Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H Comparison

Intel Core i5-14401TE and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H occupy distinctly different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data reflects that split. The i5-14401TE is a desktop-oriented Raptor Lake Refresh part with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 9 386H is a mobile Panther Lake processor with 16 cores and 16 threads. The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements between them, but the Ultra 9 386H carries a full suite of scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks at all. This asymmetry shapes the analysis: the Ultra 9 386H can be interpreted against its nearest rivals, whereas the i5-14401TE can only be assessed through its specifications and market positioning.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H wins in every measurable performance category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20547 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, a strong indicator of high multi-threaded throughput. The i5-14401TE, by contrast, has no benchmark scores, so it cannot claim a single recorded victory in any workload. The data shows a clear use-case split: the Ultra 9 386H is designed for mobile computing with a 25 W TDP and a 3 nm process node, while the i5-14401TE targets desktop systems with a 45 W TDP and a 10 nm node. The Ultra 9 386H is the only option for users who need measured performance data, particularly in multi-core rendering, encryption, and mathematical workloads. The i5-14401TE, lacking any recorded scores, offers no empirical evidence of wins in any scenario.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use fundamentally different designs. The i5-14401TE is based on Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series, and uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. Its die size is listed as 215 mm². The Ultra 9 386H uses Panther Lake-H, part of the Core Ultra Series 3, and is built on a 3 nm process node, also by Intel. The process node difference is significant: 10 nm versus 3 nm suggests a much denser transistor layout for the newer part, though the database does not list transistor counts for either. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 9 386H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The thread count discrepancy indicates a different core architecture: the i5 uses hyper-threading (6 cores, 12 threads), while the Ultra 9 does not (16 cores, 16 threads), implying a higher physical core count with no simultaneous multi-threading. Cache structures also differ substantially. The i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 9 386H has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 9 has larger per-core caches but less total L3. Memory support diverges as well: the i5 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 9 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Ultra 9 also has a listed memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, a figure absent for the i5. ECC memory is supported on the i5 but not on the Ultra 9. The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the i5 versus Intel Xe3 Graphics on the Ultra 9. PCIe capabilities are similar in generation (Gen 5) but differ in lane count, with the i5 offering 16 lanes and the Ultra 9 offering 12 lanes. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 for the i5 and Intel BGA 2540 for the Ultra 9, the latter being a mobile soldered package.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmarks between the i5-14401TE and the Ultra 9 386H do not exist in the database. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the win counts are zero for both processors. This means no exact score comparisons can be drawn between the two. However, the Ultra 9 386H has a substantial set of standalone scores that can be interpreted against its nearest rivals. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Ultra 9 scores 20547, and in single-core it scores 2071.5. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 12820 and single-core is 1809. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 3223 and single-core is 303.5. Passmark results show a multithread score of 35399, a single-thread score of 4218, integer math at 87284, floating-point math at 108527, data compression at 352365, data encryption at 27150, extended instructions at 29138, find prime numbers at 341, physics at 3028, and random string sorting at 42135. The average benchmark score for the Ultra 9 is 43210. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with an average score of 43326 and a delta of -0.3 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 with 43431 and -0.5 percent, the Intel Core i9-12900 with 42906 and 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i9-12900KF with 42830 and 0.9 percent. These deltas indicate the Ultra 9 sits within one percent of all four rivals, showing tight competition at the top of its segment. The i5-14401TE has no such data, so its performance cannot be quantified or compared.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors are extensive. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 9 386H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close: 2.00 GHz for the i5 and 2.10 GHz for the Ultra 9. Boost clocks differ more: 4.50 GHz for the i5 and 4.90 GHz for the Ultra 9. TDP is a major differentiator: 45 W for the i5 and 25 W for the Ultra 9, making the mobile part significantly more power-efficient on paper. The sockets are different, with the i5 using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 9 using Intel BGA 2540. Process nodes differ: 10 nm for the i5 and 3 nm for the Ultra 9. Die size is listed only for the i5 at 215 mm², with no die size for the Ultra 9. Cache configurations vary: L1 is 80 KB per core for the i5 versus 192 KB per core for the Ultra 9; L2 is 1.25 MB per core versus 2.5 MB per core; L3 is 20 MB shared versus 18 MB shared. Memory support differs: the i5 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 9 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is listed only for the Ultra 9 at 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the i5 but not the Ultra 9. PCIe lane counts differ: 16 lanes for the i5 and 12 lanes for the Ultra 9, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 for the i5 and Intel Xe3 Graphics for the Ultra 9. Market segments differ: Desktop for the i5 and Mobile for the Ultra 9. Release dates differ: June 30, 2024 for the i5 and January 4, 2026 for the Ultra 9. The production status is Active for both. Neither has a launch MSRP listed. Both have locked multipliers. Part numbers are Q4T4SRNJP for the i5 and SA4R5Q9EH for the Ultra 9.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process node, while the Ultra 9 386H uses a 3 nm process node, both fabricated by Intel.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The i5-14401TE supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 9 386H does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 W, while the Ultra 9 386H has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Does the Ultra 9 386H have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: Yes, the Ultra 9 386H has scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple Passmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 43210. The i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Ultra 9 386H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 9 386H is within one percent of all four nearest rivals: it is 0.3 percent behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 0.5 percent behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 0.7 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900, and 0.9 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900KF.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one choice for users who require measured performance: the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. It has a complete benchmark profile, an 88th percentile ranking, and an average score of 43210, placing it in the upper tier of the database. Its 16 cores, 4.90 GHz boost clock, and 3 nm process node indicate a high-performance mobile part, and its 25 W TDP suggests efficiency. The i5-14401TE, with no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals, cannot be evaluated on performance from the database. It offers 6 cores, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, a 10 nm node, and a 45 W TDP, but without data, its capabilities remain unmeasured. The choice is clear for data-driven decisions: the Ultra 9 386H is the only processor with evidence of performance, and its scores against rivals show it is competitive at the top of its class. The i5-14401TE is a desktop part with a different feature set, including ECC support and DDR4 compatibility, but its lack of recorded benchmarks leaves its real-world performance unknown. Users seeking a mobile processor with validated multi-core and single-core results should select the Ultra 9 386H. Users needing a desktop processor with ECC and DDR4 support may consider the i5-14401TE, but they should be aware that no benchmark data exists to confirm its performance level.