Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers significantly higher multi-core performance. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14490F scores 23,000 points in multi-core, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark results in the database for comparison.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both processors use Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Processor 300?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Processor 300 is $82. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,873. The Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14490F and Intel Processor 300 both belong to the Raptor Lake architecture family, but they target different segments of the desktop market. The i5-14490F is part of the Core 14th Gen series under the Raptor Lake-R codename, while the Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S codename within the Intel Processor lineup.

The most substantial architectural difference lies in core configuration. The i5-14490F provides 10 cores with 16 threads, a configuration designed for parallel workloads. The Intel Processor 300 offers only 2 cores and 4 threads, which limits its ability to handle multi-threaded tasks. This disparity in core counts directly drives the performance gap observed in benchmark data.

Clock speeds also differ. The i5-14490F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 runs at a base clock of 3.90 GHz with no boost clock recorded in the database. The higher base clock of the Intel Processor 300 may benefit lightly threaded tasks, but the i5-14490F's boost capability provides headroom for demanding single-core bursts.

Cache allocation favors the i5-14490F. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs significantly: the i5-14490F has 24 MB shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300 has only 6 MB shared L3 cache. This larger cache pool on the i5-14490F reduces latency when accessing frequently used data across all cores.

Process technology is identical at 10 nm, with Intel as the foundry for both. Die size differs, with the i5-14490F measuring 215 mm² and the Intel Processor 300 measuring 163 mm². The smaller die size of the Intel Processor 300 reflects its reduced core and cache footprint.

Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel memory buses. Neither processor supports ECC memory. Both also provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The key difference in integrated graphics: the i5-14490F lacks any integrated GPU, while the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Power specifications differ, with the i5-14490F rated at 65 W TDP and the Intel Processor 300 rated at 46 W TDP. The lower TDP of the Intel Processor 300 aligns with its smaller core count and reduced cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries directly comparing the Intel Core i5-14490F and Intel Processor 300. The Intel Processor 300 has zero recorded benchmark scores across all test suites. The Intel Core i5-14490F, by contrast, has a comprehensive benchmark record.

In Cinebench R15, the i5-14490F scores 2,318 in multi-core and 327 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 9,660 and single-core is 1,363. Cinebench R23 shows 23,000 in multi-core and 3,247 in single-core. These results place the i5-14490F at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Passmark tests for the i5-14490F show data compression at 340,026, data encryption at 18,225, extended instructions at 21,731, prime number finding at 122, floating point math at 66,558, integer math at 87,844, multithread at 28,662, physics at 2,093, random string sorting at 35,608, and single thread at 3,873.

Since the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmarks, no direct win margins can be calculated. The data indicates the i5-14490F holds every measurable performance advantage in the database, though the absence of Intel Processor 300 scores prevents quantifying the exact deltas.

The nearest rivals for the i5-14490F provide context for its position. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has an average score of 38,194 with a -0.1% delta relative to the i5-14490F. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103 with a +0.1% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 records 38,221 with a -0.2% delta. The Intel Core i5-13600HX reaches 38,261 with a -0.3% delta. These figures show the i5-14490F sits within a tight performance cluster, essentially tied with these four rival processors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14490F | Intel Processor 300 |

|---------------|----------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | None recorded |

| TDP | 65 W | 46 W |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Raptor Lake-S |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2023-12-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | SRN35 | SRN3J |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $82 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 38,149 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

The specification table shows that both processors share the same socket, process node, manufacturer, L1 cache per core, L2 cache per core, memory support, memory bus width, PCIe version and lane count, ECC support status, multiplier lock status, and market segment. The differences concentrate in core count, clock speeds, cache capacity, integrated graphics, die size, TDP, release timing, and part numbering.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a decisive advantage for the Intel Core i5-14490F. Its average benchmark score of 38,149 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default, reflecting its entry-level positioning.

For multi-threaded workloads, the i5-14490F is clearly superior. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with 24 MB of L3 cache and a 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 23,000. The Intel Processor 300's 2-core, 4-thread setup cannot match this parallel throughput, and the database offers no scores to suggest otherwise.

For lightweight or single-threaded tasks, the Intel Processor 300's higher base clock of 3.90 GHz could theoretically provide responsive performance, but the i5-14490F's boost clock of 5.00 GHz and its recorded single-core score of 3,247 in Cinebench R23 indicate superior peak single-thread capability. The Intel Processor 300's lack of recorded benchmarks prevents any empirical advantage from being demonstrated.

The Intel Processor 300 does hold advantages in specific areas: it includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), which the i5-14490F lacks entirely. It also has a lower TDP of 46 W compared to 65 W, and its die size is smaller at 163 mm² versus 215 mm². Its launch MSRP of $82 is recorded in the database, while the i5-14490F has no launch MSRP listed.

Users who require a CPU with integrated graphics for a system without a discrete GPU would need to select the Intel Processor 300, as the i5-14490F cannot output video without a separate graphics card. Users who prioritize raw compute performance across all benchmark categories should select the i5-14490F based on its extensive recorded scores.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i5-14490F wins in multi-core compute. The 10-core, 16-thread design with 24 MB of L3 cache delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 23,000 and Passmark multithread scores of 28,662. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position as a capable desktop processor for heavily threaded applications.

Intel Core i5-14490F wins in single-core performance based on recorded data. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz produces a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,873. No competing score exists from the Intel Processor 300 to challenge these figures.

Intel Core i5-14490F wins in cache capacity. The 24 MB shared L3 cache provides substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data, while the Intel Processor 300 offers only 6 MB. Larger cache reduces memory latency and improves throughput in data-intensive workloads.

Intel Processor 300 wins in integrated graphics availability. The UHD Graphics 710 enables video output without a discrete GPU, a feature entirely absent from the i5-14490F. Systems built around the Intel Processor 300 can operate with minimal components.

Intel Processor 300 wins in power efficiency based on specifications. The 46 W TDP is lower than the i5-14490F's 65 W TDP. The smaller die size of 163 mm² also indicates reduced silicon footprint, though performance trade-offs are substantial.

Intel Processor 300 wins in entry-level positioning. The 2-core, 4-thread configuration, lower TDP, and integrated graphics suit basic desktop tasks. Its launch MSRP of $82 is recorded in the database, while the i5-14490F has no launch MSRP listed.