Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core i9-14900F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i9-14900F and the Intel Core i5-14401TE are both part of the Core 14th Gen lineup, but the benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between them. The i9-14900F holds an average benchmark score of 60008, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, meaning it represents the median performance level in the database. This difference in percentile ranking alone indicates that the i9-14900F is positioned well above the i5-14401TE in overall capability.

The i9-14900F's multicore performance is particularly dominant. In Cinebench R23 multicore tests, the i9-14900F scores 39551 points. In Cinebench R20 multicore, it reaches 16611 points, and in Cinebench R15 multicore, it achieves 3986 points. These scores reflect the processor's ability to handle heavily threaded workloads, which is expected given its core configuration. The PassMark multithread score of 46532 further confirms this strength, as does the Geekbench multicore result of 20008.

Single-core performance for the i9-14900F is also strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5583, while Cinebench R20 single-core reaches 2344 and Cinebench R15 single-core sits at 562. Geekbench single-core reports 2570, and PassMark single-thread performance is recorded at 4506. These figures indicate that the i9-14900F does not sacrifice single-threaded responsiveness even as it delivers substantial multicore throughput.

The i5-14401TE, lacking any recorded benchmark scores, cannot be directly compared on these specific tests. The database shows zero wins for the i5-14401TE and zero wins for the i9-14900F in head-to-head benchmark comparisons, which is a consequence of the i5-14401TE having no benchmark entries at all. What the data does show is that the i9-14900F's nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with an average score of 60099 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX also at 60104 with a -0.2 percent delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 with a 0.6 percent delta. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, which is 0.9 percent higher than the i9-14900F. These narrow deltas show that the i9-14900F performs within a tight band around these competing processors, with differences of less than 1 percent in each case.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and both use a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. However, the physical silicon differs. The i5-14401TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the i9-14900F uses a larger die at 257 mm². This larger die accommodates the i9-14900F's additional cores and cache, which is a direct architectural consequence of their different positioning within the 14th Gen family.

The core counts diverge sharply. The i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-14900F offers 24 cores and 32 threads. This is a 4x difference in core count and a 2.67x difference in thread count, which directly explains the multicore performance gap observed in the benchmark data. The i9-14900F's additional cores are the primary driver of its high Cinebench and PassMark multicore scores.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. Both processors have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache, however, is 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14401TE and 2 MB per core on the i9-14900F. The L3 cache is 20 MB shared on the i5-14401TE versus 36 MB shared on the i9-14900F. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the i9-14900F support its larger core count and help feed data to the additional execution resources.

Clock speeds reveal another architectural distinction. Both processors have a base clock of 2.00 GHz, but the boost clock differs substantially. The i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the i9-14900F reaches 5.80 GHz. This 1.30 GHz difference in maximum boost clock contributes to the i9-14900F's single-core performance advantage, as higher clock speeds directly improve single-threaded throughput.

The i5-14401TE includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 730, while the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This means the i5-14401TE can drive a display without a discrete graphics card, whereas the i9-14900F requires a separate GPU. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900F wins decisively in every measurable performance category. Its benchmark results show strength in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and the PassMark multithread score of 46532 make it suitable for rendering, video encoding, scientific computation, and other heavily parallel tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 and data encryption score of 34644 indicate its capability in data-intensive operations. Floating point math at 119550 and integer math at 177066 further demonstrate its arithmetic throughput. The PassMark extended instructions score of 31084 shows that the processor handles modern instruction sets efficiently.

The i9-14900F also delivers strong single-thread performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, which is the highest single-core result recorded for this processor across the Cinebench suite. The Geekbench single-core score of 2570 and PassMark single-thread score of 4506 confirm that it does not lag in tasks that rely on fewer cores, such as many games and everyday desktop applications.

The i5-14401TE has no benchmark data, so the database cannot attribute any specific wins to it. However, its specifications indicate where it might fit. With a 45 TDP versus the i9-14900F's 65 TDP, the i5-14401TE consumes less power, which could make it suitable for systems where thermal or power constraints are a priority. Its integrated UHD Graphics 730 means it can operate without a discrete GPU, which is an advantage in basic desktop or entry-level configurations. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.50 GHz boost clock is adequate for general productivity tasks, though the absence of benchmark scores prevents a quantitative assessment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. Core count is 6 versus 24, and thread count is 12 versus 32. The boost clock is 4.50 GHz on the i5-14401TE versus 5.80 GHz on the i9-14900F. TDP is 45 watts versus 65 watts. Die size is 215 mm² versus 257 mm². L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core versus 2 MB per core, and L3 cache is 20 MB shared versus 36 MB shared. Integrated graphics are present on the i5-14401TE as UHD Graphics 730, while the i9-14900F has none.

The launch MSRP for the i9-14900F is $524. The i5-14401TE has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. The release dates differ as well, with the i5-14401TE released on 2024-06-30 and the i9-14900F released on 2024-01-07. The part numbers are Q4T4SRNJP for the i5-14401TE and SRN3W for the i9-14900F. Both processors share the same socket, Intel Socket 1700, the same architecture and codename, the same process node, the same memory support, and the same PCIe configuration.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both the i5-14401TE and the i9-14900F support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A, so it requires a discrete graphics card.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the i9-14900F boosts to 5.80 GHz, a difference of 1.30 GHz.

Q: How does the i9-14900F compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008. It is 0.2 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, 0.6 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and 0.9 percent behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T.

Q: Are both processors overclockable?

A: No. Both the i5-14401TE and the i9-14900F have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i9-14900F is the clear performance leader based on the recorded data. Its average benchmark score of 60008 and 92nd percentile ranking place it among the top processors in the database. The multicore scores, particularly Cinebench R23 multicore at 39551 and PassMark multithread at 46532, show that it excels in threaded workloads. The single-core results, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 5583 and Geekbench single-core at 2570, confirm that it also handles lightly threaded tasks well. Users who need maximum throughput for rendering, compilation, or data processing should select the i9-14900F.

The i5-14401TE, with no benchmark scores, cannot be evaluated on measured performance. Its specifications suggest a lower-power alternative with a 45 TDP and integrated graphics, which could serve systems that do not require a discrete GPU and prioritize energy efficiency. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration and 4.50 GHz boost clock are modest compared to the i9-14900F, but the lack of data prevents any definitive performance claims.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark wins for either processor, and the i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries at all. For any workload where performance matters, the i9-14900F is the only choice supported by measured evidence. The i5-14401TE remains an option only for configurations where its lower TDP and integrated graphics are the primary considerations, as no performance data exists to recommend it otherwise.