Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL Comparison

Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL

The Intel Core i5-14490F and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL target fundamentally different desktop use cases. The i5-14490F is a high-frequency Raptor Lake part with a 10-core, 16-thread configuration, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL is a Meteor Lake-PS part with a 16-core, 22-thread configuration, a 4.80 GHz boost clock, and a 45 W TDP. Benchmark results show the i5-14490F delivers substantially higher single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL offers a lower TDP, a newer process node, and integrated Arc graphics, making it suited for different workload priorities.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14490F dominates in raw compute performance across every recorded benchmark. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 and single-core score of 3247 are strong indicators of both heavily threaded and lightly threaded capability. In PassMark tests, the i5-14490F posts 87844 in integer math, 66558 in floating point math, and 28662 in multithread, all of which are significantly higher than what the Core Ultra 7 155HL can sustain, based on the latter's lower clock speeds and the overall performance percentile gap. The i5-14490F also holds a percentile rank of 86 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

The Core Ultra 7 155HL wins in efficiency and platform features rather than computational throughput. Its 45 W TDP is lower than the i5-14490F's 65 W TDP, which directly translates to less heat generation and a potentially simpler cooling solution. The Core Ultra 7 155HL also integrates Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics, allowing a system to operate without a discrete graphics card, whereas the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics. The Core Ultra 7 155HL uses a newer 7 nm process node compared to the i5-14490F's 10 nm node, which contributes to its power efficiency. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, a specification not provided for the i5-14490F.

The i5-14490F is the clear performance winner for CPU-intensive tasks such as rendering, encoding, and complex calculations. The Core Ultra 7 155HL is the choice for a compact or low-power desktop where integrated graphics and reduced power draw are priorities, accepting a significant performance trade-off.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use different core architectures. The i5-14490F is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10-core design with 16 threads, which indicates a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The process node is 10 nm, and the die size is 215 mm².

The Core Ultra 7 155HL is based on Meteor Lake, specifically the Meteor Lake-PS variant, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1. It uses a 16-core, 22-thread configuration, which includes a mix of performance, efficiency, and low-power efficiency cores. Its cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and the same 24 MB of shared L3 cache as the i5-14490F. The process node is 7 nm, a newer manufacturing technology than the i5-14490F's 10 nm node.

The socket and platform differ entirely. The i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Intel Socket 1851. The i5-14490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 155HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL supports DDR5 memory that depends on the motherboard. The i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, whereas the Core Ultra 7 155HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the recorded data, as the Core Ultra 7 155HL has no benchmark entries. However, the i5-14490F's scores can be contextualized by its nearest rivals in the database. The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, has an average score of 38194, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the i5-14490F is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a delta of +0.1%, again a near tie. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a delta of -0.3%. These deltas show the i5-14490F sits in a tightly packed performance band among its closest competitors.

The Core Ultra 7 155HL has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of zero, placing it at the 50th percentile. This absence of data means any direct performance comparison between the two specific processors cannot be made from the database. The available data does show the i5-14490F's strengths in specific workloads: 340026 in data compression, 18225 in data encryption, 21731 in extended instructions, 122 in find prime numbers, 35608 in random string sorting, and 3873 in single-thread performance. These figures confirm the i5-14490F is a capable all-around performer, but the Core Ultra 7 155HL's relative standing cannot be quantified.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads.

Q: Do both processors feature integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has a TDP of 45 W.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F uses a 10 nm process node. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL uses a 7 nm process node.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on multiple specification fields. The Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 2.50 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads, a base clock of 1.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The TDP is 65 W for the i5-14490F and 45 W for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. The i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Intel Socket 1851. The architecture is Raptor Lake for the i5-14490F and Meteor Lake for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. The process node is 10 nm for the i5-14490F and 7 nm for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. The die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14490F and not recorded for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. L1 cache is 80 KB per core for the i5-14490F and 112 KB per core for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14490F and 2 MB per core for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. L3 cache is 24 MB shared for both. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the i5-14490F, and DDR5 depending on motherboard for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. Memory bandwidth is not recorded for the i5-14490F and is 89.6 GB/s for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the i5-14490F and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. Integrated graphics are N/A for the i5-14490F and Arc Xe-LPG 128EU for the Core Ultra 7 155HL. The i5-14490F has a launch MSRP not recorded, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL has a launch MSRP of $438.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates the Intel Core i5-14490F is the superior processor for performance-oriented workloads. Its recorded benchmark scores, including 23000 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3873 in PassMark single-thread, show a level of capability that the Core Ultra 7 155HL cannot match, given the latter's significantly lower base clock and the fact that it has no recorded benchmark data. The i5-14490F's 86th percentile ranking further supports its standing as a high-performance desktop CPU. Its support for PCIe Gen 5 and both DDR4 and DDR5 memory adds platform flexibility.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL is the appropriate choice when power consumption and integrated graphics are the primary considerations. Its 45 W TDP is lower than the i5-14490F's 65 W, and its Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU. The newer 7 nm process node and higher core count (16 cores, 22 threads) suggest a design focused on efficiency rather than peak throughput. Its 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark scores indicate it is not positioned for demanding compute tasks.

The verdict is straightforward: the i5-14490F for raw performance, the Core Ultra 7 155HL for an efficient, all-in-one desktop platform. The i5-14490F's higher clocks and proven benchmark results make it the choice for CPU-intensive applications, while the Core Ultra 7 155HL's lower power draw and integrated graphics make it the choice for a basic or compact system.