Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core i5-14490F and the Intel Processor U302L. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the wins counters for both processors are zero. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the Core i5-14490F and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The Intel Core i5-14490F has a comprehensive set of benchmark scores in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23000, and its single-core score is 3247. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 9660, with a single-core score of 1363. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2318, and the single-core score is 327. PassMark results for the Core i5-14490F include a multi-thread score of 28662, a single-thread score of 3873, integer math at 87844, floating point math at 66558, data compression at 340026, data encryption at 18225, extended instructions at 21731, find prime numbers at 122, physics at 2093, and random string sorting at 35608. The average benchmark score for the Core i5-14490F is 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

The Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it at the 50th percentile. Therefore, any quantitative performance comparison between the two parts is impossible based on the recorded data. The Core i5-14490F shows its performance capability through its scores, while the U302L has no measured data to compare.

Nearest rivals for the Core i5-14490F provide context for its scores. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has an average score of 38194, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i5-14490F. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, which is 0.3% higher. These deltas are minimal, indicating the Core i5-14490F sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every measurable category because it has recorded performance data, while the Intel Processor U302L has none. The Core i5-14490F delivers strong multi-core throughput, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28662. Its single-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3873.

The Core i5-14490F also demonstrates capability in specific workloads. Its PassMark integer math score of 87844 and floating point math score of 66558 indicate strong arithmetic processing. Data compression at 340026 and data encryption at 18225 show diverse workload handling. Extended instructions score 21731, and random string sorting reaches 35608. Physics processing scores 2093, and prime number finding scores 122.

The Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark wins because no scores exist in the database. Its 50th percentile placement with an average score of 0 reflects the absence of measured data, not a performance verdict. The part is specified for the mobile segment with a 15 TDP, whereas the Core i5-14490F is a desktop part with a 65 TDP. The U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads, compared to the Core i5-14490F's 10 cores and 16 threads. The U302L's base clock is 1.20 GHz with a boost clock of 2.40 GHz, while the Core i5-14490F runs at 2.50 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost.

For users prioritizing raw compute, the Core i5-14490F is the only option with recorded evidence of performance. The U302L's lack of data means its capabilities cannot be quantified from the database. The architectural differences, such as core count and clock speeds, favor the Core i5-14490F in any scenario requiring sustained processing. The U302L's integrated UHD Graphics 80EU provides a feature the Core i5-14490F lacks, as the desktop part has no integrated graphics, but no benchmark data exists to evaluate that GPU's performance.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14490F and the Intel Processor U302L share the Raptor Lake architecture but differ in several key specifications. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core i5-14490F carries the codename Raptor Lake-R and belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The U302L uses the codename Raptor Lake-PS and belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation.

Core configuration differs substantially. The Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. This gives the Core i5-14490F a 2:1 advantage in core count and a larger thread count advantage. Clock speeds also vary: the Core i5-14490F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. The Core i5-14490F's boost clock is more than double the U302L's boost clock.

Cache hierarchies are similar per core but differ in total L3. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The Core i5-14490F has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the U302L has 10 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Core i5-14490F more than twice the aggregate L3 capacity.

The TDP ratings reflect their market segments. The Core i5-14490F is a desktop part with a 65 TDP, while the U302L is a mobile part with a 15 TDP. Both use the Intel Socket 1700. The Core i5-14490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the U302L supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and neither supports ECC memory.

Integrated graphics differentiate the two. The Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (N/A), while the U302L includes UHD Graphics 80EU. This makes the U302L a self-contained solution for basic display output, while the Core i5-14490F requires a discrete GPU. The Core i5-14490F has a die size of 215 mm², while the U302L's die size is not recorded in the database.

Production status is active for both parts. The Core i5-14490F was released on 2023-12-31, and the U302L was released on 2024-04-07. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core i5-14490F's part number is SRN35, and the U302L's part number is SRPKGQ5CX. The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285, while the Core i5-14490F has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data in the database shows a clear separation between these two processors, but it is driven by the absence of benchmark records for the Intel Processor U302L rather than a direct performance comparison. The Intel Core i5-14490F has extensive benchmark data, with an average score of 38149 and a 86th percentile placement. The U302L has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile placement.

For anyone selecting a processor for compute-heavy workloads, the Core i5-14490F is the only part with measured evidence of capability. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28662 indicate strong parallel processing. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3247 and PassMark single-thread score of 3873 show solid per-thread performance. The U302L cannot be assessed for these workloads because no scores exist.

The architectural specifications reinforce the Core i5-14490F's advantage. Its 10 cores and 16 threads outnumber the U302L's 5 cores and 6 threads. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the U302L's 2.40 GHz boost clock. Its 24 MB L3 cache exceeds the U302L's 10 MB L3 cache. These differences are substantial and favor the Core i5-14490F in any processing scenario.

The U302L's strengths lie in its mobile orientation and integrated graphics. Its 15 TDP makes it a low-power option, and the UHD Graphics 80EU provides built-in display capability. The Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics and a 65 TDP, so it requires a discrete GPU and a desktop platform. For a compact or power-constrained system with basic graphical needs, the U302L has a structural advantage, but no performance data exists to quantify it.

The nearest rivals for the Core i5-14490F show it is competitive within its class. The Core Ultra 5 245T, Core i5-13600KF, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Core i5-13600HX all sit within 0.3% of its average score. This indicates the Core i5-14490F performs on par with these alternatives. The U302L has no nearest rivals listed, so no similar context exists.

The verdict from the data is straightforward. The Core i5-14490F is the higher-performing part based on every recorded metric and architectural specification. The U302L is a lower-power mobile processor with integrated graphics, but its performance cannot be verified from the database. Users requiring measurable compute performance should select the Core i5-14490F. Users needing a low-power processor with built-in graphics and no discrete GPU requirement may consider the U302L, but they do so without any benchmark evidence of its performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, which places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U302L have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel Processor U302L. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it is placed at the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Processor U302L includes UHD Graphics 80EU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65, and the Intel Processor U302L has a TDP of 15.