Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains recorded scores for the Intel Core i9-14901E, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries. This means every measurable comparison is one-sided. The i9-14901E delivers a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 25753 and a single-core score of 3635. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 10816 multicore and 1526 single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it records 2595 multicore and 366 single-core.

The PassMark suite shows the i9-14901E at 30298 in multithread testing and 4354 in single-thread testing. Integer math scores 112736, floating-point math reaches 81089, and extended instructions hit 17249. Data compression scores 288777, while data encryption records 18571. Random string sorting finishes at 39138, physics at 3041, and find prime numbers at 189.

Because the i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, there are no head-to-head deltas to report. The database records zero wins for the i5 and zero wins for the i9 in direct comparisons, but the absence of i5 data means the i9's scores stand alone. The i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 37911. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943, the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804. The i9-14901E trails the Ryzen 7 9700X by 0.1%, leads the Core 5 211E by 0.2%, and matches the HX 370 within rounding.

The single-core PassMark score of 4354 indicates strong per-thread performance, which typically benefits lightly threaded workloads such as older games or productivity apps. The multicore Cinebench R23 result of 25753 suggests the i9-14901E handles heavily threaded rendering and compilation tasks with considerable headroom. The data compression score of 288777 is particularly high, pointing to strong performance in archiving and file-handling tasks. Encryption throughput at 18571 is comparatively modest, while prime-number finding at 189 shows a weaker area relative to other integer workloads.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to the Core 14th Gen series, use the Raptor Lake architecture, and carry the Raptor Lake-R codename. They share the Intel Socket 1700, the 10 nm process node, and Intel as the foundry. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, both enable ECC memory, and both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configurations differ significantly. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the i5 and 2.80 GHz for the i9, with boost clocks of 4.50 GHz and 5.60 GHz respectively. Thermal design power is 45 watts for the i5 versus 65 watts for the i9. Die size scales with the core count: the i5 measures 215 mm², the i9 measures 257 mm².

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. Both share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the i5 and 2 MB per core on the i9. The shared L3 cache is 20 MB on the i5 and 36 MB on the i9. The larger per-core L2 and the nearly doubled L3 on the i9 provide more on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which can reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The i5 uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i9 uses UHD Graphics 770. Both are unlocked multipliers, meaning neither processor has a locked multiplier, though neither is marketed as an unlocked enthusiast part. Both launched on the same date, 2024-06-30, and both are Active in production status. Their part numbers are Q4T4SRNJP for the i5 and Q49ESRNJH for the i9. The i9-14901E carries a higher average benchmark score of 37911, while the i5-14401TE records no benchmark average.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The i9-14901E has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The i5 has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The i9 has 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14401TE and the i9-14901E have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The i9-14901E uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14401TE | Intel Core i9-14901E |

|----------------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Part Number | Q4T4SRNJP | Q49ESRNJH |

The shared specifications include Intel Socket 1700, Raptor Lake architecture, the Raptor Lake-R codename, 10 nm process node, DDR4/DDR5 support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the same release date of 2024-06-30, and Active production status. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14901E wins across every benchmark category where data exists. Its multicore Cinebench R23 score of 25753 indicates strong performance in rendering, video encoding, and other parallel workloads. The 30298 PassMark multithread score reinforces this, showing that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles heavy multitasking and threaded applications effectively. The high data compression score of 288777 makes it suitable for archive management and database operations. The 4354 single-thread score and 3635 Cinebench R23 single-core score show that per-thread performance is also strong, which benefits games and responsive desktop use.

The i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmarks, so it cannot be positioned as a winner in any measured category. However, its specifications indicate a lower-power option. The 45 watt TDP versus 65 watts on the i9 suggests the i5 draws less power under load, which can matter in thermally constrained systems or always-on environments. The smaller 215 mm² die also indicates a physically smaller chip. The 6-core, 12-thread setup with a 20 MB L3 cache still provides a capable foundation for everyday computing, though the database lacks scores to quantify that.

For users prioritizing maximum throughput, the i9-14901E is the clear choice based on all recorded data. It leads in every Cinebench generation and every PassMark workload category. Its 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 give it a memory hierarchy advantage that likely contributes to its benchmark standing. The i5-14401TE, with its lower clocks and fewer cores, is positioned for efficiency rather than raw performance, but without benchmark data, the database cannot assign it any measured wins. The i9's 86th percentile ranking places it among the top portion of all CPUs tracked, while the i5's percentile field is empty.