Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA Comparison

Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA

The Intel Core i5-14490F and Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA represent two distinct generations of desktop processors, with the former built on Raptor Lake architecture and the latter on Arrow Lake. The database contains extensive benchmark data for the i5-14490F, while the Ultra 5 235TA has no recorded benchmark scores, making a direct numerical comparison impossible. The i5-14490F achieves an average benchmark score of 38,149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Ultra 5 235TA has an average score of zero and sits in the 50th percentile. The i5-14490F’s nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 5 245T with an average score of 38,194 (a 0.1% difference), the Core i5-13600KF at 38,103 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221 (0.2% lower), and the Core i5-13600HX at 38,261 (0.3% lower). These figures indicate that the i5-14490F performs within a narrow band of comparable processors, while the Ultra 5 235TA lacks any measured performance data in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14490F has a comprehensive set of benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,318 points in multi-core and 327 points in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 9,660 points multi-core and 1,363 points single-core. The Cinebench R23 test yields 23,000 points multi-core and 3,247 points single-core. These scores place the processor in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, which indicates it outperforms a significant majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 38,149 reflects consistent performance across all recorded tests.

Passmark results for the i5-14490F include data compression at 340,026, data encryption at 18,225, extended instructions at 21,731, prime number finding at 122, floating point math at 66,558, integer math at 87,844, multithread at 28,662, physics at 2,093, random string sorting at 35,608, and single-thread at 3,873. The single-thread test appears twice in the database with identical scores, confirming the measurement. These numbers show strong computational throughput across varied workloads, with integer math and floating point operations showing particularly high scores relative to typical desktop processors.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, but this ranking appears to be a default value rather than a measured result. Without any Cinebench or Passmark data, there is no basis for a quantitative head-to-head comparison. The absence of scores means the database cannot confirm how the Ultra 5 235TA performs in multi-core rendering, single-core tasks, or any other standardized test. The nearest rivals list for this processor is empty, further indicating that no comparative performance data exists.

The i5-14490F’s nearest rival comparisons provide context for its performance level. The Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14490F’s 38,149. The Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103, representing a 0.1% deficit relative to the i5-14490F. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221, which is 0.2% ahead of the i5-14490F. The Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261, a 0.3% advantage. These delta values are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i5-14490F sits in a tightly competitive cluster of processors. The data shows that the i5-14490F delivers performance nearly identical to these four rivals, with differences so small they fall within typical measurement variance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every measurable category because it has recorded benchmark data, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA has none. The i5-14490F’s strong multi-core scores, such as 23,000 in Cinebench R23 and 9,660 in Cinebench R20, indicate it handles heavily threaded workloads effectively. Its Passmark multithread score of 28,662 and integer math score of 87,844 reinforce this capability. For single-thread performance, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,247 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,873 show solid responsiveness for lightly threaded applications.

The Ultra 5 235TA cannot be assigned any wins based on the database, as no test results exist. Its specifications suggest it targets a different market position with 14 cores and 14 threads, but without benchmark data, any performance advantage remains unverified. The i5-14490F’s 86th percentile ranking places it above the median, while the Ultra 5 235TA’s 50th percentile is a placeholder that does not reflect actual measured performance.

In terms of use cases, the i5-14490F’s benchmark profile supports its use in tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where multi-core scores like 23,000 in Cinebench R23 translate to faster completion times. Its single-core scores, including 3,247 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicate strong performance for everyday desktop tasks and applications that rely on single-thread speed. The Ultra 5 235TA, with its higher core count of 14 versus 10, may theoretically handle parallel workloads, but the database provides no evidence to confirm this. The i5-14490F remains the only processor in this comparison with verified performance data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Ultra 5 235TA. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking of 50 is not backed by any recorded test results.

Q: How does the i5-14490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14490F’s average score of 38,149 is within 0.3% of four rivals: the Core Ultra 5 245T (38,194, 0.1% higher), the Core i5-13600KF (38,103, 0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221, 0.2% higher), and the Core i5-13600HX (38,261, 0.3% higher).

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the i5-14490F?

A: The i5-14490F scores 23,000 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,247 points in single-core.

Q: Which processor has a higher core count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA has 14 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores. The Ultra 5 235TA also has 14 threads, whereas the i5-14490F has 16 threads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Ultra 5 235TA?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA is $269. The i5-14490F has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i5-14490F and Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA differ across several core specifications. The i5-14490F uses 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Ultra 5 235TA uses 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the i5-14490F and 2.20 GHz for the Ultra 5 235TA, with both sharing a 5.00 GHz boost clock. Thermal design power is identical at 65 watts for both processors. The i5-14490F fits the Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 235TA uses Intel Socket 1851.

Memory support differs significantly: the i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas the Ultra 5 235TA supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Ultra 5 235TA has a listed memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14490F has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe lanes also differ: the i5-14490F provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the Ultra 5 235TA provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Ultra 5 235TA includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU, while the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

Release dates show the i5-14490F launched on December 31, 2023, and the Ultra 5 235TA launched on July 28, 2025. The i5-14490F has a part number of SRN35, and the Ultra 5 235TA has a part number of SRWPP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-14490F has no launch MSRP, while the Ultra 5 235TA has a launch MSRP of $269.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Core i5-14490F is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The die size is 215 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235TA uses Arrow Lake architecture with the codename Arrow Lake-S, part of the Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, a different foundry than Intel. The transistor count is listed as 17,800 million, and the die size is 243 mm². Cache sizes are larger per core: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and the same 24 MB of shared L3 cache as the i5-14490F.

The process node difference is notable: 10 nm for the i5-14490F versus 3 nm for the Ultra 5 235TA. The smaller process typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, though the database does not include power consumption measurements. The transistor count of 17,800 million for the Ultra 5 235TA is recorded, while the i5-14490F has no transistor count listed. The die size is larger on the Ultra 5 235TA at 243 mm² versus 215 mm² for the i5-14490F.

The Ultra 5 235TA’s integrated graphics unit, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU, represents an architectural addition not present on the i5-14490F. The memory support difference, with the i5-14490F accepting DDR4 and DDR5 while the Ultra 5 235TA accepts only DDR5, reflects the newer platform’s reliance on current-generation memory. The PCIe lane count of 20 for the Ultra 5 235TA versus 16 for the i5-14490F provides additional expansion capability. These architectural differences are clear from the recorded data, though their performance impact remains unquantified for the Ultra 5 235TA due to the absence of benchmark scores.