Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts differ between the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Ultra 9 does not support Hyper-Threading, which results in a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 9 285HX operates at a base clock of 2.80 GHz and boosts to 5.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. The Core i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core Ultra 9 285HX supports only DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Core Ultra 9 285HX features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core i5-14401TE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX represent two distinct generations and design philosophies from Intel. The Core i5-14401TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The die size measures 215 mm². This processor is designed for the desktop segment and uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-HX codename. It uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This processor targets the mobile segment and uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket. The Ultra 9 has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Core i5-14401TE does not.

The core topology differs substantially. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores with 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading support. The Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores with 24 threads, meaning it does not use hyper-threading. Cache hierarchies also diverge: the Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 9 285HX has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs as well. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core Ultra 9 285HX supports only DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also varies: the Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics solutions are different generations, with the Core i5-14401TE using UHD Graphics 730 and the Core Ultra 9 285HX using Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for the Core Ultra 9 285HX shows a processor with substantial multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, so the comparison relies entirely on the Ultra 9's scores and its nearest rival positions.

In Cinebench R15, the Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 5,656.5 in multi-core and 323.5 in single-core. The R20 run shows 20,236 multi-core and 2,856 single-core. The R23 test yields 36,429.5 multi-core and 2,187.5 single-core. These scores place the Ultra 9 in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The multi-core figures indicate a processor designed for heavy parallel workloads, while the single-core scores show strong per-thread performance.

PassMark results reinforce this profile. The multi-thread score is 56,902, and the single-thread score is 4,618. Integer math scores 155,076, floating point math scores 194,998, and extended instructions score 49,148. Data compression scores 631,885, data encryption scores 48,567, and random string sorting scores 77,196. Physics scores 3,476, and find prime numbers scores 460.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Ultra 9's aggregate performance. Its average benchmark score is 76,155. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the Ultra 9. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76,492, a delta of -0.4 percent. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513, a delta of -0.5 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75,779, a delta of 0.5 percent. These deltas indicate that the Core Ultra 9 285HX sits within a narrow performance band around these four rivals, neither clearly ahead nor behind by a significant margin. The largest gap is 0.5 percent against the Ryzen 9 9950X3D, and the smallest is 0.1 percent against the Ryzen 9 8945HX.

Because the Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores in the database, direct head-to-head numbers cannot be presented. The available data shows that the Core Ultra 9 285HX delivers a high level of performance across both synthetic render tests and PassMark workloads, with a 95th percentile ranking. The Core i5-14401TE's 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the database distribution, but without recorded scores, its exact performance relative to the Ultra 9 cannot be quantified.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is the higher-performing processor. Its 95th percentile ranking, 24 cores, 5.50 GHz boost clock, and substantial cache sizes position it as a top-tier mobile part. The Core i5-14401TE, with a 50th percentile ranking, 6 cores, and a 4.50 GHz boost clock, sits in the middle of the performance distribution.

For workloads that scale with core count and thread parallelism, the Core Ultra 9 285HX is the clear choice. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,429.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,902 demonstrate strong throughput. The single-thread performance is also higher, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,187.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,618.

The Core i5-14401TE offers a lower TDP of 45 watts compared to the Ultra 9's 55 watts, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which may be relevant for platforms with existing DDR4 modules. It also uses the Socket 1700, a widely adopted desktop socket. The Ultra 9 uses the BGA 2114 mobile socket, which is not user-upgradable in the same manner.

Users building a desktop system with an upgrade path and memory flexibility should consider the Core i5-14401TE. Users prioritizing maximum compute performance in a mobile form factor should choose the Core Ultra 9 285HX. The benchmark data does not record any wins for the Core i5-14401TE, as it has no scores, while the Core Ultra 9 285HX carries all recorded performance results.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX:

• Series: Core 14th Gen versus Core Ultra Series 2
• Cores: 6 versus 24
• Threads: 12 versus 24
• Base Clock: 2.00 GHz versus 2.80 GHz
• Boost Clock: 4.50 GHz versus 5.50 GHz
• TDP: 45 watts versus 55 watts
• Socket: Intel Socket 1700 versus Intel BGA 2114
• Architecture: Raptor Lake versus Arrow Lake
• Codename: Raptor Lake-R versus Arrow Lake-HX
• Generation: Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) versus Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake-HX)
• Process Node: 10 nm versus 3 nm
• Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
• Transistors: not listed versus 17,800 million
• Die Size: 215 mm² versus 243 mm²
• L1 Cache: 80 KB (per core) versus 192 KB (per core)
• L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (per core) versus 3 MB (per core)
• L3 Cache: 20 MB (shared) versus 36 MB (shared)
• Memory Support: DDR4, DDR5 versus DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: not listed versus 102.4 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) versus Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: UHD Graphics 730 versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
• Market Segment: Desktop versus Mobile
• Release Date: June 30, 2024 versus January 12, 2025
• Multiplier Unlocked: false versus true
• Part Number: Q4T4SRNJP versus SRVFJ
• Percentile vs All CPUs: 50 versus 95
• Average Benchmark Score: 0 versus 76,155