Intel Core i5-14401E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14401E enters the database with a full suite of Cinebench results, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for compute performance. The Intel part shows six Cinebench R23 multicore results and six Cinebench R23 singlecore results, with the multicore score reaching 18161 and the singlecore score reaching 2564. The Cinebench R20 run produced a multicore score of 7627 and a singlecore score of 1076. In Cinebench R15, the Intel chip records a multicore score of 1830 and a singlecore score of 258.

The Intel Core i5-14401E carries an average benchmark score of 5253 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database sits at 60, meaning it outperforms the majority of tracked processors. The nearest rivals in the database provide context for this figure. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 posts an average score of 5259, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14401E. The Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5241, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-10850K also scores 5240, again 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5210, which is 0.8% lower.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100, the database lists no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals. The percentile field for the Snapdragon sits at 50, but without any measured scores, that percentile cannot be tied to actual performance data. The absence of results means the Snapdragon cannot be positioned relative to the Intel part or any other CPU in the database. The head-to-head benchmark table between the two CPUs is empty, and the win counters for both parts stand at zero.

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14401E delivers measurable Cinebench performance across three versions of the test, from R15 through R23. The trend shows the expected scaling: multicore scores rise from 1830 in R15 to 7627 in R20 and then to 18161 in R23. Singlecore scores rise from 258 in R15 to 1076 in R20 and then to 2564 in R23. These recorded values give the Intel part a concrete performance profile. The Snapdragon has no such profile in the database, so any claim about its benchmark performance would lack supporting evidence.

The Intel i5-14401E also shows a clear relationship with its nearest rivals. The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is essentially tied with the i5, differing by only 0.1%. The three other nearest rivals, the Core i7-11700B, Core i9-10850K, and Core i5-13400T, all trail the i5 by small margins ranging from 0.2% to 0.8%. These deltas are narrow, indicating that the i5-14401E sits in a tightly competitive band of desktop processors.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice for users who need verified compute performance. The Intel Core i5-14401E has six Cinebench scores, an average benchmark score of 5253, and a percentile ranking of 60. It competes within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 and leads the Intel Core i7-11700B, Core i9-10850K, and Core i5-13400T by margins of 0.2% to 0.8%. For anyone relying on database measurements to select a processor, the Intel part offers a fully documented performance record.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no benchmark scores in the database, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile of 50 cannot be validated against any measured result. The Snapdragon does have a different market segment, mobile compared to desktop, and a different socket, Qualcomm BGA 2073 compared to Intel Socket 1700. But the absence of benchmark data means no performance-based verdict can be made for it.

Users who require a desktop processor with confirmed Cinebench results should select the Intel Core i5-14401E. Users who require a mobile processor with a 12-core configuration and a 35 watt TDP may consider the Snapdragon, but they must accept that the database contains no performance measurements for it. The data does not support any comparison of compute speed, efficiency, or overall capability between these two parts. The only honest conclusion from the recorded information is that the Intel processor has measurable performance, and the Qualcomm processor does not.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14401E?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253 across all recorded tests.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Snapdragon X1E-80-100, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14401E compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 has an average score of 5259, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14401E's average score of 5253.

Q: What percentile does the Intel Core i5-14401E hold among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E holds a 60th percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database.

Q: What percentile does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 hold among all CPUs?

A: The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 holds a 50th percentile ranking, but no benchmark scores back that figure.

Q: Which Intel rival has the largest recorded advantage over the i5-14401E?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the only nearest rival with a higher average score, at 5259, representing a 0.1% lead over the i5-14401E.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i5-14401E and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Snapdragon has 12 cores and 12 threads. The base clock for the Intel part is 2.50 GHz, and the Snapdragon's base clock is 3.40 GHz. The boost clock for the Intel part is 4.70 GHz, while the Snapdragon boosts to 4.00 GHz. The Intel part has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Snapdragon has a TDP of 35 watts.

The socket types differ completely. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The market segments also differ, with the Intel part listed as Desktop and the Snapdragon listed as Mobile. The production status for both is Active.

The memory support differs substantially. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Snapdragon supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The Intel part supports ECC memory, while the Snapdragon does not.

The PCIe specifications differ. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only. The Snapdragon uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, CPU only. The integrated graphics also differ, with the Intel part featuring UHD Graphics 730 and the Snapdragon featuring Adreno X1-85.

The release dates differ, with the Intel part releasing on 2024-06-30 and the Snapdragon releasing on 2024-04-23. The part numbers are distinct, with the Intel part listed as Q49JSRNJS and the Snapdragon as X1E80100. Both parts have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architecture records show a fundamental divergence between the two processors. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, with a codename of Raptor Lake-R and a generation label of Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no architecture field recorded, but its codename is Oryon and its generation label is Snapdragon X (Elite).

The process node differs significantly. The Intel part is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Snapdragon is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC's foundry. The die size for the Intel part is recorded as 215 mm², while the Snapdragon has no die size data.

The cache structures are entirely different. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither part has a total L3 figure or a vCache3d figure recorded.

The core and thread counts reflect different design philosophies. The Intel part uses 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading. The Snapdragon uses 12 cores and 12 threads, indicating a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio without multithreading. The clock speeds also reflect different strategies: the Intel part has a lower base clock of 2.50 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the Snapdragon has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

The power envelope differs, with the Intel part rated at 65 watts TDP and the Snapdragon at 35 watts TDP. The Intel part's architecture is tied to a desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, while the Snapdragon's architecture is tied to a mobile socket, Qualcomm BGA 2073. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the Snapdragon does not. These architectural differences indicate two processors designed for entirely different platforms and usage scenarios.