Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-14490F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 7 268V

CORE STATE Lunar Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 17W
ARCHITECTURE Lunar Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,318
1,616
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
327
293
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,660
6,887
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,363
972
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
23,000
10,653
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,247
1,921
passmark_data_compression
340,026
181,443
passmark_data_encryption
18,225
13,779
passmark_extended_instructions
21,731
15,323
passmark_find_prime_numbers
122
192
passmark_floating_point_math
66,558
57,628
passmark_integer_math
87,844
42,669
passmark_multithread
28,662
19,297
passmark_physics
2,093
1,617
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,608
22,416
passmark_single_thread
3,873
4,051
passmark_singlethread
3,873
4,051
geekbench_multicore
N/A
9,963
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,270

Analysis: Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

FAQ

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall benchmark averages?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has an average score of 20897, placing it in the 74th percentile. The i5-14490F sits among rivals such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, -0.1%) and Intel Core i5-13600KF (38103, 0.1%), while the Ultra 7 268V is near the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (20900, 0%) and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20826, 0.3%).

Q: Which processor wins the majority of benchmark comparisons?

A: The i5-14490F wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The Ultra 7 268V wins 3, which include passmark_find_prime_numbers, passmark_single_thread, and passmark_singlethread.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in either direction?

A: The largest gap favors the i5-14490F in cinebench_r23_multicore, where it scores 23000 versus 10653 for the Ultra 7 268V, a delta of 115.9%. The largest gap favoring the Ultra 7 268V is in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where it scores 192 versus 122, a delta of -36.5%.

Q: How do the processors differ in core and thread counts?

A: The i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts. The Ultra 7 268V has a TDP of 17 watts, which is substantially lower.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: Both processors have a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The base clocks differ, with the i5-14490F at 2.50 GHz and the Ultra 7 268V at 2.20 GHz.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear split by market segment. The Intel Core i5-14490F, a desktop part with 10 cores and 16 threads, delivers decisively higher multi-threaded performance. Its average benchmark score of 38149 is 82.5% above the Ultra 7 268V's 20897. For workloads that scale across cores, the i5-14490F is the stronger choice by a wide margin.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, a mobile processor with 8 cores and 8 threads, counters with a lower TDP of 17 watts versus 65 watts. It also wins the two single-thread PassMark tests, scoring 4051 against 3873 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, a 4.4% advantage. This makes it suitable for scenarios where energy efficiency and light single-thread tasks matter more than raw throughput.

The verdict from the data: pick the i5-14490F for desktop workloads that demand high multi-core output, such as rendering or heavy computation. Pick the Ultra 7 268V for mobile systems where the 17-watt TDP and integrated Arc 140V graphics are priorities, and where its single-thread PassMark edge can be exploited.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The i5-14490F dominates the Cinebench suite. In cinebench_r15_multicore, it scores 2318 against 1616, a 43.4% lead. The gap widens in cinebench_r20_multicore, 9660 versus 6887, a 40.3% delta. The most extreme result is cinebench_r23_multicore, where the i5-14490F scores 23000 and the Ultra 7 268V scores 10653, a 115.9% advantage. Single-core Cinebench results also favor the i5-14490F, though by smaller margins: 327 versus 293 in r15 (11.6%), 1363 versus 972 in r20 (40.2%), and 3247 versus 1921 in r23 (69%).

In PassMark tests, the i5-14490F wins most categories. Data compression shows 340026 versus 181443, an 87.4% lead. Integer math scores 87844 against 42669, a 105.9% delta. Random string sorting favors the i5-14490F at 35608 versus 22416, a 58.9% gap. Extended instructions score 21731 versus 15323, a 41.8% lead. Multithread performance is 28662 versus 19297, a 48.5% advantage. Data encryption scores 18225 versus 13779, a 32.3% lead. Physics tests show 2093 versus 1617, a 29.4% gap. Floating point math is closer, with 66558 versus 57628, a 15.5% lead.

The Ultra 7 268V wins three tests. In passmark_find_prime_numbers, it scores 192 against 122, a 36.5% advantage. In both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, it scores 4051 against 3873, a 4.4% lead. These wins indicate a specific strength in prime number calculation and a modest edge in single-thread PassMark performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the i5-14490F and 2.20 GHz for the Ultra 7 268V, with both boosting to 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially: 65 watts for the i5-14490F, 17 watts for the Ultra 7 268V. The socket types are incompatible: the i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 268V uses Intel BGA 2833. The i5-14490F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the Ultra 7 268V's memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard.

PCIe lanes differ: the i5-14490F provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ultra 7 268V provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, while the Ultra 7 268V includes Arc 140V graphics.

The i5-14490F is a desktop-market part released on 2023-12-31, while the Ultra 7 268V is a mobile-market part released on 2024-09-23. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production. Part numbers are SRN35 for the i5-14490F and SRPMLSRPMX for the Ultra 7 268V.

Architecture Differences

The underlying architectures are distinct generations. The i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-R) from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The Ultra 7 268V uses Lunar Lake architecture from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on TSMC's 3 nm process with no die size recorded.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The i5-14490F has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 268V has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the i5-14490F aligns with its multi-core advantage, while the Ultra 7 268V has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches.

The production process also differs. The i5-14490F is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm node, while the Ultra 7 268V is fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm node. This process difference contributes to the Ultra 7 268V's lower TDP of 17 watts versus 65 watts.

Both processors support dual-channel memory and do not support ECC memory. Neither has v-cache. The integrated graphics situation is a major architectural divergence: the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, while the Ultra 7 268V includes Arc 140V.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14490F is the clear winner for multi-threaded, compute-heavy desktop workloads. Its Cinebench r23 multicore score of 23000 is more than double the Ultra 7 268V's 10653. Integer math, data compression, and random string sorting all show leads of 58.9% or greater. Users running rendering, video encoding, database compression, or scientific calculations would see substantial gains from the i5-14490F's 10 cores and 16 threads.

The Ultra 7 268V wins in specific niches. Its passmark_find_prime_numbers score of 192 against 122 indicates a 36.5% advantage in prime-number generation workloads. Its passmark_single_thread score of 4051 against 3873 gives it a 4.4% edge in single-thread PassMark tasks. These wins, combined with a TDP of 17 watts, make it suitable for mobile devices where battery life is critical and workloads do not scale across many cores.

The i5-14490F also wins in floating point math, scoring 66558 against 57628, a 15.5% lead. Data encryption shows a 32.3% advantage for the i5-14490F, and physics simulations favor it by 29.4%. The i5-14490F's average benchmark score of 38149 versus 20897 for the Ultra 7 268V confirms its overall performance dominance, while the Ultra 7 268V's 74th percentile ranking versus the i5-14490F's 86th percentile reflects this gap in aggregate terms.

For mobile users who need integrated graphics, the Ultra 7 268V's Arc 140V is the only option, as the i5-14490F has none. The BGA 2833 socket and 17-watt TDP position the Ultra 7 268V for thin-and-light laptops. The i5-14490F, with its Socket 1700 and 65-watt TDP, belongs in desktop builds where cooling and power are less constrained.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-14490F
Ultra 7 268V
Core Specs
Cores
10
8 -20.0%
Threads
16
8 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.5
2.2 -12.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.5
2.2 -12.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5 0.0%
Multiplier
25
22 -12.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
17 -73.8%
PL1
65 W
—
PL2
148 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Lunar Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Lunar Lake
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Ultra 7 (Lunar Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
—
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
unknown Depends on motherboard
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel BGA 2833
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 48 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
—
Arc 140V
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
SRN35
SRPMLSRPMX
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i5-14490F Details View Core Ultra 7 268V Details