Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison
Intel Core i5-14401TE
Processor 300T
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Processor 300T
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14401TE against the Intel Processor 300T. The winsA and winsB fields both show zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This absence of comparative measurements means that any direct performance relationship between these two processors must be inferred from their architectural specifications rather than from executed test workloads. Both processors sit at the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database, which indicates that the aggregate benchmark score for each lands at the median of the recorded distribution, though the avgBenchmarkScore field shows zero for both, suggesting that no averaged performance data has been populated for either unit.
Without direct scores, the most informative specification delta is the core and thread disparity. The Core i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T provides 2 cores and 4 threads. That is a 200% difference in core count and a 200% difference in thread count. In heavily threaded workloads, the i5-14401TE has three times the parallel execution resources. The boost clock situation also differs sharply: the i5-14401TE reaches 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300T has no boost clock listed at all, meaning it operates at its fixed 3.40 GHz base clock under all conditions. The i5-14401TE therefore has a 1.10 GHz higher maximum clock speed available for single-threaded bursts.
Architecture Differences
Both processors are built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, share the same 10 nm process node, and use Intel as the foundry. The i5-14401TE carries the Raptor Lake-R codename, while the Intel Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S. Both fit the Intel Socket 1700. The die sizes diverge: the i5-14401TE measures 215 mm², while the Intel Processor 300T measures 163 mm². That 52 mm² difference reflects the larger physical implementation required for the additional cores and shared cache.
The cache hierarchy diverges substantially. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, so the per-core cache structure is identical. The L3 cache, however, is very different. The i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300T has only 6 MB of shared L3 cache. That is a 14 MB advantage for the i5-14401TE. With six cores sharing 20 MB, each core can draw from a larger pool of frequently accessed data, which reduces the need to fetch from memory. The 300T's smaller 6 MB pool is more constrained, especially given that its two cores share the same pool.
Integrated graphics differ as well. The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. Both are integrated GPU solutions, but the 730 variant sits above the 710 in Intel's integrated graphics lineup. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14401TE but absent on the Intel Processor 300T. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-14401TE carries the part number Q4T4SRNJP, while the Intel Processor 300T carries SRN3K.
The release dates place the Intel Processor 300T earlier, launching on January 7, 2024, while the i5-14401TE launched on June 30, 2024. The 300T has a launch MSRP of $82, while the i5-14401TE has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both processors remain in active production.
FAQ
Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?
A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The i5-14401TE provides three times the core count and three times the thread count.
Q: What are the clock speed differences?
A: The i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock, so it operates at 3.40 GHz. The i5-14401TE has a 1.10 GHz higher maximum clock speed.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300T does not.
Q: What is the L3 cache capacity for each?
A: The i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14401TE has 14 MB more L3 cache.
Q: What integrated graphics do they use?
A: The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.
Q: What is the power draw difference?
A: The i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts. The 300T draws 10 watts less.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ on the following recorded fields. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores versus 2 cores. It has 12 threads versus 4 threads. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz versus 3.40 GHz. It has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the 300T has no boost clock. TDP is 45 watts versus 35 watts. The codename is Raptor Lake-R versus Raptor Lake-S. The generation field reads "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)" versus "Intel Processor (Raptor Lake)". Die size is 215 mm² versus 163 mm². L3 cache is 20 MB shared versus 6 MB shared. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14401TE but not on the 300T. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 versus UHD Graphics 710. The release date is June 30, 2024 versus January 7, 2024. The launch MSRP for the 300T is $82, while the i5-14401TE has no recorded launch MSRP. The part numbers differ: Q4T4SRNJP versus SRN3K. The series field is populated as "Core 14th Gen" for the i5-14401TE, while the 300T has no series recorded.
The two processors share several characteristics: both use Intel Socket 1700, both use the Raptor Lake architecture, both use a 10 nm process node, both are fabricated by Intel, both have 80 KB L1 per core, both have 1.25 MB L2 per core, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both use a dual-channel memory bus, both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, both are desktop market segment parts, both are in active production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in every scenario that benefits from parallel execution. Its 6 cores and 12 threads give it a 3x advantage in core and thread count over the 2-core, 4-thread Intel Processor 300T. Workloads such as compiling large codebases, running multiple virtual machines, video encoding, and 3D rendering would all lean toward the i5-14401TE because of this thread disparity. The 20 MB shared L3 cache versus 6 MB also favors the i5-14401TE in workloads with large working sets, where more data can stay resident on-chip. The boost clock of 4.50 GHz gives the i5-14401TE headroom for short single-threaded bursts that the 300T cannot match, since the 300T has no boost clock and sits at 3.40 GHz. ECC memory support on the i5-14401TE makes it the only one of the two that can be used in environments requiring error-correcting memory, such as certain workstation or server-like setups.
The Intel Processor 300T wins in power-constrained scenarios. Its 35 watt TDP is 10 watts lower than the i5-14401TE's 45 watt TDP. For a compact desktop build with a modest cooling solution or a system running under continuous load, the lower TDP translates to less heat output and potentially quieter operation. The 300T also has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, which means that in lightly threaded workloads that do not boost, the 300T may respond faster because it starts from a higher clock. Its smaller die size of 163 mm² versus 215 mm² suggests a cheaper physical implementation, and the recorded launch MSRP of $82 for the 300T, with no price recorded for the i5-14401TE, indicates that the 300T sits in a lower cost tier. For basic office tasks, web browsing, and light productivity where only one or two threads are active, the 300T's higher base clock and lower power draw make it a plausible fit.
The Verdict
The recorded data draws a clear line between these two processors. The Intel Core i5-14401TE is the stronger processor for multithreaded work, with triple the cores and threads, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, 20 MB of L3 cache, ECC memory support, and UHD Graphics 730. The Intel Processor 300T is the lower-power option, with a 35 watt TDP, a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, a smaller 163 mm² die, and a recorded launch MSRP of $82.
A user selecting between these two should look at the workload profile. If the workload is heavily parallel or demands ECC memory, the i5-14401TE is the only choice between the two, because the 300T cannot offer ECC and has far fewer threads. If the workload is mostly single-threaded and power draw is the primary constraint, the 300T's higher base clock and lower TDP make it a reasonable pick. The i5-14401TE's 45 watt TDP is not extreme, but it is higher, and its 2.00 GHz base clock means it relies on boost behavior to reach its full speed, whereas the 300T runs at 3.40 GHz continuously.
The absence of direct benchmark scores in the database means that the performance relationship is defined entirely by specifications. The i5-14401TE has the structural advantages in core count, thread count, cache, boost clock, and ECC support. The 300T has the advantages in base clock, power draw, and launch MSRP. There is no recorded benchmark evidence that contradicts these specification-driven conclusions. Both processors are active products on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, so either can be dropped into a compatible desktop system. The choice hinges on whether the additional cores, cache, and ECC of the i5-14401TE justify its higher power draw, or whether the 300T's lower TDP and higher base clock serve a lighter workload profile better.