Intel Core i5-14401E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two processors. The Intel Core i5-14401E dominates the multi-threaded and sustained workload tests, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V takes a single win in one legacy single-core test.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14401E scores 18,161 against the Ultra 7 268V's 10,653. That is a 70.5% advantage, the largest delta recorded in this comparison. The gap comes from the i5's 12 threads versus the Ultra 7's 8 threads, combined with a higher sustained power envelope. The R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: 7,627 for the i5 versus 6,887 for the Ultra 7, a 10.7% lead. Even in R15 multi-core, the i5 leads with 1,830 against 1,616, a 13.2% margin.

The single-core results are more nuanced. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i5-14401E wins with 2,564 versus 1,921, a 33.5% margin. That is a substantial gap, indicating the i5's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz delivers meaningful per-thread performance in modern workloads. In R20 single-core, the i5 again leads with 1,076 versus 972, another 10.7% advantage. The only test where the Ultra 7 wins is Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 293 against the i5's 258, an 11.9% difference. That result appears anomalous relative to the newer Cinebench versions, where the i5 holds a clear edge.

The overall win tally is 5 for the i5-14401E and 1 for the Ultra 7 268V. The i5's victories are not narrow; they range from 10.7% to 70.5%. The Ultra 7's single win is 11.9%, which does not offset the multi-core dominance. The data indicates that for raw compute throughput, the desktop-oriented i5-14401E is the stronger part across nearly every measured metric.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design lineages. The i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm node. This process difference is significant: the 3 nm node allows the Ultra 7 to operate at a 17 W TDP, while the i5-14401E has a 65 W TDP. The i5's die size is recorded at 215 mm², while the Ultra 7's die size is not listed in the database.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads, relying on Hyper-Threading to reach that thread count. The Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores and 8 threads, with no simultaneous multi-threading. The Ultra 7's extra physical cores do not compensate for the i5's thread advantage in multi-core benchmarks, as the Cinebench results confirm.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The i5-14401E uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 268V uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and only 12 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 has larger per-core caches but less total L3, reflecting its mobile design priorities.

Memory support differs. The i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it supports ECC memory. The Ultra 7 268V's memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with no ECC capability. The i5 also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Ultra 7 offers PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 CPU lanes, a major difference for expandability.

Integrated graphics are another point of divergence. The i5-14401E uses UHD Graphics 730, a basic desktop iGPU. The Ultra 7 268V uses Arc 140V, which is a substantially more capable integrated solution, though the database does not provide comparative graphics benchmark scores.

The sockets and market segments reflect their intended use cases. The i5-14401E is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, released on 2024-06-30. The Ultra 7 268V is a mobile part on Intel BGA 2833, released on 2024-09-23. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: How many threads does each processor support?

A: The i5-14401E supports 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Ultra 7 268V supports 8 threads from 8 cores.

Q: Which processor has better multi-core Cinebench performance?

A: The i5-14401E wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests. In R23 multi-core, it scores 18,161 versus 10,653 for the Ultra 7, a 70.5% lead.

Q: Does the Ultra 7 268V support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ultra 7 268V does not support ECC memory. The i5-14401E does support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Ultra 7 268V is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the i5-14401E uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: What is the integrated graphics solution on each processor?

A: The i5-14401E uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Ultra 7 268V uses Arc 140V.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14401E | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 17 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | Depends on motherboard |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 4 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc 140V |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-09-23 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in every multi-threaded benchmark and in the two most recent single-core Cinebench tests. Its 12 threads and 65 W TDP allow it to sustain high throughput in rendering workloads, as shown by the 70.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support make it suitable for desktop workstations that prioritize compute density. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage, reinforcing its role as a desktop workhorse.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V wins only in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 293 versus 258. Its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz gives it a theoretical per-thread advantage, but that does not translate into wins in the newer R20 or R23 single-core tests. The Ultra 7's strengths lie outside the benchmark suite: a 17 W TDP makes it far more power-efficient, and the 3 nm TSMC process node indicates a modern fabrication. The Arc 140V integrated graphics are a clear upgrade over UHD Graphics 730, making the Ultra 7 better suited for lightweight mobile systems where discrete graphics are unnecessary.

The use-case split is straightforward. For stationary systems with access to power and cooling, the i5-14401E delivers superior multi-core performance and broader PCIe connectivity. For portable devices where battery life and thermal limits are primary constraints, the Ultra 7 268V offers a much lower power draw and a more capable integrated GPU. The database places the i5-14401E at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, while the Ultra 7 268V sits at the 74th percentile, reflecting that the Ultra 7's overall average benchmark score of 20,897 is boosted by its passmark results, which are not directly comparable to the i5's Cinebench-only score set.