Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no head-to-head comparison results for the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235. The Core Ultra 5 235 carries a full set of recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores, while the Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for specific tests.

However, the available data for the Core Ultra 5 235 places it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors. Its average benchmark score of 46062 puts it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, a 0.1% difference in the opposite direction. The AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 score 45970 and 45960 respectively, both 0.2% behind. These four rivals sit within a narrow 138-point band around the Ultra 5, indicating that the Ultra 5 trades blows with top-tier laptop and server chips.

Looking at the Core Ultra 5 235's individual Cinebench results, the multicore performance is substantial. Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 14769 points, while single-core reaches 2085. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 6202 and single-core is 875. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1488 multicore and 210 single-core. These scores indicate strong scaling from the 14 cores, with the single-core figures showing excellent per-thread efficiency from the 5.00 GHz boost clock.

The PassMark data for the Core Ultra 5 235 reveals specific strengths. The data compression test scores 390711, which is exceptionally high. Integer math scores 87948, floating point math scores 117951, and extended instructions score 32752. The multithread score of 37816 confirms heavy parallel workloads benefit greatly. Single-thread performance in PassMark scores 4516, which is competitive for modern desktop parts. The physics test scores 2570, while random string sorting scores 48980 and find prime numbers scores 371. Data encryption scores 29293.

The Core i5-14401TE, by contrast, has no recorded scores in either Cinebench or PassMark. The database shows zero benchmark entries, zero wins in hypothetical head-to-head comparisons, and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a default placement, not derived from actual test results. Without measured data, the only conclusions available come from the architectural specifications listed in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 as the stronger performer in every measurable category. Its 89th percentile ranking and average score of 46062 demonstrate that it competes with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core i9-13900HX, both of which sit within 0.1% of its average score. The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark data, so no performance claims can be made from measurements.

For builders who prioritize measured performance, the Core Ultra 5 235 is the clear choice based on the database. It offers 14 cores and 14 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14769 shows it handles heavily threaded workloads. The 65 TDP rating indicates a higher power envelope, but the performance data justifies it.

The Core i5-14401TE appeals to a different constraint. Its 45 TDP rating is lower, and it supports DDR4 memory, which can be a practical advantage for platforms with existing DDR4 modules. The 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.50 GHz boost clock place it in a more modest performance class, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm its actual capabilities. Buyers needing an energy-conscious desktop chip with ECC memory support might consider it, but they must accept that no measured performance data exists in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use fundamentally different designs. The Core i5-14401TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 235 belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC.

The transistor counts differ dramatically. The Core Ultra 5 235 has 17,800 million transistors, while the database lists no transistor count for the Core i5-14401TE. The die sizes also differ: the Core i5-14401TE measures 215 mm², while the Core Ultra 5 235 measures 243 mm². Despite the larger die, the Ultra 5 uses a much smaller process node, which explains the higher transistor density.

Core and thread counts show a major divergence. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating hyperthreading support. The Core Ultra 5 235 has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading. The Ultra 5 compensates with raw core count, offering more than double the physical cores.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 235 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 has larger per-core caches and a larger L3 pool.

Memory support diverges. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 235 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Ultra 5 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14401TE has no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support differs as well: the i5-14401TE supports ECC memory, the Ultra 5 does not.

PCIe capabilities differ. The Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 235 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 5 has more PCIe lanes.

Integrated graphics differ significantly. The Core i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Core Ultra 5 235 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU, a newer and more capable GPU architecture.

The sockets are incompatible. The Core i5-14401TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 235 uses Intel Socket 1851. Processors are not interchangeable between these platforms.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support DDR4 memory?

A: No. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Core Ultra 5 235 supports only DDR5.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 235 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45. The Core Ultra 5 235 has a TDP of 65.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Core Ultra 5 235?

A: The launch MSRP is $257. The database lists no launch MSRP for the Core i5-14401TE.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 235 wins in every measured benchmark category present in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085 indicate strong performance for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 37816 and single-thread score of 4516 confirm this across a broader test suite. The data compression score of 390711 is particularly notable, suggesting the Ultra 5 handles archival and compression tasks exceptionally well. The floating point math score of 117951 and integer math score of 87948 show balanced arithmetic performance. The 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

The Core i5-14401TE cannot claim any benchmark wins because it has no recorded scores. Its advantages come from specifications rather than measurements. The 45 TDP rating is lower than the Ultra 5's 65 TDP, indicating a more power-efficient design for systems with thermal or power constraints. The DDR4 memory support allows builders to reuse existing DDR4 modules, potentially simplifying platform upgrades. ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads. The 20 MB of L3 cache is smaller than the Ultra 5's 24 MB, but the 12 threads from 6 cores with hyperthreading provide adequate multithreading for lighter tasks.

For use cases like basic desktop productivity, light media consumption, or low-power servers with ECC requirements, the Core i5-14401TE may serve adequately based on its specifications. For any workload where measured performance matters, including content creation, software compilation, data analysis, or gaming, the Core Ultra 5 235 is the only choice with data to support it.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification field.

Processor name: Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235.

Series: Core 14th Gen vs Core Ultra Series 2.

Cores: 6 vs 14.

Threads: 12 vs 14.

Base clock: 2.00 GHz vs 3.40 GHz.

Boost clock: 4.50 GHz vs 5.00 GHz.

TDP: 45 vs 65.

Socket: Intel Socket 1700 vs Intel Socket 1851.

Architecture: Raptor Lake vs Arrow Lake.

Codename: Raptor Lake-R vs Arrow Lake-S.

Process node: 10 nm vs 3 nm.

Foundry: Intel vs TSMC.

Transistors: Not listed vs 17,800 million.

Die size: 215 mm² vs 243 mm².

L1 cache: 80 KB per core vs 192 KB per core.

L2 cache: 1.25 MB per core vs 3 MB per core.

L3 cache: 20 MB shared vs 24 MB shared.

Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 vs DDR5 only.

Memory bandwidth: Not listed vs 102.4 GB/s.

ECC memory: Yes vs No.

PCIe: Gen 5, 16 lanes vs Gen 5, 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 730 vs Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU.

Release date: 2024-06-30 vs 2025-01-06.

Launch MSRP: Not listed vs $257.

Part number: Q4T4SRNJP vs SRQAS.

Percentile vs all CPUs: 50 vs 89.

Average benchmark score: 0 vs 46062.

Both processors have locked multipliers and active production status. Both are desktop market segments. Neither processor has a recorded nearest rival in the database for the Core i5-14401TE, while the Core Ultra 5 235 has four nearest rivals within 0.2% of its average score.