Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and the Intel Core i5-14401TE occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, and the benchmark data confirms a substantial performance gap between them. The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for the i5-14401TE, meaning all quantitative comparisons rely on the Ultra 7 265KF's measured results and its position relative to other processors in the database. The i5-14401TE holds a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Ultra 7 265KF sits at the 94th percentile, a difference that places them in entirely different performance classes.

The Ultra 7 265KF delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736, which is a strong result for heavily threaded workloads. Its single-core score of 7021 in the same test indicates excellent per-thread performance as well. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 20889, while the single-core result is 2948. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 5013 multi-core and 707 single-core scores. These results show consistent scaling across different Cinebench versions, with the Ultra 7 265KF maintaining a roughly 7:1 ratio between multi-core and single-core performance in each iteration.

Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with the Ultra 7 265KF scoring 22913 in multi-core and 2759 in single-core. The Passmark suite provides additional detail on specialized workloads. The multithread score is 58518, while the single-thread score is 4928. Integer math achieves 143351, floating point math reaches 189431, and extended instructions score 54513. Data compression scores 666589, data encryption scores 48198, and random string sorting scores 79735. Physics processing scores 3633, and the find prime numbers test scores 486. These numbers establish the Ultra 7 265KF as a capable processor across a wide range of compute tasks.

The i5-14401TE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its raw performance cannot be quantified here. Its specification profile suggests it targets a different market segment. The average benchmark score for the Ultra 7 265KF is 71910, which places it in close competition with several server-class processors in the database. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX with an average score of 71797, a delta of 0.2 percent. The Intel Xeon 6517P scores 72350, putting the Ultra 7 265KF 0.6 percent behind it. The Intel Xeon 6724P scores 72396, 0.7 percent ahead of the Ultra 7 265KF. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71370, which the Ultra 7 265KF leads by 0.8 percent. These margins are narrow, indicating that the Ultra 7 265KF trades blows with high-end server processors in aggregate benchmark performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Ultra 7 265KF wins decisively in every measured performance category, but the nature of its advantages varies by workload. In multi-threaded applications, its 20 cores and 20 threads provide massive parallelism. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 reflects this strength, and the Passmark multithread score of 58518 confirms it. For content creation workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and batch image processing, the Ultra 7 265KF's thread count and clock speeds position it as the stronger choice. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz gives it a substantial advantage in lightly threaded tasks as well, as shown by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2759.

The i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores in the database, so its performance advantages cannot be demonstrated quantitatively. Its 45 W TDP, however, indicates a much lower power envelope than the Ultra 7 265KF's 125 W TDP. This makes the i5-14401TE suitable for systems where power consumption and thermal output are primary concerns. The lower TDP also implies that it can be cooled with less substantial cooling hardware, which may matter for compact desktop builds. The i5-14401TE also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, giving system builders the option to reuse existing DDR4 memory modules. The Ultra 7 265KF supports DDR5 only. The i5-14401TE includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 730, while the Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics at all. For systems that will not use a discrete graphics card, the i5-14401TE can operate without additional hardware, whereas the Ultra 7 265KF requires a separate GPU.

The Ultra 7 265KF's ECC memory support is listed as false, while the i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. This matters for users who require error-correcting memory for data integrity in scientific computing or server applications. The i5-14401TE also uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is widely available and compatible with a large ecosystem of motherboards. The Ultra 7 265KF uses the newer Intel Socket 1851 platform, which requires a newer motherboard generation.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is the significantly faster processor. Its 94th percentile ranking versus the i5-14401TE's 50th percentile ranking shows a gap of 44 percentile points. The Ultra 7 265KF delivers strong multi-core and single-core scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 71910. Users who need maximum processing throughput for demanding applications should choose the Ultra 7 265KF based on this data.

The i5-14401TE, despite having no recorded benchmark scores, offers attributes that may suit specific use cases. Its 45 W TDP makes it a low-power option, and its ECC memory support and integrated graphics add functionality that the Ultra 7 265KF lacks. The i5-14401TE supports DDR4 memory, which can lower system cost for builders who already own DDR4 modules. Its Socket 1700 platform is mature and well supported.

The choice between these two processors depends on whether raw performance or platform flexibility matters more. The Ultra 7 265KF is the clear performance leader, while the i5-14401TE offers features that the Ultra 7 265KF does not provide. The Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the i5-14401TE's multiplier is locked. The Ultra 7 265KF also has a launch MSRP of $379, a detail recorded in the database for reference.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF than the Intel Core i5-14401TE?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the i5-14401TE, so a direct performance delta cannot be calculated. The Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910 and a 94th percentile ranking, while the i5-14401TE has a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF does not support ECC memory.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Ultra 7 265KF lists integrated graphics as N/A, meaning a discrete graphics card is required. The i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Ultra 7 265KF supports DDR5 memory only, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads.

Q: How do the Ultra 7 265KF's benchmark scores compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 7 265KF's average score of 71910 is 0.2 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.6 percent behind the Intel Xeon 6517P, 0.7 percent behind the Intel Xeon 6724P, and 0.8 percent ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The die size is 215 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, belonging to the Core Ultra Series 2. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² and 17,800 million transistors.

The cache hierarchies differ substantially. The i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 265KF has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. These larger caches on the Ultra 7 265KF contribute to its higher benchmark performance.

The memory support differs as well. The i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Ultra 7 265KF supports DDR5 memory only, also in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14401TE but absent on the Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The i5-14401TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 265KF supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 265KF thus offers additional PCIe lanes for expansion devices.

The integrated graphics situation is a notable architectural difference. The i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics. This makes the i5-14401TE self-sufficient for basic display output, whereas the Ultra 7 265KF requires a discrete graphics card for any video output.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show clear differences between the two processors. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads. The i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Ultra 7 265KF has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

The TDP differs significantly. The i5-14401TE is rated at 45 W, while the Ultra 7 265KF is rated at 125 W. This indicates a much higher power draw for the Ultra 7 265KF, which aligns with its higher core count and clock speeds.

The sockets are different. The i5-14401TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 265KF uses Intel Socket 1851. These sockets are not interchangeable, requiring different motherboard platforms.

The process nodes differ. The i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the Ultra 7 265KF uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The foundry also differs: Intel for the i5-14401TE and TSMC for the Ultra 7 265KF.

The multiplier unlock status differs. The i5-14401TE has a locked multiplier, while the Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking on supported motherboards.

The release dates differ. The i5-14401TE was released on June 30, 2024, while the Ultra 7 265KF was released on October 23, 2024. The production status for both is listed as active.

The market segment for both is Desktop. The i5-14401TE has a part number of Q4T4SRNJP, while the Ultra 7 265KF has a part number of SRQCU. The Ultra 7 265KF has a launch MSRP of $379, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14401TE.