Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 238V Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 238V has 8 cores and 8 threads. The Ultra 5 uses a thread count equal to its core count, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core Ultra 5 238V boosts to 4.70 GHz, which is higher than the Core i5-14401TE's 4.50 GHz boost. Their base clocks are close, at 2.10 GHz for the Ultra 5 and 2.00 GHz for the i5.

Q: How do the two processors differ in thermal design power?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 238V has a TDP of 17 watts. The Ultra 5 is designed for a significantly lower power envelope.

Q: What manufacturing processes are used for each processor?

A: The Core i5-14401TE uses Intel's 10 nm process node, while the Core Ultra 5 238V uses TSMC's 3 nm process node. The die size for the i5 is 215 mm², while the Ultra 5's die size is not recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 238V does not support ECC memory, and its memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions in these two chips?

A: The Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 238V includes Arc 130V. Both are integrated solutions, but they belong to different graphics generations.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural approaches from Intel. The Core i5-14401TE is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 238V is based on the Lunar Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, and uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. This process difference is substantial, indicating a generational leap in manufacturing technology.

The core configurations differ fundamentally. The i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads, relying on hyperthreading to double its thread count. The Ultra 5 238V offers 8 cores and 8 threads, with no hyperthreading. The cache hierarchies also diverge. The i5 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 5 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and a smaller 8 MB of shared L3. The per-core cache allocations are larger on the Ultra 5, but the total shared L3 is much larger on the i5.

The memory and connectivity features show further differences. The i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra 5's memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The i5 provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, whereas the Ultra 5 provides only 4 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. ECC memory is supported on the i5 but not on the Ultra 5. The market segments differ as well: the i5 is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2833. The i5 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Ultra 5 has a TDP of 17 watts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records benchmark results for the Core Ultra 5 238V, while no benchmark scores are listed for the Core i5-14401TE. This limits direct comparison, but the available data for the Ultra 5 provides a picture of its performance standing.

In Cinebench R15, the Ultra 5 scores 1576 in multi-core and 222 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 6570 multi-core and 927 single-core. The R23 results show 15645 multi-core and 2208 single-core. These scores indicate a strong balance between single-thread and multi-thread workloads, with the single-core score in R23 reaching 2208.

PassMark results for the Ultra 5 cover several specific workloads. Data compression scores 176532, while data encryption scores 13072. Extended instructions score 15377, and finding prime numbers scores 174. Floating point math scores 53160, integer math scores 38889, and multithread scores 18407. Physics testing scores 1546, random string sorting scores 21585, and single-thread testing scores 3890.

The Ultra 5's average benchmark score is 21981, placing it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11700F with an average score of 21988 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X with 21992 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V with 21952 and a delta of 0.1 percent, and the AMD EPYC 9534 with 21900 and a delta of 0.4 percent. The deltas are minimal, meaning the Ultra 5 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. It trails the i7-11700F and Ryzen 5 3600X by a negligible margin, effectively matching them. It leads the Core Ultra 5 236V by 0.1 percent and the EPYC 9534 by 0.4 percent.

Because the i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks in the database, head-to-head wins cannot be calculated. The wins counters for both processors stand at zero. The absence of data for the i5 means that any performance comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct measurements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 238V has 8 cores and 8 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for the i5 and 2.10 GHz for the Ultra 5. The boost clock is 4.50 GHz for the i5 and 4.70 GHz for the Ultra 5. The TDP is 45 watts for the i5 and 17 watts for the Ultra 5.

The socket types are different: the i5 uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 uses Intel BGA 2833. The architectures are Raptor Lake for the i5 and Lunar Lake for the Ultra 5. The process nodes are 10 nm for the i5 and 3 nm for the Ultra 5, with different foundries (Intel versus TSMC). The die size is 215 mm² for the i5, with no die size recorded for the Ultra 5.

Cache specifications differ in all levels. The i5 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The Ultra 5 has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the i5 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5's support depends on the motherboard. ECC memory is available on the i5 but not on the Ultra 5. PCIe lanes differ, with the i5 providing 16 Gen 5 lanes and the Ultra 5 providing 4 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the i5 and Arc 130V on the Ultra 5. The market segments are Desktop for the i5 and Mobile for the Ultra 5. Release dates differ, with the i5 released in June 2024 and the Ultra 5 in September 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 238V demonstrates clear strengths in the recorded benchmark data. Its 75th percentile standing among all CPUs places it above the i5-14401TE, which sits at the 50th percentile. The Ultra 5's average benchmark score of 21981 confirms its competitive position against established desktop processors like the Core i7-11700F and the Ryzen 5 3600X, both of which it nearly matches. The single-thread score of 3890 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance, which is valuable for lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2208 supports this, showing that the Lunar Lake architecture delivers high single-thread capability.

The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified from measurements. However, its specification profile suggests advantages in specific contexts. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache is substantially larger than the Ultra 5's 8 MB, which can benefit workloads that rely on large cached datasets. The 12 threads versus the Ultra 5's 8 threads mean the i5 can handle more concurrent threads, even with fewer physical cores. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in platform configuration. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer more connectivity headroom for expansion devices compared to the Ultra 5's 4 lanes. ECC memory support makes the i5 suitable for error-sensitive computing environments.

The power envelope favors the Ultra 5 in mobile or low-power scenarios. Its 17 watt TDP, compared to the i5's 45 watts, indicates substantially lower power consumption. The 3 nm process node from TSMC suggests a more modern manufacturing technology that contributes to efficiency.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V is the higher-performing processor in terms of recorded benchmark results. Its average benchmark score of 21981 places it at the 75th percentile, while the Core i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded scores. The Ultra 5's performance is closely matched with the Core i7-11700F and the Ryzen 5 3600X, which are established desktop parts. For users who prioritize measured performance, the Ultra 5 is the clear choice based on the database.

The Core i5-14401TE offers advantages in specific areas that are not captured by benchmark scores. Its larger shared L3 cache, higher thread count, ECC memory support, and greater PCIe lane availability make it suitable for desktop workloads that require these features. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 adds platform flexibility. The 45 watt TDP is higher than the Ultra 5's 17 watts, which reflects its desktop orientation.

The choice between the two depends on the use case. The Ultra 5 is designed for mobile systems with a BGA socket and low power draw, making it appropriate for laptops and compact devices. Its performance data shows it can handle demanding tasks despite its efficiency focus. The i5-14401TE is a desktop processor on Socket 1700, offering a different set of trade-offs with more threads and cache but a larger power footprint.

The absence of benchmarks for the i5-14401TE in the database prevents a direct performance ranking. The recorded data for the Ultra 5, however, confirms a capable processor that competes with older desktop chips. Users requiring ECC memory, extensive PCIe connectivity, or large L3 cache should consider the i5. Users seeking a modern, efficient processor with proven benchmark results should look to the Ultra 5.