Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Comparison

Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

The Intel Core i5-14401TE and Intel Core Ultra 5 228V represent two completely different approaches to CPU design from the same manufacturer. The i5-14401TE is a 14th Gen desktop part built on Raptor Lake, while the Ultra 5 228V is a Lunar Lake mobile chip built on a 3 nm process. The database shows the Ultra 5 228V sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, while the i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks and sits at the 50th percentile. The Ultra 5 228V carries an average benchmark score of 21440, placing it within 1% of chips like the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel Xeon D-1746TER, and AMD EPYC 9454. The i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries in the database, so all performance comparisons must rely on the Ultra 5 228V’s recorded results.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is the only one of these two chips with recorded benchmark data, and that data paints a clear picture of a capable mobile processor. Its average benchmark score of 21440 puts it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 at 21484 and the Intel Core i9-11900H at 21367, are essentially tied with it, with deltas of -0.2% and 0.3% respectively. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.9% ahead, while the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which is 1% behind.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores in the database, meaning no direct performance comparison can be made. Instead, the specification differences define the choice. The Ultra 5 228V uses a 3 nm TSMC process, has 8 cores and 8 threads, a 17 W TDP, and an Arc 130V integrated GPU. The i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm Intel process, has 6 cores and 12 threads, a 45 W TDP, and UHD Graphics 730. The Ultra 5 228V is a mobile chip with a BGA 2833 socket, while the i5-14401TE is a desktop chip for Socket 1700.

The data suggests the Ultra 5 228V is the chip for mobile workloads where efficiency and single-thread performance matter. The i5-14401TE, with its higher TDP and desktop socket, targets systems where the user supplies their own cooling and power delivery. For buyers who need a low-power mobile processor with proven benchmark results, the Ultra 5 228V is the clear pick. For desktop builders who need a 14th Gen Raptor Lake part with ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the i5-14401TE is the only option.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different foundries and process nodes. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses Intel’s 10 nm process and is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V uses TSMC’s 3 nm process and is built on the Lunar Lake architecture. This process difference is substantial: the 3 nm node allows far more transistors in a given area than the 10 nm node, which directly affects power efficiency and density.

The core configurations differ significantly. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, meaning it uses hyperthreading. The Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores and 8 threads, so each core handles one thread. The Ultra 5 228V has more physical cores, while the i5-14401TE has more logical threads. This changes how the two chips handle multithreaded workloads.

Cache layouts also diverge. The i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 228V has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 228V has more per-core cache at every level, but far less shared L3 cache.

The integrated graphics differ completely. The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, a basic desktop iGPU. The Ultra 5 228V uses Arc 130V, which is a much more capable integrated GPU. The Ultra 5 228V’s Arc 130V is designed for modern mobile graphics workloads, while the UHD Graphics 730 is a minimal display output solution.

Other architectural differences include PCIe support. The i5-14401TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 5 228V supports PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 lanes from the CPU. This reflects their different roles: desktop chips need many expansion lanes for GPUs and storage, while mobile chips are constrained by power and physical space.

Memory support also differs. The i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both dual-channel. The Ultra 5 228V’s memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard. ECC memory is supported by the i5-14401TE but not by the Ultra 5 228V. This makes the i5-14401TE suitable for error-corrected memory in workstation or server-like desktop builds.

The socket and market segment define their physical roles. The i5-14401TE uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part. The Ultra 5 228V uses Intel BGA 2833 and is a mobile part, meaning it is soldered directly to the board. The die size of the i5-14401TE is recorded as 215 mm², while the Ultra 5 228V’s die size is not recorded in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the two chips. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores at all, so there is no recorded performance data to compare against the Ultra 5 228V. All benchmark results in this comparison come from the Ultra 5 228V alone.

The Ultra 5 228V’s Cinebench results show its multithreaded and single-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1502.5 in multicore and 267 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 6491 in multicore and 916 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 9932 in multicore and 1758 in singlecore. These results show a processor that scales from older to newer test versions with consistent single-thread performance.

PassMark results for the Ultra 5 228V cover a wide range of workloads. Data compression scores 173924, data encryption scores 13032, and extended instructions score 14801. Find prime numbers scores 168, floating point math scores 53310, and integer math scores 39679. The multithread score is 18227, physics scores 1538, and random string sorting scores 21254. Single-thread performance scores 3836 in both the single_thread and singlethread entries.

The nearest rival comparisons place the Ultra 5 228V’s average score in context. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 21484, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.9% higher. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which is 1% lower. All four rivals are within one point of the Ultra 5 228V’s 21440 average score, showing that this mobile chip performs like a mid-range desktop processor from a previous generation.

