AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and the Intel Core i5-14401TE is complicated by a fundamental gap in the recorded data. The database contains a full set of 17 benchmark results for the AMD part, covering Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and a broad PassMark suite. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, by contrast, has an empty benchmark array: no Cinebench scores, no PassMark scores, and no average benchmark score recorded. This means a direct head-to-head comparison of measured performance cannot be constructed from the database as it currently stands.

What can be established is the AMD processor's absolute standing. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE records an average benchmark score of 28,054, which places it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14500T, posts an average score of 28,065, a delta of 0%, so the 8500GE sits effectively tied with that part. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28,032 with a delta of 0.1%, again essentially level. The Intel Core i9-12900H comes in at 28,003 with a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 8500GE edges past a high-end mobile H-series part. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 leads the group slightly at 28,128 with a delta of -0.3%, so the 8500GE trails that part by a hair. The data shows a tightly clustered set of rivals within a 0.5% band, and the 8500GE sits squarely in the middle of that pack.

Looking at the AMD part's individual Cinebench results, the multicore scores are 1,854 in R15, 7,725 in R20, and 18,395 in R23. Single-core results are 261 in R15, 1,090 in R20, and 2,597 in R23. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 21,502 and a single-thread score of 3,909. The data compression score is 248,675, data encryption is 14,163, extended instructions are 17,999, and find prime numbers is 83. Floating point math scores 39,233, integer math scores 63,045, physics scores 1,237, and random string sorting scores 31,240. These are standalone values; without Intel benchmark entries, there is no basis in the database for claiming either processor wins any specific test.

The percentile figures reinforce the asymmetry. The AMD part is at the 80th percentile versus all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The database records zero wins for either side in a head-to-head sense because no paired benchmark data exists. The only meaningful interpretation available is that the AMD 8500GE has a rich set of measured scores placing it above the median and level with several strong rivals, while the Intel 14401TE has no recorded measurements at all, so its position at the 50th percentile appears to reflect a default or incomplete classification rather than a demonstrated performance level.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE can be characterized across workload categories from its recorded scores. In single-threaded work, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,597 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3,909 indicate a strong showing for lightly threaded applications. In multithreaded work, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,395 and the PassMark multithread score of 21,502 show substantial parallel capability. The PassMark integer math score of 63,045 versus the floating point math score of 39,233 suggests the processor handles integer-heavy tasks with more throughput than floating point operations, which is relevant for general productivity workloads. The data compression score of 248,675 is by far the largest PassMark value in the set, indicating a particular strength in compression algorithms. Data encryption at 14,163 and extended instructions at 17,999 are moderate relative to the other PassMark figures, while physics at 1,237 and find prime numbers at 83 are the lowest scores recorded.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries in the database, so there is no recorded data to assign any workload win to that part. The only information available for the Intel processor is its 50th percentile ranking, which cannot be tied to any specific test result. The database therefore supports a lopsided conclusion: the AMD 8500GE demonstrably wins every category where scores exist, simply because the Intel 14401TE has no measured results to contest any of them. That is not a claim of superiority in any real-world sense; it is a statement about the completeness of the records. The AMD part has a full profile across Cinebench and PassMark, while the Intel part is a placeholder with a percentile and nothing else.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE?

A: The average benchmark score is 28,054, which places it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel part is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, with a percentile ranking of 50.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28,065 with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28,032 with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28,003 with a delta of 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28,128 with a delta of -0.3%. The 8500GE is effectively level with all of them.

Q: What is the highest recorded PassMark score for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE?

A: The highest is data compression at 248,675, followed by integer math at 63,045, floating point math at 39,233, random string sorting at 31,240, multithread at 21,502, and extended instructions at 17,999.

Q: What is the highest Cinebench score for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE?

A: The highest is Cinebench R23 multicore at 18,395. The R20 multicore score is 7,725, and the R15 multicore score is 1,854. Single-core scores are 2,597 in R23, 1,090 in R20, and 261 in R15.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking, the AMD or the Intel?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is at the 80th percentile, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE is at the 50th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The AMD part carries a TDP of 35 watts; the Intel part is rated at 45 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, whereas the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics units are different models: the AMD part has a Radeon 740M, and the Intel part has UHD Graphics 730. The market segments are recorded as Mobile for the AMD part and Desktop for the Intel part. Release dates differ, with the AMD part dated 2024-04-15 and the Intel part dated 2024-06-30. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001185, while the Intel part has a part number of Q4T4SRNJP. Both are listed as Active in production status, and both have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is stark. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2, belonging to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 5 generation as listed under Zen 4 (Phoenix). It is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC, with 20,900 million transistors and a die size of 137 mm². The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 generation under Raptor Lake Refresh. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, with no transistor count recorded in the database and a die size of 215 mm².

Cache configurations differ in both per-core and shared capacities. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither part has a recorded total L3 value or vCache3d data. Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, so the core and thread counts are identical; the differences lie in the underlying microarchitecture, process technology, and cache hierarchy.

The foundry and process node gap is notable: TSMC's 4 nm process for the AMD part versus Intel's 10 nm process for the Intel part. The die size difference, 137 mm² versus 215 mm², reflects different design approaches and manufacturing targets. The AMD part is marked as a Mobile segment product despite using a desktop socket, while the Intel part is marked as Desktop. The database does not provide transistor counts for the Intel part, so a direct transistor comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but one-sided verdict. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has a complete measured profile: an average benchmark score of 28,054, an 80th percentile ranking, and a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results that position it level with rivals such as the Intel Core i5-14500T, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G, and the Intel Core i9-12900H. It also holds a slight edge over the Intel Core i9-12900H by 0.2% and trails the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 by only 0.3%. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark results, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, so there is no measured basis in the database for selecting it over the AMD part.

The specification and architecture sections reinforce the AMD part's position. It offers a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts, a smaller 4 nm process node versus 10 nm, and a smaller die size of 137 mm² versus 215 mm². The Intel part counters with a larger L3 cache of 20 MB versus 16 MB, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, support for DDR4 in addition to DDR5, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Those advantages are real, but they are unquantified in terms of performance because no benchmark data exists for the Intel part.

Who should pick which, strictly from the data? A user looking for a processor with verified scores across Cinebench and PassMark, a high percentile standing, lower power draw, and a more advanced process node would have the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE as the only option with measured evidence. A user considering the Intel Core i5-14401TE would be relying on its specification sheet alone: the larger cache, the broader memory support, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface. The database cannot validate the Intel part's performance, so any selection of it would be based on unmeasured attributes rather than recorded results. The verdict, as the data stands, favors the AMD processor for anyone who requires demonstrated benchmark scores.