Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data places the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T in a firmly dominant position over the Intel Core i5-14401TE, though the comparison is limited by the fact that the database contains no benchmark scores for the i5-14401TE. The Ultra 7 265T carries an average benchmark score of 47,697 across all recorded tests, while the i5-14401TE holds an average of 0, meaning every measurable performance category in this database belongs to the Ultra 7 265T by default.

Examining the Ultra 7 265T’s Cinebench results reveals a substantial performance envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 31,558, while the single-core score lands at 4,455. The R20 run shows 13,254 multicore and 1,871 single-core, and the R15 test records 3,180 multicore with 449 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that scales well with thread count, which aligns with its 20-core, 20-thread configuration.

PassMark results for the Ultra 7 265T further illustrate its strengths. The multithread score is 37,084, with integer math at 104,943 and floating-point math at 129,817. Data compression reaches 370,158, while data encryption scores 29,687. Extended instructions hit 28,609, and random string sorting finishes at 44,400. The physics test records 2,391, and the single-thread PassMark score sits at 4,338. Prime number finding is comparatively modest at 322, which suggests that the core architecture prioritizes throughput over specialized integer workloads.

The percentile ranking reinforces the Ultra 7 265T’s position. It sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the i5-14401TE rests at the 50th percentile. That 40-percentile gap places the two processors in entirely different performance tiers, with the Ultra 7 265T clearly aimed at demanding desktop workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14401TE offers no recorded benchmark wins, so the use-case split is one-sided in the data. For applications that leverage high core counts, the Ultra 7 265T’s 20 cores and 20 threads provide the foundation for its strong multicore scores. The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 31,558, for instance, indicates serious rendering and compilation capability. The PassMark multithread score of 37,084 confirms that parallel workloads see clear benefits.

Single-threaded performance is also favorable to the Ultra 7 265T. Its boost clock of 5.30 GHz, the highest figure in the comparison, supports the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,455 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,338. Tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and lightly threaded applications should respond well to that clock speed.

The i5-14401TE, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot claim victory in any measured category. Its 6 cores and 12 threads suggest a more modest workload ceiling, and its base clock of 2.00 GHz with a 4.50 GHz boost places it below the Ultra 7 265T in raw frequency headroom. The data implies that the i5-14401TE is positioned for basic desktop tasks, while the Ultra 7 265T targets heavier processing loads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing approaches. The i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its die size measures 215 mm². The Ultra 7 265T employs Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-S, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process, with a die size of 243 mm² and a transistor count of 17,800 million.

Core configurations diverge sharply. The i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 265T offers 20 cores and 20 threads. That difference explains the multicore performance gap. Cache hierarchies also differ: the i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 265T doubles L1 to 192 KB per core, raises L2 to 3 MB per core, and expands L3 to 30 MB shared.

Memory support reflects the generational split. The i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while the Ultra 7 265T supports only DDR5. The Ultra 7 265T lists a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure absent for the i5-14401TE. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14401TE but not on the Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 7 265T offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics vary as well: UHD Graphics 730 on the i5-14401TE versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU on the Ultra 7 265T. Sockets are incompatible, with the i5-14401TE using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 7 265T using Intel Socket 1851. Power envelopes differ, with the i5-14401TE rated at 45 W TDP and the Ultra 7 265T at 35 W, despite the latter’s higher core count.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the Ultra 7 265T reaches 5.30 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5. The i5-14401TE also supports DDR4, while the Ultra 7 265T supports only DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher L3 cache?

A: The Ultra 7 265T has 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The i5-14401TE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The Ultra 7 265T uses a 3 nm process by TSMC.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Ultra 7 265T does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14401TE | Intel Core Ultra 7 265T |

|----------------|----------------------|--------------------------|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 6 | 20 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $384 |

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T outperforms the Intel Core i5-14401TE in every recorded metric, with its average benchmark score of 47,697 and 90th percentile ranking standing against the i5-14401TE’s zero recorded scores and 50th percentile placement. The Ultra 7 265T’s 20 cores, 20 threads, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 30 MB L3 cache provide the structural basis for its dominance in both multicore and single-core tests.

The i5-14401TE serves a different role. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 45 W TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5, indicate a processor aimed at conventional desktop builds where power efficiency and memory flexibility matter more than raw throughput. Its ECC memory support adds reliability appeal for specific workstation scenarios. However, the absence of benchmark scores in the database means no performance claims can be substantiated for it.

For users prioritizing processing power, the Ultra 7 265T is the only choice supported by data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,558 and PassMark multithread score of 37,084 demonstrate strong parallel performance. The single-core scores of 4,455 in R23 and 4,338 in PassMark show that it does not sacrifice responsiveness for core count. The 3 nm TSMC process and 35 W TDP suggest efficiency gains over the older 10 nm design, though the database does not provide direct power consumption measurements.

The i5-14401TE remains an option for those who need a desktop processor with ECC support, DDR4 compatibility, and a lower core count. Its 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the database’s CPU distribution, adequate for standard computing tasks. Yet the data gives no reason to prefer it over the Ultra 7 265T on performance grounds. The verdict from the measurements is straightforward: the Ultra 7 265T is the higher-performing processor, and the i5-14401TE targets a more modest segment of the desktop market.