1363 single-core. The R23 results show 23000 multicore and 3247 single-core.

PassMark tests further detail the Intel chip’s capabilities. Data compression yields 340026, data encryption scores 18225, and extended instructions reach 21731. Prime number finding scores 122, floating-point math 66558, and integer math 87844. The multithread score is 28662, physics scores 2093, and random string sorting reaches 35608. Single-thread performance is recorded at 3873, appearing twice in the data with identical values.

Without any Qualcomm scores, the head-to-head section is necessarily one-sided. The Intel i5-14490F’s average benchmark score is 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with an average score of 38194 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38103 with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 with a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 with a delta of -0.3%. These narrow deltas indicate the i5-14490F performs essentially on par with those processors, within fractions of a percent.

The Snapdragon’s average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking is a neutral placeholder, not a performance indicator. The data confirms that the Intel chip delivers measurable performance across all recorded tests, while the Qualcomm chip offers no verifiable scores in this database.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split based on intended use. The Intel Core i5-14490F is a desktop processor with extensive benchmark coverage, showing strong performance in both multicore and single-threaded workloads. Its scores place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38149. It matches closely with rivals like the Intel Core i5-13600KF, which has a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, with a delta of -0.1%. For users seeking a processor with proven performance in the recorded tests, the Intel part is the only option with data.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 is a mobile processor with no benchmark scores in the database. Its 50th percentile and average score of 0 reflect that absence. The chip’s specifications suggest a different design focus: 12 cores at 3.80 GHz base, a 35-watt TDP, and 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. It includes integrated graphics and uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, indicating a power-efficient design. However, without recorded performance data, no claims about its benchmark capabilities can be supported.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers measurable performance across all tested benchmarks, making it the appropriate choice for anyone relying on the database’s scores. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 remains an unmeasured entity in this database, so its performance relative to the Intel chip cannot be determined. The Intel processor’s 86th percentile ranking versus the Snapdragon’s 50th percentile highlights the gap in data completeness, not necessarily in raw capability.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has a boost clock of 4.20 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel processor include integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14490F has integrated graphics marked as N/A, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 includes an Adreno X1-85 GPU.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: How do their core and thread counts compare?

A: The Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Qualcomm chip has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a shared 24 MB L3 cache, whereas the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has a shared 6 MB L3 cache.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Qualcomm processor supports LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14490F | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 |

|----------------|----------------------|-------------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Oryon |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 12 MB (per module) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Adreno X1-85 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2023-12-31 | 2024-04-23 |

| Part Number | SRN35 | X1E84100 |