Since the i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks, the database cannot show any wins for either chip. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. Any claim about which chip is faster in a specific test would require data that does not exist in the database.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ in nearly every specification category. The core count differs: the i5-14401TE has 6 cores, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores. The thread count differs in the opposite direction: the i5-14401TE has 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the i5-14401TE and 2.10 GHz for the Ultra 5 228V. Boost clocks are identical at 4.50 GHz for both.

The TDP differs by a wide margin. The i5-14401TE has a 45 W TDP, while the Ultra 5 228V has a 17 W TDP. This makes the Ultra 5 228V significantly more power-efficient on paper, a critical factor for mobile systems. The socket differs: Socket 1700 for the i5-14401TE, BGA 2833 for the Ultra 5 228V. The architecture differs: Raptor Lake for the i5-14401TE, Lunar Lake for the Ultra 5 228V. The codenames are Raptor Lake-R and Lunar Lake respectively.

The process node differs: 10 nm for the i5-14401TE, 3 nm for the Ultra 5 228V. The foundry differs: Intel for the i5-14401TE, TSMC for the Ultra 5 228V. The die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14401TE, with no recorded value for the Ultra 5 228V. Cache differs at every level: L1 is 80 KB per core for the i5-14401TE versus 192 KB per core for the Ultra 5 228V. L2 is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14401TE versus 2.5 MB per core for the Ultra 5 228V. L3 is 20 MB shared for the i5-14401TE versus 8 MB shared for the Ultra 5 228V.

Memory support differs: the i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 228V’s support depends on the motherboard. Both are dual-channel. ECC memory is supported by the i5-14401TE but not by the Ultra 5 228V. PCIe support differs: the i5-14401TE has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Ultra 5 228V has Gen 5 with 4 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 for the i5-14401TE, Arc 130V for the Ultra 5 228V.

Market segment differs: desktop for the i5-14401TE, mobile for the Ultra 5 228V. Release dates differ: the i5-14401TE launched on 2024-06-30, while the Ultra 5 228V launched on 2024-09-23. Both are active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Neither chip has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which chip has better multithreaded performance?

A: Only the Ultra 5 228V has recorded multithreaded performance. It scores 1502.5 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 6491 in Cinebench R20 multicore, 9932 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and 18227 in PassMark multithread. The i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks, so the database cannot compare their multithreaded performance.

Q: Which chip is more power-efficient?

A: The Ultra 5 228V has a 17 W TDP, while the i5-14401TE has a 45 W TDP. The Ultra 5 228V also uses a 3 nm TSMC process node, while the i5-14401TE uses Intel’s 10 nm process. The recorded data indicates the Ultra 5 228V requires less power.

Q: Does the i5-14401TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Ultra 5 228V does not support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics does each chip use?

A: The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Ultra 5 228V uses Arc 130V.

Q: Which chip has more PCIe lanes?

A: The i5-14401TE has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 5 228V has PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How does the Ultra 5 228V compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 5 228V has an average benchmark score of 21440. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 21484, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.9% higher. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which is 1% lower.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V wins in all recorded benchmark categories, simply because it is the only chip with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9932 and singlecore score of 1758 show solid performance for a mobile chip. PassMark results show strengths in data compression at 173924 and floating point math at 53310. The 75th percentile ranking and average score of 21440 place it among competent mid-range processors. The Ultra 5 228V also wins on power efficiency with its 17 W TDP and 3 nm process. Its 8 cores and larger per-core cache, 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2, give it an advantage in workloads that benefit from many physical cores. The Arc 130V integrated GPU is a significant advantage over the UHD Graphics 730 for any workload that uses the iGPU.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in no recorded benchmarks, but its specification sheet gives it clear advantages in specific use cases. It has 12 threads versus the Ultra 5 228V’s 8, which helps in heavily threaded desktop workloads. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache is more than double the Ultra 5 228V’s 8 MB, which helps with data reuse across cores. The i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving desktop builders flexibility in memory choice. ECC memory support makes it suitable for systems that need error correction. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes allows for multiple expansion cards and high-bandwidth GPUs. The 45 W TDP, while higher, indicates a chip designed for sustained desktop performance with an active cooler. The 215 mm² die size and Socket 1700 compatibility make it a drop-in part for existing desktop platforms. The i5-14401TE also launched earlier, on 2024-06-30, giving it more time in the market.

The data supports a simple split. The Ultra 5 228V is the choice for mobile systems, low-power builds, and any workload where the recorded benchmarks apply. The i5-14401TE is the choice for desktop systems that need ECC memory, many PCIe lanes, DDR4 or DDR5 support, and a 14th Gen Raptor Lake part. Without recorded benchmarks for the i5-14401TE, the database can only confirm the Ultra 5 228V’s performance, but the specification differences define two distinct roles that do not overlap.