Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. However, the available data for the Core Ultra 7 258V can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline.

The Core Ultra 7 258V achieves an average benchmark score of 20454. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, posts an average score of 20468, placing the Core Ultra 7 258V just 0.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425, which is 0.1% behind the Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20422, a 0.2% deficit, and the AMD EPYC 7713 scores 20363, a 0.4% deficit. These margins are exceptionally tight, indicating that the Core Ultra 7 258V sits in a performance band nearly identical to these established desktop and server processors.

Looking at the Core Ultra 7 258V's individual benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10301 and single-core score of 1872 show a strong balance. The Geekbench multicore score of 9325 and single-core score of 2100 reinforce this pattern. In PassMark tests, the multithread score of 18887 and single-thread score of 4018 demonstrate consistent throughput. The integer math score of 42889 and floating point math score of 57372 indicate solid computational capability across both integer and floating-point workloads.

The data compression score of 176686 and data encryption score of 13534 show the processor handles these specialized tasks effectively. The extended instructions score of 14717 and random string sorting score of 21580 round out the suite. The find prime numbers score of 185 and physics score of 1565 are comparatively lower, but these represent specific workload types.

Since the Core i5-14401TE lacks recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured performance deltas. The percentile ranking provides additional context: the Core Ultra 7 258V sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile. This suggests that in the broader database distribution, the Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms a majority of processors, while the Core i5-14401TE sits closer to the median.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies within Intel's lineup. The Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and is categorized as a desktop processor. The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and is categorized as a mobile processor.

The core configurations differ significantly. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating hyperthreading support. The Core Ultra 7 258V has 8 cores but only 8 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading. The Core Ultra 7 258V has more physical cores but fewer threads overall. The base clock of the Core Ultra 7 258V is 2.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the Core i5-14401TE, and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, giving the Core Ultra 7 258V a clock speed advantage at both ends.

The cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 258V has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 258V has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, while the Core i5-14401TE has a larger shared L3 cache.

Memory support diverges as well. The Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. The Core Ultra 7 258V supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, but it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 7 258V provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ notably. The Core i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 258V uses Arc 140V. The thermal design power (TDP) shows a major gap: the Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 7 258V has a TDP of 17 watts. The sockets are incompatible, with the Core i5-14401TE using Intel Socket 1700 and the Core Ultra 7 258V using Intel BGA 2833. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 258V demonstrates clear strengths in several areas based on its benchmark data. Its 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. The nearest rival comparisons show it essentially matches the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, a well-regarded desktop processor, with only a 0.1% difference. This suggests the Core Ultra 7 258V delivers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor.

The Core Ultra 7 258V also wins on efficiency. Its 17 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the 45 watt TDP of the Core i5-14401TE. For mobile applications, this represents a substantial advantage in battery life and thermal management. The 3 nm process node from TSMC versus the 10 nm node from Intel further reinforces the efficiency advantage, as smaller process nodes typically deliver better performance per watt.

The Core Ultra 7 258V also holds advantages in per-core resources. Its larger L1 cache of 192 KB per core and L2 cache of 2.5 MB per core provide more local data storage, which can benefit single-threaded workloads. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz gives it an edge in burst performance scenarios. The Arc 140V integrated graphics is likely more capable than the UHD Graphics 730 for graphics-intensive tasks, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Core i5-14401TE wins on core and thread count in terms of multithreading capability. With 12 threads versus 8, it can handle more concurrent threads, which benefits heavily threaded workloads like video rendering or scientific computing. The larger shared L3 cache of 20 MB versus 12 MB provides more aggregate cache for data shared across cores. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes versus 4 lanes gives it significantly more expansion bandwidth for discrete GPUs, NVMe storage, or other peripherals. ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-sensitive computing environments.

The Core i5-14401TE also wins on memory flexibility. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows users to choose between established and newer memory technologies, while the Core Ultra 7 258V is limited to LPDDR5X. The desktop form factor with Socket 1700 enables upgrades and custom cooling, whereas the BGA 2833 socket is soldered directly to the motherboard.

The Verdict

The data indicates two processors designed for entirely different market segments. The Core Ultra 7 258V is a mobile processor with strong single-threaded and multicore performance, evidenced by its 74th percentile ranking and benchmark scores that nearly match the AMD Ryzen 5 5600. Its 17 watt TDP and 3 nm process node make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where efficiency is paramount.

The Core i5-14401TE is a desktop processor with a 45 watt TDP, 6 cores, 12 threads, and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC. Its 50th percentile ranking places it near the median of all CPUs, and its lack of recorded benchmarks means its performance profile is defined by specifications rather than measurements.

Users requiring maximum thread count, ECC memory, PCIe expansion, or memory flexibility should select the Core i5-14401TE. Users prioritizing efficiency, per-core performance, higher clock speeds, or a smaller physical footprint should select the Core Ultra 7 258V. The 0.1% delta to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 suggests the Core Ultra 7 258V delivers competitive desktop-level performance despite its mobile designation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the two processors compare in the database percentile rankings?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ranks at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 12 threads from 6 cores. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has 8 threads from 8 cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a TDP of 17 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14401TE | Intel Core Ultra 7 258V |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 watts | 17 watts |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 136.5 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc 140V |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-09-23 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 74 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 20454 |