Intel Core i5-14401E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i5-14401E and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H shows a decisive advantage for the mobile processor in most rendering workloads, with one notable single-core exception. Across six Cinebench tests, the Core Ultra 7 265H claims five victories, while the Core i5-14401E takes one.

The largest margin appears in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 2989 against 1830 for the Core i5-14401E, a delta of 38.8 percent. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multicore, with scores of 12131 and 7627 respectively, another 37.1 percent gap. The Core Ultra 7 265H also wins Cinebench R20 singlecore by the same 37.1 percent margin, scoring 1712 versus 1076.

Cinebench R15 singlecore shows a smaller but still clear advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H, 307 versus 258, a 16 percent difference. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the gap narrows substantially: the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 19940 against 18161 for the Core i5-14401E, an 8.9 percent margin. This compression suggests that the longer rendering workload reduces the advantage of the higher-core-count part, though it still finishes ahead.

The sole victory for the Core i5-14401E comes in Cinebench R23 singlecore. There it scores 2564 against 2080 for the Core Ultra 7 265H, a 23.3 percent lead. This result indicates that the desktop chip's per-core performance in sustained single-threaded rendering is substantially stronger, despite the Core Ultra 7 265H having a higher boost clock of 5.30 GHz compared to 4.70 GHz.

The average benchmark score data reinforces the overall picture. The Core Ultra 7 265H sits at an average of 41621, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 251TE, which averages 41650 with a delta of -0.1 percent, and the Intel Core i7-14650HX at 41576 with a 0.1 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X trails at 41376, a 0.6 percent difference. The Core i5-14401E, by contrast, averages 5253 and sits in the 60th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 5259 (-0.1 percent), the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241 (0.2 percent), the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240 (0.2 percent), and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210 (0.8 percent).

The difference in average benchmark score between the two processors is substantial, but it must be read carefully: the Core Ultra 7 265H's average includes PassMark tests that are not present in the Core i5-14401E's benchmark set, so direct comparison of the averages is not apples-to-apples. The head-to-head Cinebench results provide the cleaner comparison, and they consistently favor the Core Ultra 7 265H in multicore and most single-core tests.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split by workload type. For multicore rendering tasks, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is the stronger processor. Its Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore scores all exceed those of the Intel Core i5-14401E, with margins ranging from 8.9 to 38.8 percent. The 16-core, 16-thread configuration of the Core Ultra 7 265H, built on a 3 nm TSMC process, delivers consistently higher throughput in these tests.

For single-threaded sustained rendering, the Intel Core i5-14401E takes the lead in Cinebench R23 singlecore by 23.3 percent. However, this is the only test it wins. In Cinebench R15 singlecore and Cinebench R20 singlecore, the Core Ultra 7 265H wins by 16 percent and 37.1 percent respectively. The i5-14401E's singlecore victory appears isolated to the R23 workload, which may reflect differences in how the two architectures handle sustained single-thread boost behavior under that specific test.

The Core Ultra 7 265H also holds a higher percentile ranking, 88th versus 60th, indicating that its overall benchmark profile places it well above the i5-14401E in the database's distribution of all CPUs. The i5-14401E's nearest rivals are older desktop parts like the Intel Core i9-10850K and the Intel Core i5-13400T, while the Core Ultra 7 265H competes with mobile HX-series chips and a desktop Ryzen 9 part, a higher performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the majority of the head-to-head Cinebench tests?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H wins five of the six head-to-head tests, with the Intel Core i5-14401E winning only Cinebench R23 singlecore.

Q: What is the largest performance margin between the two processors?

A: The largest margin is in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H leads by 38.8 percent with a score of 2989 versus 1830.

Q: In which test does the Intel Core i5-14401E outperform the Core Ultra 7 265H?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E wins Cinebench R23 singlecore with a score of 2564 against 2080, a 23.3 percent advantage.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265H's single-core Cinebench R20 score compare to the i5-14401E's?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265H scores 1712 in Cinebench R20 singlecore, which is 37.1 percent higher than the i5-14401E's 1076.

Q: What are the percentile rankings of the two processors in the database?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401E ranks in the 60th percentile.

Q: What is the closest rival to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H by average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE is the closest rival, with an average score of 41650, a delta of -0.1 percent from the Core Ultra 7 265H's 41621.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H uses 16 cores and 16 threads. The i5-14401E has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz; the Core Ultra 7 265H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Thermal design power differs sharply: the i5-14401E is rated at 65 W, the Core Ultra 7 265H at 28 W.

The socket and market segment separate the two clearly. The i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment, while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses Intel BGA 2049 and targets mobile. The i5-14401E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 7 265H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core Ultra 7 265H lists a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; the i5-14401E does not list a memory bandwidth figure in the data.

PCIe lane counts differ: the i5-14401E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 265H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the i5-14401E using UHD Graphics 730 and the Core Ultra 7 265H using Arc Graphics 140T. Both processors support ECC memory. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. Release dates differ by roughly six months: the i5-14401E was released on 2024-06-30, the Core Ultra 7 265H on 2025-01-12. Neither processor has a launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Intel Core i5-14401E is built on Raptor Lake, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H uses Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-H, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2. The process node differs substantially: the i5-14401E uses a 10 nm Intel process, while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses a 3 nm TSMC process. The foundry also differs, Intel for the i5-14401E and TSMC for the Core Ultra 7 265H.

Cache organization shows a clear generational shift. The i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 7 265H has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The die size is listed only for the i5-14401E at 215 mm²; no die size is recorded for the Core Ultra 7 265H. Transistor counts are not listed for either processor.

The market segment difference is reflected in the architecture choices. The desktop-oriented Raptor Lake design of the i5-14401E emphasizes higher base clocks and a conventional 6-core, 12-thread layout. The mobile-oriented Arrow Lake-H design of the Core Ultra 7 265H uses a higher core count of 16 with 16 threads, indicating a performance-core and efficiency-core arrangement typical of the series, though the data does not break down core types. The smaller process node and lower TDP of the Core Ultra 7 265H align with mobile requirements, while the i5-14401E's higher TDP and larger die reflect desktop power delivery.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is the clear winner in multicore rendering. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests all favor it, with deltas of 38.8, 37.1, and 8.9 percent respectively. Its 16-core, 16-thread configuration and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide a substantial throughput advantage in parallel workloads. The single-core Cinebench R15 and R20 results also favor the Core Ultra 7 265H, by 16 and 37.1 percent, meaning it dominates five of the six recorded head-to-head tests. Its higher boost clock of 5.30 GHz and newer Arrow Lake architecture support strong performance across most Cinebench variants.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins only in Cinebench R23 singlecore, where it leads by 23.3 percent. This result suggests that for workloads that resemble sustained single-threaded rendering in the R23 test, the i5-14401E's Raptor Lake architecture delivers superior per-core performance. The 65 W TDP and desktop socket indicate it is designed for systems with conventional cooling and power delivery, where sustained single-core boost behavior can be maintained.

For use-case selection, the data supports the Core Ultra 7 265H for any task dominated by Cinebench-style rendering, whether multicore or most single-core variants. The i5-14401E is preferable specifically for the Cinebench R23 singlecore workload, where its 23.3 percent margin is decisive. The Core Ultra 7 265H also offers a lower TDP of 28 W versus 65 W, which matters for systems where thermal and power budgets are constrained, though the i5-14401E's desktop platform allows for more traditional cooling solutions. The mobile segment placement of the Core Ultra 7 265H and the desktop placement of the i5-14401E further separate their intended use cases, with the benchmark data reflecting the Core Ultra 7 265H's higher overall standing in the database.