Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison
Intel Core i5-14401TE
Core i9-14900
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core i9-14900
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i9-14900 dominates the Intel Core i5-14401TE in every recorded benchmark category, but the margin varies significantly by workload. The i9-14900 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070, while the i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of data for the i5-14401TE means the comparison relies entirely on the i9-14900's measured results and the architectural differences between the two parts.
The i9-14900 delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212, indicating strong per-thread performance. Its multi-core result of 31070 demonstrates substantial scaling from its 24 cores and 32 threads. In Geekbench testing, the i9-14900 records a multi-core score of 18495 and a single-core score of 2488. These results place the i9-14900 at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 58115.
The i5-14401TE, by contrast, has a percentile ranking of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the lack of recorded benchmark data. The database shows no nearest rivals for the i5-14401TE, while the i9-14900 sits within 1% of competing workstation and enthusiast processors. The i9-14900 trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%. It leads the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. This cluster of results indicates the i9-14900 performs at the upper tier of desktop processors, slightly behind some server-class silicon but ahead of others.
PassMark results for the i9-14900 further characterize its strengths. The multi-thread score of 44578 reflects heavy parallel workload capability. Integer math reaches 175010, floating-point math reaches 120262, and extended instructions score 30624. Data compression hits 550271, while data encryption scores 33540. Random string sorting records 61060. The single-thread PassMark score of 4323 matches the single-threaded result and confirms consistent per-core performance. Physics simulation scores 2486, and prime number searching records 188.
Where Each One Wins
The i9-14900 wins in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark data. Its 24 cores and 32 threads make it suited for heavily threaded workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 and PassMark multi-thread score of 44578 confirm this capability. The i9-14900 also handles single-threaded tasks effectively, as shown by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212 and Geekbench single-core score of 2488.
The i5-14401TE offers no benchmark records, so the database cannot confirm any workload where it wins. Its specifications suggest a more modest configuration: 6 cores, 12 threads, a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. These figures point to a processor designed for lower-power desktop use, but without measured results, no performance claims can be verified.
The i9-14900's PassMark data encryption score of 33540 and data compression score of 550271 indicate strong performance in security and storage-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 30624 suggests solid SIMD and vector workload handling. The floating-point math result of 120262 and integer math result of 175010 both point to computational strength across different arithmetic types. The physics score of 2486 reflects moderate performance in physics simulation workloads.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i9-14900?
A: The i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58115.
Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i9-14900 trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%. It leads the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%.
Q: What is the percentile ranking of the Intel Core i5-14401TE?
A: The i5-14401TE ranks in the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with no recorded benchmark scores.
Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i9-14900?
A: The i9-14900 has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the i5-14401TE supports ECC memory, as does the i9-14900.
Q: What integrated graphics does the Intel Core i9-14900 use?
A: The i9-14900 uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across core count, thread count, boost clock, TDP, die size, cache, integrated graphics, release date, and launch MSRP. The i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both share a base clock of 2.00 GHz, but the i9-14900 boosts to 5.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz for the i5-14401TE.
The i9-14900 has a TDP of 65, while the i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45. The die size measures 257 mm² for the i9-14900 and 215 mm² for the i5-14401TE. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and the same 10 nm process node from Intel.
L2 cache differs: the i9-14900 has 2 MB per core, while the i5-14401TE has 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache totals 36 MB shared on the i9-14900 versus 20 MB shared on the i5-14401TE. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core.
The i9-14900 uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The i9-14900 launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $549. The i5-14401TE launched on 2024-06-30. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, feature PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and support ECC memory. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename, and both are part of Intel's Core 14th Gen series. The process node is 10 nm for both, and Intel is the foundry for both chips. The i9-14900 belongs to the Core i9 generation within the Raptor Lake Refresh, while the i5-14401TE belongs to the Core i5 generation of the same refresh.
The core topology is the major architectural difference. The i9-14900 packs 24 cores and 32 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement that includes both performance and efficiency cores. The i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, suggesting a simpler configuration with fewer performance cores and no efficiency core complement at the same scale. The L2 cache allocation reflects this split: 2 MB per core on the i9-14900 versus 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14401TE. The L3 cache also differs substantially, with 36 MB shared on the i9-14900 and 20 MB shared on the i5-14401TE.
The integrated graphics differ as well, with the i9-14900 using UHD Graphics 770 and the i5-14401TE using UHD Graphics 730. Both support the same memory types and PCIe generation, so platform-level connectivity remains consistent. The production status for both is Active, and the market segment for both is Desktop. The die size difference of 257 mm² versus 215 mm² reflects the additional cores and cache on the i9-14900.
The Verdict
The recorded data makes the choice straightforward for workloads that demand maximum throughput. The i9-14900 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070, a PassMark multi-thread score of 44578, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 18495. Its 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 58115, places it among the strongest desktop processors in the database. The nearest rival comparisons confirm this position, with deltas under 1% against Xeon and Ryzen workstation parts. Users who run rendering, compilation, data compression, or encryption workloads will find the i9-14900's measured results compelling, particularly the data compression score of 550271 and the integer math score of 175010.
The i5-14401TE cannot be evaluated on the same basis because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its specifications indicate a lower-power part with a 45 TDP, 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 4.50 GHz boost clock. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache suggest modest multitasking capability. The 50th percentile ranking, combined with an average benchmark score of 0, reflects the absence of recorded data rather than measured performance. For users who prioritize lower power consumption and need only basic desktop responsiveness, the i5-14401TE may fit a specific niche, but the database cannot confirm its performance level.
The i9-14900 is the only one of the two with verified benchmark results, and those results are strong across single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. Its single-core scores of 2212 in Cinebench R23 and 2488 in Geekbench indicate fast per-thread execution. Its multi-core results show excellent scaling from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The launch MSRP of $549 for the i9-14900 appears once in the record, while the i5-14401TE has no launch MSRP listed. The data supports choosing the i9-14900 for any performance-sensitive application, while the i5-14401TE remains an unverified alternative for lower-power builds.