Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and the Intel Core i5-14490F are two desktop processors that land in the same performance bracket, but they achieve it through entirely different designs. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 245T is the newer, more efficient part built on a 3 nm process, while the Core i5-14490F is a 10 nm design with more threads. While their average benchmark scores are nearly identical, the specific workloads where each excels are very different.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear split. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T wins 15 out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, including every Cinebench test and most PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-14490F takes the remaining two wins, both in specific PassMark sub-tests. If you are looking at raw processing power for most tasks, the Core Ultra 5 245T is the stronger choice. Its lead in single-core performance is substantial, and its multi-core scores are consistently ahead.

However, the Core i5-14490F is not obsolete. Its wins in data compression and random string sorting show it has strengths in specific memory-intensive workloads. For users whose primary tasks involve those areas, the older chip remains competitive. The data also shows both processors sit at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning they are both high-end parts. The average benchmark scores are 38194 for the Ultra 5 245T and 38149 for the i5-14490F, a difference of only 0.1%. The Core Ultra 5 245T is the better all-rounder, but the Core i5-14490F is a specialist that holds its own in a few key areas.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T dominates in almost every category. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 26208 against 23000, a 13.9% advantage. This trend continues in single-core tests, where it scores 3699 versus 3247 in Cinebench R23, another 13.9% lead. The data indicates the Ultra 5 245T is the superior processor for general computing, content creation, and any workload that benefits from high clock speeds and modern architecture. Its wins in PassMark floating point math (108499 vs 66558, a 63% lead) and integer math (88676 vs 87844) reinforce this.

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in data compression with a score of 340026 compared to 283812, a 16.5% margin. It also takes random string sorting at 35608 versus 34931, a 1.9% lead. These are the only two tests it wins, and they are specific to data manipulation tasks. The i5-14490F has 16 threads compared to the Ultra 5 245T's 14 threads, which may contribute to its performance in these highly parallel, memory-access-heavy workloads. If your primary use case is file compression or sorting large datasets, the i5-14490F is the better choice based on this data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use hyper-threading. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating it uses hyper-threading to reach that thread count.

These architectural differences lead to different cache layouts. The Ultra 5 245T has 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14490F has 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, also with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Ultra 5 245T likely contribute to its better single-threaded performance. The i5-14490F also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, while the Ultra 5 245T only supports DDR5. The Ultra 5 245T has a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14490F does not have a listed memory bandwidth figure. The Ultra 5 245T also supports ECC memory, which the i5-14490F does not. Another key difference is the integrated graphics: the Ultra 5 245T includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs, while the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14490F's boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T uses Intel Socket 1851, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap in the head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 324 compared to the i5-14490F's 122, a 165.6% difference.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14490F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs.

Q: Which CPU has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 threads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in PassMark's find prime numbers test. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 324, which is 165.6% higher than the i5-14490F's 122. This is a massive victory and suggests the newer architecture has dramatically superior integer processing capability for certain algorithms. Similarly, in floating point math, the Ultra 5 245T scores 108499 against 66558, a 63% lead. These results show the Ultra 5 245T is significantly better at heavy mathematical computation.

The Cinebench results are consistent across all versions. In Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, the Ultra 5 245T wins both multi-core and single-core tests by 13.8% to 13.9%. For instance, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 26208 vs 23000, while single-core shows 3699 vs 3247. This consistency indicates a solid, across-the-board performance advantage for the Ultra 5 245T in rendering workloads. The data encryption test also shows a significant win for the Ultra 5 245T, scoring 23656 versus 18225, a 29.8% difference.

The i5-14490F fights back in data compression. It scores 340026 versus 283812, a 16.5% margin in its favor. This is a notable win because it shows the older chip is not strictly slower. It also wins random string sorting, scoring 35608 versus 34931, a 1.9% lead. These two wins suggest that the i5-14490F's higher thread count of 16 might be an advantage in workloads that are heavily parallel and involve significant data movement. Despite these wins, the overall benchmark score remains nearly tied, with the Ultra 5 245T at 38194 and the i5-14490F at 38149.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 5 245T | Intel Core i5-14490F |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 14 | 10 |

| Threads | 14 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1851 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | N/A |

| Transistor Count | 17,800 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 243 mm² | 215 mm² |