Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F holds an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores and 18 threads, while the Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core i5-14490F boosts to 5.00 GHz compared to the Ultra 5's 4.60 GHz boost.

Q: What are the cache configurations for each processor?

A: The Core i5-14490F has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB L2 and 80 KB L1 per core. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, with 2 MB L2 and 112 KB L1 per core.

Q: Which processor has a higher power envelope?

A: The Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has a TDP of 45. This indicates the Core i5 is rated for a higher sustained power draw.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The Core Ultra 5 135HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated graphics. The Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: Which processor supports newer PCIe technology?

A: The Core i5-14490F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 135HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from distinct architectural lineages within Intel's lineup. The Core i5-14490F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. This is a refresh of Intel's hybrid design, utilizing a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 135HL, in contrast, belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1, based on the Meteor Lake architecture with the Meteor Lake-PS codename. This architecture uses a 7 nm process node, also from Intel's foundry.

The core topology differs significantly. The Core i5-14490F offers 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL offers 14 cores and 18 threads. This suggests a different hybrid arrangement, as the Ultra 5's thread count does not scale directly with its core count. The Core i5-14490F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, whereas the Core Ultra 5 135HL operates at a lower 1.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. Clock speed advantage sits firmly with the Core i5-14490F, which can exceed the Ultra 5's maximum by 0.40 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Core i5-14490F features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 135HL features larger per-core allocations on L1 and L2, at 112 KB and 2 MB respectively, but a smaller shared L3 pool at 18 MB. This means the Core i5-14490F can hold more total data in its last-level cache, while the Ultra 5's per-core caches are more generous.

Memory support sets them apart as well. The Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL supports DDR5, with the specific type depending on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14490F has no such figure recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The PCIe interface differs by generation and lane count. The Core i5-14490F uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 135HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Core i5-14490F a clear advantage for high-bandwidth expansion devices such as discrete GPUs or NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics situation is a major divergence. The Core Ultra 5 135HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated graphics, making it a self-contained solution for systems without a discrete GPU. The Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a separate graphics card for display output.

The socket platforms are incompatible. The Core i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL uses Intel Socket 1851. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Core i5-14490F has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded die size.

The Verdict

The benchmark data strongly favors the Intel Core i5-14490F for raw computational performance. Its average benchmark score of 38149 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, a substantial margin over the Core Ultra 5 135HL's 50th percentile standing. The Core i5-14490F also has a full set of recorded benchmark results, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has none, meaning the database contains no evidence of competitive performance for the Ultra 5.

For users building a desktop system around a discrete GPU, the Core i5-14490F is the clear choice. It offers higher boost clocks, more L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support, and a proven benchmark record. Its lack of integrated graphics is irrelevant when a dedicated graphics card is present. The Core i5-14490F also supports DDR4 memory, which can reduce platform costs for those reusing older memory.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL appeals to a different use case. Its integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics remove the need for a separate GPU, and its 45 TDP suggests lower power draw. The 14-core configuration with larger per-core L1 and L2 caches could benefit workloads that scale across many threads, but without recorded benchmarks, the database cannot confirm this advantage. The Ultra 5 also uses the newer Socket 1851 and PCIe Gen 4, which may be relevant for platform longevity but offer less bandwidth than Gen 5.

The data indicates no contest in measured performance. The Core i5-14490F's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-13600KF with an average score of 38103 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (0.2% ahead). The Core i5-14490F sits within 0.3% of these comparable processors, showing it is competitive with its peers. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has no nearest rivals recorded, reinforcing its lack of benchmark presence.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14490F | Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL |

|----------------|----------------------|--------------------------|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 1 |

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 18 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 | 45 |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Meteor Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Meteor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | N/A |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 (depends on motherboard) |

| Memory Bandwidth | N/A | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Arc Xe-LPG 128EU |

| Release Date | 2023-12-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Part Number | SRN35 | SRN33 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 38149 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core i5-14490F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. However, the Core i5-14490F has extensive individual benchmark records, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has none.

The Core i5-14490F's benchmark results show strong performance across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 23000 in multi-core and 3247 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it records 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 2318 multi-core and 327 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads effectively.

PassMark results for the Core i5-14490F cover a range of compute tasks. It scores 340026 in data compression, 18225 in data encryption, 21731 in extended instructions, and 122 in find prime numbers. Floating point math scores 66558, integer math scores 87844, and multithread performance scores 28662. Physics tests show 2093, random string sorting shows 35608, and single-thread performance shows 3873. The average benchmark score across all tests is 38149.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL's benchmark array is entirely empty, with an average benchmark score of 0. This means the database provides no measured evidence of its computational capabilities. The 50th percentile ranking reflects this lack of data rather than a confirmed performance level.

Without head-to-head results, direct comparisons rely on the Core i5-14490F's recorded scores and the Ultra 5's absence of scores. The Core i5-14490F demonstrates a complete performance profile, while the Ultra 5 remains unquantified in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every measured benchmark category, based on the recorded data. Its 38149 average benchmark score, 86th percentile ranking, and full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results give it a decisive edge in all tested workloads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock, 24 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support further reinforce its position for performance-sensitive applications such as gaming, content creation, and scientific computing.

The Core i5-14490F also wins on platform flexibility. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows builders to choose between older and newer memory standards. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide double the lane count and a newer generation compared to the Ultra 5's 8 Gen 4 lanes. For users with high-bandwidth GPUs or storage devices, this is a meaningful advantage.

The Core Ultra 5 135HL wins in specific unmeasured areas, based on its specifications. Its integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics make it a self-contained option for basic display output, media playback, or light GPU-accelerated tasks without a discrete card. The 45 TDP indicates a lower power envelope than the Core i5-14490F's 65 TDP, which could suit compact or energy-conscious systems.

The Ultra 5's 14 cores and 18 threads provide additional parallel execution resources, potentially benefiting workloads that scale linearly with core count. Its larger per-core L1 (112 KB) and L2 (2 MB) caches may improve performance in data-local workloads, though no benchmarks confirm this. The 7 nm process node is newer than the 10 nm node of the Core i5-14490F, which could contribute to efficiency gains.

The release timeline also favors the Ultra 5, as it launched on 2024-04-07 compared to the Core i5-14490F's 2023-12-31 release. Both processors remain active in production status. Neither processor is multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is not a differentiating factor.

In summary, the Core i5-14490F wins on all recorded performance metrics, cache capacity, PCIe bandwidth, and memory compatibility. The Core Ultra 5 135HL wins on integrated graphics availability, core count, per-core cache size, and lower TDP, though these advantages lack benchmark confirmation in the database.