Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The comparison between the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is heavily one-sided based on the recorded benchmark data. The Core Ultra 5 226V holds a decisive advantage across every measured workload, while the Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database to counter with. This means the head-to-head analysis relies entirely on the Core Ultra 5 226V's performance profile.

Starting with Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 9848 points in multi-core and 1744 points in single-core. These are strong numbers for a mobile processor. In Cinebench R20, it delivers 6381 multi-core and 900 single-core. The R15 results show 1501 multi-core and 267 single-core. The gap between the two processors cannot be quantified directly since the i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, but the Core Ultra 5 226V clearly establishes itself as the performer in this pairing.

Geekbench results reinforce the same pattern. The Core Ultra 5 226V records 8598 in multi-core and 1930 in single-core. These scores place it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, which is a solid position. The i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, meaning it has no validated performance data to compare. The percentile gap alone tells the story: the Core Ultra 5 226V is positioned well above the midpoint of the database, while the i5-14401TE has no measurable standing.

PassMark tests provide the most detailed look at the Core Ultra 5 226V's capabilities. Its multithread score is 17850, and its single-thread score is 3754. Integer math reaches 38647, while floating point math hits 52270. Data compression scores 170687, and data encryption reaches 12710. Extended instructions score 14724, random string sorting hits 20813, and find prime numbers scores 166. Physics processing records 1449. Every one of these numbers represents a data point that the i5-14401TE cannot match, simply because no such measurements exist for it.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 226V provide useful context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average score of 19364, which is essentially identical to the Core Ultra 5 226V's 19368, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19411, putting it 0.2 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19238, which is 0.7 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499, putting it 0.7 percent ahead. These tight deltas show that the Core Ultra 5 226V performs in the same class as these established desktop and mobile processors, despite its low power envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 226V wins every category where data exists. Its benchmark suite covers rendering, general processing, and specialized workloads. Cinebench scores confirm strong multi-threaded rendering capabilities for a mobile chip, while Geekbench indicates solid single-thread and multi-thread responsiveness for everyday applications. PassMark results show particular strength in data compression and floating point math, which are relevant for scientific workloads, financial modeling, and content creation tasks that rely on heavy arithmetic.

The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark wins in this comparison because the database contains zero recorded scores for it. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it would fall in the middle of the pack if tested, but without actual measurements, no workload-specific strengths can be identified. The processor does have architectural features that could matter in real-world use, such as support for ECC memory and a desktop socket, but these do not translate into benchmark victories.

The use-case split therefore favors the Core Ultra 5 226V across the board. For rendering, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9848 indicates it can handle substantial workloads despite its mobile classification. For general productivity, the Geekbench multi-core score of 8598 and single-core score of 1930 suggest smooth operation in office applications, web browsing, and media consumption. For specialized tasks like encryption or compression, the PassMark scores of 12710 and 170687 respectively show dedicated capability.

The i5-14401TE's case rests entirely on unmeasured potential. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, which is a traditional configuration for desktop workloads. Its 45 watt TDP is higher than the Core Ultra 5 226V's 17 watts, implying more sustained power draw and potentially different thermal characteristics. But without benchmark data, these specifications cannot be translated into performance claims.

The Verdict

The data points decisively toward the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V for any buyer who prioritizes measured performance. Its 73rd percentile standing versus the i5-14401TE's 50th percentile is a clear statistical gap. The Core Ultra 5 226V also carries a substantial average benchmark score of 19368, while the i5-14401TE has an average score of zero, meaning no validated results exist to support its case.

For mobile users, the Core Ultra 5 226V is the obvious choice. Its 17 watt TDP makes it suitable for thin and light systems, and its benchmark scores show it does not sacrifice performance for efficiency. The 8 cores and 8 threads configuration, combined with the 4.50 GHz boost clock, delivers competitive results in every recorded test. The integrated Arc 130V graphics also provides a more modern GPU solution compared to the UHD Graphics 730 in the i5-14401TE, though GPU benchmarks are not included in this data.

For desktop builders, the i5-14401TE offers a socketed platform with Intel Socket 1700, which allows for upgradeability and customization. It also supports ECC memory, a feature the Core Ultra 5 226V lacks. These are practical advantages for workstation or server-style builds. However, the absence of any benchmark scores means its actual performance cannot be verified against the Core Ultra 5 226V's recorded results. The verdict from the database is clear: the Core Ultra 5 226V is the only processor in this pairing with proven performance, and it wins on every measurable metric.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 5 226V has an average benchmark score of 19368. The Core i5-14401TE has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 226V compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (0 percent delta), trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.2 percent, leads the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7 percent, and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7 percent.

Q: Does the Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 226V does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the Core Ultra 5 226V?

A: The Core Ultra 5 226V scores 9848 in multi-core and 1744 in single-core on Cinebench R23.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 cores, while the Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores. The Core i5-14401TE has 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies from Intel. The Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. It uses the Core 14th Gen series branding and is classified as a desktop processor. The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2. It is classified as a mobile processor.

The process node difference is substantial. The 10 nm node for the i5-14401TE is an older Intel fabrication process, while the 3 nm node for the Core Ultra 5 226V is a more advanced TSMC process. This explains the significant TDP difference: the i5-14401TE draws 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 226V draws only 17 watts. The smaller process node allows for higher efficiency, which is reflected in the Core Ultra 5 226V's ability to deliver strong benchmark scores at lower power.

Cache configurations differ markedly. The i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 226V has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the Core Ultra 5 226V likely contribute to its strong single-thread performance, while the i5-14401TE's larger L3 cache may help with certain multi-threaded workloads, though no benchmarks confirm this.

The socket and platform differences are also critical. The i5-14401TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket that allows for motherboard selection and component swapping. The Core Ultra 5 226V uses Intel BGA 2833, a ball-grid array socket that is soldered to the motherboard, typical for mobile devices. This makes the i5-14401TE a more flexible option for builders, while the Core Ultra 5 226V is designed for integrated systems.

PCIe support varies as well. The i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 226V provides Gen 5 with only 4 lanes. The i5-14401TE's 16 lanes support multiple expansion cards, GPUs, or NVMe drives, whereas the Core Ultra 5 226V's 4 lanes are more limited, reflecting its mobile focus.

Integrated graphics differ. The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses Arc 130V. The Arc 130V is a newer GPU architecture, but no benchmark data is available for either iGPU in this comparison.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: the i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 cores and 8 threads. The i5-14401TE relies on hyper-threading to reach 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses physical cores only.

Base clocks differ slightly: the i5-14401TE runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 226V runs at 2.10 GHz. Both processors boost to 4.50 GHz, so their maximum single-core clock speeds are identical.

TDP is a major differentiator: the i5-14401TE has a 45 watt TDP, while the Core Ultra 5 226V has a 17 watt TDP. This makes the Core Ultra 5 226V significantly more power-efficient on paper.

Memory support differs. The i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 226V's memory support is listed as unknown and depends on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

ECC memory support is present on the i5-14401TE but absent on the Core Ultra 5 226V. This makes the i5-14401TE suitable for error-correcting workloads.

Process node differs: the i5-14401TE uses 10 nm at Intel, while the Core Ultra 5 226V uses 3 nm at TSMC. The die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14401TE, while no die size is recorded for the Core Ultra 5 226V.

Release dates differ: the i5-14401TE launched on 2024-06-30, while the Core Ultra 5 226V launched on 2024-09-23. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The market segments differ: the i5-14401TE targets desktops, while the Core Ultra 5 226V targets mobile devices. The part numbers also differ: Q4T4SRNJP for the i5-14401TE and SRPMQSRPMR for the Core Ultra 5 226V.