Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 occupy very different positions in the database. The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Core Ultra 7 265 has extensive data across multiple test suites. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided in terms of available data, but the specifications and the Ultra 7's performance profile still provide a clear picture.

The Core Ultra 7 265 delivers strong multi-threaded results. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 42,216 points. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result is 6,268, and the R15 multi-core score is 4,255. These figures indicate a processor capable of handling heavily parallel workloads with substantial throughput. The single-core results are equally notable: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 5,960, R20 single-core scores 884, and R15 single-core scores 600. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz supports these high single-thread figures.

PassMark tests confirm the pattern. The multi-thread score is 49,682, while the single-thread score sits at 4,689. Integer math scores 134,773, floating point math scores 172,776, and extended instructions score 41,478. Data compression reaches 522,983, and data encryption reaches 40,456. Find prime numbers scores 418, random string sorting scores 63,833, and physics scores 2,923.

The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile rank is 50, placing it at the median of all CPUs tracked. The Core Ultra 7 265 has a percentile rank of 93, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score for the Ultra 7 is 64,640.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 7 265 provide context. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, which is 0.3% lower than the Ultra 7. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104, which is 0.7% lower. These deltas are small, indicating the Ultra 7 sits in a tightly contested performance band among high-end server and desktop parts.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy between these two processors. The Core Ultra 7 265 is the superior performer by a wide margin in every workload category where data exists. Its multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (42,216) and PassMark multi-thread (49,682) reflect a processor designed for heavy compute tasks. Its single-core results, such as the 5,960 in Cinebench R23, also exceed what the Core i5-14401TE can plausibly deliver given its lower boost clock of 4.50 GHz and fewer cores.

The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark data. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz, suggest a modest mainstream desktop part. The 45 W TDP indicates a power-conscious design. The Core Ultra 7 265, with 20 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, is a high-end desktop processor. Its 65 W TDP is higher but still reasonable for the performance on offer.

For users selecting between these two, the data points to the Core Ultra 7 265 for any workload that benefits from high core counts or high clock speeds. The Core i5-14401TE would only be appropriate for scenarios where the lower TDP and older platform are mandatory constraints.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Core Ultra 7 265 wins in every benchmark category. Multi-threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and scientific simulations will see substantial gains from the 20-core configuration. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 demonstrates this capability. Single-threaded tasks, including many games and legacy applications, also favor the Ultra 7 due to its 5.30 GHz boost clock and higher per-core cache allocation.

The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark wins in the database. Its strengths lie in its specification profile rather than measured performance. The 45 W TDP makes it a lower-power option, which can be relevant for thermally constrained systems. Its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in system building. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 offers basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The Core Ultra 7 265 uses DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, compared to the Core i5-14401TE's 16 lanes. This gives the Ultra 7 more headroom for high-speed storage and expansion cards.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 boosts to 5.30 GHz. The Core i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do their Cinebench R23 multi-core scores compare?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 scores 42,216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded score in the database.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has a percentile rank of 93. The Core i5-14401TE has a percentile rank of 50.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Core i5-14401TE uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The die size is 215 mm². The Core Ultra 7 265 uses Arrow Lake architecture, with the Arrow Lake-S codename, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. The die size is 243 mm², and the transistor count is 17,800 million.

The cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 265 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Ultra 7 contribute to its higher single-thread performance.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU. The latter is a more modern GPU architecture. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 7 265 supports only DDR5. The PCIe configuration also differs: the Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 7 265 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Specification Differences

The core counts are a major differentiator. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for the Core i5-14401TE and 2.40 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 265. The boost clock is 4.50 GHz versus 5.30 GHz.

The TDP ratings are 45 W for the Core i5-14401TE and 65 W for the Core Ultra 7 265. The sockets differ: the Core i5-14401TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses Intel Socket 1851. The process node is 10 nm for the older part and 3 nm for the newer one. The foundry is Intel for the Core i5-14401TE and TSMC for the Core Ultra 7 265.

The memory support is another point of divergence. The Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bus. The Core Ultra 7 265 supports only DDR5 with dual-channel bus and a stated memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the Core i5-14401TE but not on the Core Ultra 7 265. The PCIe lanes from the CPU are 16 for the Core i5-14401TE and 20 for the Core Ultra 7 265. The release dates also differ: the Core i5-14401TE launched on 2024-06-30, and the Core Ultra 7 265 launched on 2025-01-06. The Core Ultra 7 265 has a launch MSRP of $394. The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.